• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Autonomic Changes Are More Durable After Radiofrequency Than Pulsed Electric Field Pulmonary Vein Ablation

P. Stojadinović, D. Wichterle, P. Peichl, H. Nakagawa, R. Čihák, J. Hašková, J. Kautzner

. 2022 ; 8 (7) : 895-904. [pub] 20220629

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22025342

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency (RF) energy is associated with a collateral ganglionated plexi ablation. Pulsed electric field (PEF) is a nonthermal energy source that preferentially affects the myocardial cells and spares neural tissue. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether PVI by a PEF compared with RF energy will result in less prominent alteration of the cardiac autonomic nervous system. METHODS: A total of 31 patients with atrial fibrillation underwent PVI using a novel lattice-tip catheter and PEF energy (n = 18) or a conventional irrigated-tip catheter and RF energy (n = 13). The response of the sinoatrial node and atrioventricular node to extracardiac high-frequency, high-output, right vagal nerve stimulation was evaluated at baseline and during and at the end of the ablation procedure. Substantial reduction in responsiveness was arbitrarily defined as stimulation-inducible pause <1.5 seconds. RESULTS: Reduced response of the sinoatrial node was documented in 13 of 13 (100%) and 6 of 18 (33%) patients (P = 0.0001) in RF and PEF groups, respectively. Reduced response of the atrioventricular node was found in 10 of 11 (93%) and 6 of 18 (33%) patients (P = 0.002) in RF and PEF groups, respectively. The major effects were observed predominantly during ablation around the right pulmonary veins. Early recovery of ganglionated plexi function was noticed only in the PEF ablation group. RF ablation resulted in higher acceleration of the sinus rhythm compared with PEF ablation (20 ± 13 beats/min vs 12 ± 10 beats/min; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: PEF compared with RF energy used for PVI induces significantly weaker and less durable suppression of cardiac autonomic regulations.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22025342
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221031100826.0
007      
ta
008      
221017s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.04.017 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35863816
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Stojadinović, Predrag $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: stop@ikem.cz
245    10
$a Autonomic Changes Are More Durable After Radiofrequency Than Pulsed Electric Field Pulmonary Vein Ablation / $c P. Stojadinović, D. Wichterle, P. Peichl, H. Nakagawa, R. Čihák, J. Hašková, J. Kautzner
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency (RF) energy is associated with a collateral ganglionated plexi ablation. Pulsed electric field (PEF) is a nonthermal energy source that preferentially affects the myocardial cells and spares neural tissue. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether PVI by a PEF compared with RF energy will result in less prominent alteration of the cardiac autonomic nervous system. METHODS: A total of 31 patients with atrial fibrillation underwent PVI using a novel lattice-tip catheter and PEF energy (n = 18) or a conventional irrigated-tip catheter and RF energy (n = 13). The response of the sinoatrial node and atrioventricular node to extracardiac high-frequency, high-output, right vagal nerve stimulation was evaluated at baseline and during and at the end of the ablation procedure. Substantial reduction in responsiveness was arbitrarily defined as stimulation-inducible pause <1.5 seconds. RESULTS: Reduced response of the sinoatrial node was documented in 13 of 13 (100%) and 6 of 18 (33%) patients (P = 0.0001) in RF and PEF groups, respectively. Reduced response of the atrioventricular node was found in 10 of 11 (93%) and 6 of 18 (33%) patients (P = 0.002) in RF and PEF groups, respectively. The major effects were observed predominantly during ablation around the right pulmonary veins. Early recovery of ganglionated plexi function was noticed only in the PEF ablation group. RF ablation resulted in higher acceleration of the sinus rhythm compared with PEF ablation (20 ± 13 beats/min vs 12 ± 10 beats/min; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: PEF compared with RF energy used for PVI induces significantly weaker and less durable suppression of cardiac autonomic regulations.
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    _2
$a autonomní nervový systém $7 D001341
650    12
$a katetrizační ablace $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D017115
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a venae pulmonales $x chirurgie $7 D011667
650    _2
$a nodus sinuatrialis $7 D012849
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Wichterle, Dan $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Peichl, Petr $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Nakagawa, Hiroshi $u Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
700    1_
$a Čihák, Robert $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hašková, Jana $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kautzner, Josef $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00193518 $t JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $x 2405-5018 $g Roč. 8, č. 7 (2022), s. 895-904
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35863816 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221017 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221031100824 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1854850 $s 1176632
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 8 $c 7 $d 895-904 $e 20220629 $i 2405-5018 $m JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $n JACC Clin Electrophysiol $x MED00193518
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20221017

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...