Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The relations between Czech undergraduates' motivation and emotion in self-regulated learning, learning engagement, and academic success in blended course designs: Consistency between theory-driven and data-driven approaches

F. Han, J. Vaculíková, K. Juklová

. 2022 ; 13 (-) : 1001202. [pub] 20221118

Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

Combining theory-driven and data-driven approaches, this study used both self-reported and observational measures to examine: (1) the joint contributions of students' self-reported undergraduates' motivation and emotion in their self-regulated learning, their observed online learning interactions, and their academic success in blended course designs; and (2) the extent to which the self-reported and observational measures were consistent with each other. The participants in the study were 54 social sciences undergraduates in the Czech Republic. The participants' self-reported self-efficacy, intrinsic goals, and anxiety were assessed using a Czech version of three scales from the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Their online engagement was represented by students' observed frequency of interactions with the six online learning activities recorded in the learning management system. The results of a hierarchical regression analysis showed that the self-reported and observational measures together could explain 71% of variance in academic success, significantly improving explanatory power over using self-reported measures alone. Departing from the theory-driven approach, students were clustered as better and poorer self-regulated learners by their self-reports, and one-way ANOVAs showed that better self-regulated learners had significantly more frequent online interactions with four out of six online learning activities and better final exam results. Departing from the data-driven approach, students were clustered as higher and lower online-engaged learners by the observed frequency of their interaction with online learning activities. One-way ANOVAs showed that higher online-engaged learners also reported having higher self-efficacy and lower anxiety. Furthermore, the strong association between the students' profiles in both self-reported measures and observational measures in cross-tabulation analyses showed that the majority of better self-regulated learners by self-reporting also had higher online engagement by observation, whereas the majority of poorer self-regulated learners by self-reporting were lower online-engaged learners, demonstrating consistency between theory-driven and data-driven approaches.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22031243
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230127131108.0
007      
ta
008      
230119s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001202 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36467195
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Han, Feifei $u Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia $u Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czechia
245    14
$a The relations between Czech undergraduates' motivation and emotion in self-regulated learning, learning engagement, and academic success in blended course designs: Consistency between theory-driven and data-driven approaches / $c F. Han, J. Vaculíková, K. Juklová
520    9_
$a Combining theory-driven and data-driven approaches, this study used both self-reported and observational measures to examine: (1) the joint contributions of students' self-reported undergraduates' motivation and emotion in their self-regulated learning, their observed online learning interactions, and their academic success in blended course designs; and (2) the extent to which the self-reported and observational measures were consistent with each other. The participants in the study were 54 social sciences undergraduates in the Czech Republic. The participants' self-reported self-efficacy, intrinsic goals, and anxiety were assessed using a Czech version of three scales from the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Their online engagement was represented by students' observed frequency of interactions with the six online learning activities recorded in the learning management system. The results of a hierarchical regression analysis showed that the self-reported and observational measures together could explain 71% of variance in academic success, significantly improving explanatory power over using self-reported measures alone. Departing from the theory-driven approach, students were clustered as better and poorer self-regulated learners by their self-reports, and one-way ANOVAs showed that better self-regulated learners had significantly more frequent online interactions with four out of six online learning activities and better final exam results. Departing from the data-driven approach, students were clustered as higher and lower online-engaged learners by the observed frequency of their interaction with online learning activities. One-way ANOVAs showed that higher online-engaged learners also reported having higher self-efficacy and lower anxiety. Furthermore, the strong association between the students' profiles in both self-reported measures and observational measures in cross-tabulation analyses showed that the majority of better self-regulated learners by self-reporting also had higher online engagement by observation, whereas the majority of poorer self-regulated learners by self-reporting were lower online-engaged learners, demonstrating consistency between theory-driven and data-driven approaches.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vaculíková, Jitka $u Research Centre of FHS, Faculty of Humanities, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, Czechia
700    1_
$a Juklová, Kateřina $u Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 13, č. - (2022), s. 1001202
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36467195 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230119 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230127131100 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1889421 $s 1182576
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 13 $c - $d 1001202 $e 20221118 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230119

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...