-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
From computed tomography to finite element space: A unified bone material mapping strategy
P. Henyš, M. Vořechovský, J. Stebel, M. Kuchař, P. Exner
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- analýza metodou konečných prvků MeSH
- kosti a kostní tkáň * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- kostní denzita MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie * metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: The spatially varying mechanical properties in finite element models of bone are most often derived from bone density data obtained via quantitative computed tomography. The key step is to accurately and efficiently map the density given in voxels to the finite element mesh. METHODS: The density projection is first formulated in least-squares terms and then discretized using a continuous and discontinuous variant of the finite element method. Both discretization variants are compared with the nodal and element approaches known from the literature. FINDINGS: In terms of accuracy in the L2 norm, energy distance and efficiency, the discontinuous zero-order variant appears to be the most advantageous. The proposed variant sufficiently preserves the spectrum of density at the edges, while keeping computational cost low. INTERPRETATION: The continuous finite element method is analogous to the nodal formulation in the literature, while the discontinuous finite element method is analogous to the element formulation. The two variants differ in terms of implementation, computational cost and ability to preserve the density spectrum. These differences cannot be described and measured by known indirect methods from the literature.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22025301
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20221031100130.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221017s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105704 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)35849946
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Henyš, Petr $u Institute of New Technologies and Applied Informatics, Faculty of Mechatronics, Informatics and Interdisciplinary Studies, Technical University of Liberec, Studentská 1402/2, 46117 Liberec, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a From computed tomography to finite element space: A unified bone material mapping strategy / $c P. Henyš, M. Vořechovský, J. Stebel, M. Kuchař, P. Exner
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The spatially varying mechanical properties in finite element models of bone are most often derived from bone density data obtained via quantitative computed tomography. The key step is to accurately and efficiently map the density given in voxels to the finite element mesh. METHODS: The density projection is first formulated in least-squares terms and then discretized using a continuous and discontinuous variant of the finite element method. Both discretization variants are compared with the nodal and element approaches known from the literature. FINDINGS: In terms of accuracy in the L2 norm, energy distance and efficiency, the discontinuous zero-order variant appears to be the most advantageous. The proposed variant sufficiently preserves the spectrum of density at the edges, while keeping computational cost low. INTERPRETATION: The continuous finite element method is analogous to the nodal formulation in the literature, while the discontinuous finite element method is analogous to the element formulation. The two variants differ in terms of implementation, computational cost and ability to preserve the density spectrum. These differences cannot be described and measured by known indirect methods from the literature.
- 650 _2
- $a kostní denzita $7 D015519
- 650 12
- $a kosti a kostní tkáň $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001842
- 650 _2
- $a analýza metodou konečných prvků $7 D020342
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vořechovský, Miroslav $u Institute of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Veveří 331/95, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Stebel, Jan $u Institute of New Technologies and Applied Informatics, Faculty of Mechatronics, Informatics and Interdisciplinary Studies, Technical University of Liberec, Studentská 1402/2, 46117 Liberec, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kuchař, Michal $u Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Šimkova 870, 50003, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Exner, Pavel $u Institute of New Technologies and Applied Informatics, Faculty of Mechatronics, Informatics and Interdisciplinary Studies, Technical University of Liberec, Studentská 1402/2, 46117 Liberec, Czech Republic. Electronic address: pavel.exner@tul.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001120 $t Clinical biomechanics $x 1879-1271 $g Roč. 97, č. - (2022), s. 105704
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35849946 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221017 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20221031100128 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1854820 $s 1176591
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 97 $c - $d 105704 $e 20220615 $i 1879-1271 $m Clinical biomechanics $n Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) $x MED00001120
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20221017