-
Something wrong with this record ?
The relations between Czech undergraduates' motivation and emotion in self-regulated learning, learning engagement, and academic success in blended course designs: Consistency between theory-driven and data-driven approaches
F. Han, J. Vaculíková, K. Juklová
Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2010
Free Medical Journals
from 2010
PubMed Central
from 2010
Europe PubMed Central
from 2010
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Combining theory-driven and data-driven approaches, this study used both self-reported and observational measures to examine: (1) the joint contributions of students' self-reported undergraduates' motivation and emotion in their self-regulated learning, their observed online learning interactions, and their academic success in blended course designs; and (2) the extent to which the self-reported and observational measures were consistent with each other. The participants in the study were 54 social sciences undergraduates in the Czech Republic. The participants' self-reported self-efficacy, intrinsic goals, and anxiety were assessed using a Czech version of three scales from the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Their online engagement was represented by students' observed frequency of interactions with the six online learning activities recorded in the learning management system. The results of a hierarchical regression analysis showed that the self-reported and observational measures together could explain 71% of variance in academic success, significantly improving explanatory power over using self-reported measures alone. Departing from the theory-driven approach, students were clustered as better and poorer self-regulated learners by their self-reports, and one-way ANOVAs showed that better self-regulated learners had significantly more frequent online interactions with four out of six online learning activities and better final exam results. Departing from the data-driven approach, students were clustered as higher and lower online-engaged learners by the observed frequency of their interaction with online learning activities. One-way ANOVAs showed that higher online-engaged learners also reported having higher self-efficacy and lower anxiety. Furthermore, the strong association between the students' profiles in both self-reported measures and observational measures in cross-tabulation analyses showed that the majority of better self-regulated learners by self-reporting also had higher online engagement by observation, whereas the majority of poorer self-regulated learners by self-reporting were lower online-engaged learners, demonstrating consistency between theory-driven and data-driven approaches.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22031243
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230127131108.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230119s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001202 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36467195
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Han, Feifei $u Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia $u Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 245 14
- $a The relations between Czech undergraduates' motivation and emotion in self-regulated learning, learning engagement, and academic success in blended course designs: Consistency between theory-driven and data-driven approaches / $c F. Han, J. Vaculíková, K. Juklová
- 520 9_
- $a Combining theory-driven and data-driven approaches, this study used both self-reported and observational measures to examine: (1) the joint contributions of students' self-reported undergraduates' motivation and emotion in their self-regulated learning, their observed online learning interactions, and their academic success in blended course designs; and (2) the extent to which the self-reported and observational measures were consistent with each other. The participants in the study were 54 social sciences undergraduates in the Czech Republic. The participants' self-reported self-efficacy, intrinsic goals, and anxiety were assessed using a Czech version of three scales from the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Their online engagement was represented by students' observed frequency of interactions with the six online learning activities recorded in the learning management system. The results of a hierarchical regression analysis showed that the self-reported and observational measures together could explain 71% of variance in academic success, significantly improving explanatory power over using self-reported measures alone. Departing from the theory-driven approach, students were clustered as better and poorer self-regulated learners by their self-reports, and one-way ANOVAs showed that better self-regulated learners had significantly more frequent online interactions with four out of six online learning activities and better final exam results. Departing from the data-driven approach, students were clustered as higher and lower online-engaged learners by the observed frequency of their interaction with online learning activities. One-way ANOVAs showed that higher online-engaged learners also reported having higher self-efficacy and lower anxiety. Furthermore, the strong association between the students' profiles in both self-reported measures and observational measures in cross-tabulation analyses showed that the majority of better self-regulated learners by self-reporting also had higher online engagement by observation, whereas the majority of poorer self-regulated learners by self-reporting were lower online-engaged learners, demonstrating consistency between theory-driven and data-driven approaches.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vaculíková, Jitka $u Research Centre of FHS, Faculty of Humanities, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Juklová, Kateřina $u Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 13, č. - (2022), s. 1001202
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36467195 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230119 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230127131100 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1889421 $s 1182576
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 13 $c - $d 1001202 $e 20221118 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230119