• Something wrong with this record ?

Application of photogrammetry reconstruction for hyperthermia quality control measurements

T. Drizdal, MM. Paulides, K. Sumser, D. Vrba, L. Malena, J. Vrba, O. Fiser, GC. van Rhoon

. 2022 ; 101 (-) : 87-94. [pub] 20220817

Language English Country Italy

Document type Journal Article

PURPOSE: Hyperthermia is a cancer treatment in which the target region is heated to temperatures of 40-44 °C usually applying external electromagnetic field sources. The behavior of the hyperthermia applicators (antennas) in clinical practice should be periodically checked with phantom experiments to verify the applicator's performance over time. The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of photogrammetry reconstructions of 3D applicator position in these quality control procedure measurements. METHODS: Photogrammetry reconstruction was applied at superficial hyperthermia scenario using the Lucite cone applicator (LCA) and phased-array heating in the head and neck region using the HYPERcollar3D. Wire-frame models of the entire measurement setups were created from multiple-view images and used for recreation of the setup inside 3D electromagnetic field simulation software. We evaluated applicator relation (Ra) between measured and simulated absolute specific absorption rate (SAR) for manually created and photogrammetry reconstructed simulation setups. RESULTS: We found a displacement of 7.9 mm for the LCA and 8.2 mm for the HYPERcollar3D setups when comparing manually created and photogrammetry reconstructed applicator models placements. Ra improved from 1.24 to 1.18 for the LCA and from 1.17 to 1.07 for the HYPERcollar3D when using photogrammetry reconstructed simulation setups. CONCLUSION: Photogrammetry reconstruction technique holds promise to improve measurement setup reconstruction and agreement between measured and simulated absolute SAR.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22024668
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100405.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.008 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35987024
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Drizdal, Tomas $u Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic; Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: t.drizdal@erasmusmc.nl
245    10
$a Application of photogrammetry reconstruction for hyperthermia quality control measurements / $c T. Drizdal, MM. Paulides, K. Sumser, D. Vrba, L. Malena, J. Vrba, O. Fiser, GC. van Rhoon
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Hyperthermia is a cancer treatment in which the target region is heated to temperatures of 40-44 °C usually applying external electromagnetic field sources. The behavior of the hyperthermia applicators (antennas) in clinical practice should be periodically checked with phantom experiments to verify the applicator's performance over time. The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of photogrammetry reconstructions of 3D applicator position in these quality control procedure measurements. METHODS: Photogrammetry reconstruction was applied at superficial hyperthermia scenario using the Lucite cone applicator (LCA) and phased-array heating in the head and neck region using the HYPERcollar3D. Wire-frame models of the entire measurement setups were created from multiple-view images and used for recreation of the setup inside 3D electromagnetic field simulation software. We evaluated applicator relation (Ra) between measured and simulated absolute specific absorption rate (SAR) for manually created and photogrammetry reconstructed simulation setups. RESULTS: We found a displacement of 7.9 mm for the LCA and 8.2 mm for the HYPERcollar3D setups when comparing manually created and photogrammetry reconstructed applicator models placements. Ra improved from 1.24 to 1.18 for the LCA and from 1.17 to 1.07 for the HYPERcollar3D when using photogrammetry reconstructed simulation setups. CONCLUSION: Photogrammetry reconstruction technique holds promise to improve measurement setup reconstruction and agreement between measured and simulated absolute SAR.
650    12
$a indukovaná hypertermie $7 D006979
650    _2
$a fantomy radiodiagnostické $7 D019047
650    _2
$a fotogrammetrie $7 D010780
650    _2
$a polymethylmethakrylát $7 D019904
650    _2
$a řízení kvality $7 D011786
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Paulides, Margarethus M $u Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP Eindhoven, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Sumser, Kemal $u Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Vrba, David $u Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Malena, Lukas $u Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vrba, Jan $u Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Fiser, Ondrej $u Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a van Rhoon, Gerard C $u Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
773    0_
$w MED00167391 $t Physica medica $x 1724-191X $g Roč. 101, č. - (2022), s. 87-94
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35987024 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100402 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854417 $s 1175958
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 101 $c - $d 87-94 $e 20220817 $i 1724-191X $m Physica medica $n Phys Med $x MED00167391
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...