• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Early- and longer-term outcomes of David versus Florida sleeve procedure: propensity-matched comparison

T. Holubec, H. Rashid, F. Hecker, A. Karimian-Tabrizi, A. Miskovic, J. Hlavicka, P. Zacek, A. Van Linden, A. Moritz, T. Walther

. 2022 ; 62 (3) : . [pub] 20220803

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22024920

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare short- and longer-term outcomes of David (DV) versus Florida sleeve (FS) procedure in patients requiring valve-sparing aortic root replacement. METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 2020 285 patients received a DV procedure (median age 60 years; 26% females) and 57 patients underwent an FS procedure (median age 64 years; 19% females) in our department. Propensity score matching using patient characteristics led to 58 (DV) versus 57 (FS) patients. End points were defined as primary: freedom from aortic valve and/or aortic root-related reoperation and freedom from aortic regurgitation ≥moderate and secondary: early and late survival. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 2% (DV) and 0% (FS) (P = 0.319). There was 1 early stroke in each group (P = 0.990). Follow-up was complete in 99% with only 1 patient (FS) lost. The 5- and 10-year freedom from aortic valve and/or aortic root related reoperation was 98 ± 2% and 96 ± 3% in the DV group and 92 ± 5% and 84 ± 9% in the FS group, respectively (P = 0.095). The 5- and 10-year freedom from aortic regurgitation ≥moderate was 88 ± 5% and 80 ± 8% in the DV group and 92 ± 5% and 78 ± 1% in the FS group, respectively (P = 0.782). The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 93 ± 4% and 82 ± 6% (DV) vs 75 ± 7% and 67 ± 10% (FS), respectively (P = 0.058). No case of endocarditis (DV) and 3 cases of endocarditis (FS) (P = 0.055) were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both DV and FS resulted in similar early and longer-term outcomes with a trend to slightly better performance and survival in the DV group. Florida sleeve procedure might be an alternative approach for patients with higher-risk profiles requiring valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22024920
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100334.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/ejcts/ezac104 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35224629
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Holubec, Tomas $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000323660880
245    10
$a Early- and longer-term outcomes of David versus Florida sleeve procedure: propensity-matched comparison / $c T. Holubec, H. Rashid, F. Hecker, A. Karimian-Tabrizi, A. Miskovic, J. Hlavicka, P. Zacek, A. Van Linden, A. Moritz, T. Walther
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare short- and longer-term outcomes of David (DV) versus Florida sleeve (FS) procedure in patients requiring valve-sparing aortic root replacement. METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 2020 285 patients received a DV procedure (median age 60 years; 26% females) and 57 patients underwent an FS procedure (median age 64 years; 19% females) in our department. Propensity score matching using patient characteristics led to 58 (DV) versus 57 (FS) patients. End points were defined as primary: freedom from aortic valve and/or aortic root-related reoperation and freedom from aortic regurgitation ≥moderate and secondary: early and late survival. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 2% (DV) and 0% (FS) (P = 0.319). There was 1 early stroke in each group (P = 0.990). Follow-up was complete in 99% with only 1 patient (FS) lost. The 5- and 10-year freedom from aortic valve and/or aortic root related reoperation was 98 ± 2% and 96 ± 3% in the DV group and 92 ± 5% and 84 ± 9% in the FS group, respectively (P = 0.095). The 5- and 10-year freedom from aortic regurgitation ≥moderate was 88 ± 5% and 80 ± 8% in the DV group and 92 ± 5% and 78 ± 1% in the FS group, respectively (P = 0.782). The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 93 ± 4% and 82 ± 6% (DV) vs 75 ± 7% and 67 ± 10% (FS), respectively (P = 0.058). No case of endocarditis (DV) and 3 cases of endocarditis (FS) (P = 0.055) were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both DV and FS resulted in similar early and longer-term outcomes with a trend to slightly better performance and survival in the DV group. Florida sleeve procedure might be an alternative approach for patients with higher-risk profiles requiring valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
650    _2
$a aortální chlopeň $x chirurgie $7 D001021
650    12
$a aortální insuficience $x chirurgie $7 D001022
650    12
$a endokarditida $x chirurgie $7 D004696
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a reoperace $7 D012086
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Rashid, Hiwad $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
700    1_
$a Hecker, Florian $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
700    1_
$a Karimian-Tabrizi, Afsaneh $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
700    1_
$a Miskovic, Alexandra $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
700    1_
$a Hlavicka, Jan $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000335786501
700    1_
$a Zacek, Pavel $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove and Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000211205453
700    1_
$a Van Linden, Arnaud $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
700    1_
$a Moritz, Anton $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
700    1_
$a Walther, Thomas $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000228928949
773    0_
$w MED00001607 $t European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery $x 1873-734X $g Roč. 62, č. 3 (2022)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35224629 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100332 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854562 $s 1176210
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 62 $c 3 $e 20220803 $i 1873-734X $m European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery $n Eur J Cardiothorac Surg $x MED00001607
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace