-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Influence of school backpack load on plantar foot pressure during walking in 9-11 years old girls
Š. Balkó, JJ. Tufano, M. Jelínek, Z. Svoboda, M. Błaszczyszyn, F. Vaverka
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004
ProQuest Central
od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2006-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1993
PubMed
36239367
DOI
10.21101/cejph.a7109
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- chůze * MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- školy * MeSH
- tlak MeSH
- zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the relative load of the midfoot and the metatarsals of both feet when schoolchildren walked with backpacks of different loads. METHODS: A group of 12 healthy girls (9.9 ± 0.8 years; 33.8 ± 6.7 kg, 1.40 ± 0.10 m) walked barefoot to assess plantar pressures during gait without load (L0%) and with a loaded backpack equal to 10% (L10%) and 20% (L20%) of their body weight. A Footscan® system (RSscan International, Belgium) was used to determine the contact area and relative pressure impulse in the midfoot and metatarsals on the dominant (DL) and non-dominant legs (NL). RESULTS: The effect of load was significant for the contact area of the midfoot for both NL (p = 0.013) and DL (p = 0.001). In the metatarsals, there was significantly greater relative impulse during L10% compared to L0% in the first (p = 0.041) and second (p = 0.050) metatarsals of the DL. Comparing the NL and DL showed significantly greater relative impulse on the DL in the fourth metatarsal during L10% (p = 0.023), greater contact area in the fifth metatarsal during L0% (p = 0.050), and greater impulse in the midfoot during L20% (p = 0.028) on the NL. CONCLUSIONS: The school backpack load influences relative plantar pressure distribution, especially in the midfoot. Further, our findings suggest greater propulsion of the DL and supporting function of the NL.
Faculty of Education University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Faculty of Physical Culture Palacky University in Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy Opole University of Technology Opole Poland
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22026963
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230314084647.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221108s2022 xr a f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21101/cejph.a7109 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36239367
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Balkó, Štefan, $u Faculty of Education, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic $d 1980- $7 xx0212232
- 245 10
- $a Influence of school backpack load on plantar foot pressure during walking in 9-11 years old girls / $c Š. Balkó, JJ. Tufano, M. Jelínek, Z. Svoboda, M. Błaszczyszyn, F. Vaverka
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the relative load of the midfoot and the metatarsals of both feet when schoolchildren walked with backpacks of different loads. METHODS: A group of 12 healthy girls (9.9 ± 0.8 years; 33.8 ± 6.7 kg, 1.40 ± 0.10 m) walked barefoot to assess plantar pressures during gait without load (L0%) and with a loaded backpack equal to 10% (L10%) and 20% (L20%) of their body weight. A Footscan® system (RSscan International, Belgium) was used to determine the contact area and relative pressure impulse in the midfoot and metatarsals on the dominant (DL) and non-dominant legs (NL). RESULTS: The effect of load was significant for the contact area of the midfoot for both NL (p = 0.013) and DL (p = 0.001). In the metatarsals, there was significantly greater relative impulse during L10% compared to L0% in the first (p = 0.041) and second (p = 0.050) metatarsals of the DL. Comparing the NL and DL showed significantly greater relative impulse on the DL in the fourth metatarsal during L10% (p = 0.023), greater contact area in the fifth metatarsal during L0% (p = 0.050), and greater impulse in the midfoot during L20% (p = 0.028) on the NL. CONCLUSIONS: The school backpack load influences relative plantar pressure distribution, especially in the midfoot. Further, our findings suggest greater propulsion of the DL and supporting function of the NL.
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a tlak $7 D011312
- 650 12
- $a školy $7 D012574
- 650 12
- $a chůze $7 D016138
- 650 _2
- $a zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému $7 D016474
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Tufano, James Joseph, $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1988- $7 xx0230753
- 700 1_
- $a Jelínek, Marek $u Faculty of Health Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic $7 xx0171107
- 700 1_
- $a Svoboda, Zdeněk $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0098601
- 700 1_
- $a Błaszczyszyn, Monika $u Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Vaverka, František, $u Faculty of Education, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $d 1938- $7 jn20000402493
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $x 1210-7778 $g Roč. 30, č. 3 (2022), s. 185-189
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36239367 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230314084644 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1896140 $s 1178270
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 30 $c 3 $d 185-189 $e 20220930 $i 1210-7778 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $n Cent. Eur. J. Public Health $x MED00001083
- LZP __
- $b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20221108