-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial
V. Vafek, T. Skříšovská, M. Kosinová, E. Klabusayová, T. Musilová, T. Kramplová, J. Djakow, J. Klučka, J. Kalina, P. Štourač
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2014
Free Medical Journals
od 2014
PubMed Central
od 2014
Europe PubMed Central
od 2014
ProQuest Central
od 2021-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2014-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2014-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2021-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2021-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2014
PubMed
36360339
DOI
10.3390/children9111611
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Currently, ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is recommended in pediatric patients. However, the clinical practice may vary. The primary aim of this study was the overall success rate and the first attempt success rate in ultrasound-guided CVC insertion versus anatomic-based CVC insertion in pediatric patients. The secondary aim was the incidence of associated complications and the procedural time. The physician could freely choose the cannulation method and venous approach. Data were collected for 10 months. Overall, 179 patients were assessed for eligibility and 107 patients were included. In almost half of the patients (48.6%), the percutaneous puncture was performed by real-time ultrasound navigation. In 51.4% of the patients, the puncture was performed by the landmark method. The overall success rate was 100% (n = 52) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group, 96.4% (n = 53) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.496). The first percutaneous puncture success rate was 57.7% (n = 30) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group and 45.5% (n = 25) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.460). The data show a higher overall success rate and the first success rate in the US-guided CVC insertion group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Paediatric Intensive Care Unit NH Hospital Inc 26801 Hořovice Czech Republic
RECETOX Faculty of Science Masaryk University Kotlářská 2 61137 Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22031464
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250203113753.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230119s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/children9111611 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36360339
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Vafek, Václav $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000213707086
- 245 10
- $a Central Venous Catheter Cannulation in Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care: A Prospective Observational Trial / $c V. Vafek, T. Skříšovská, M. Kosinová, E. Klabusayová, T. Musilová, T. Kramplová, J. Djakow, J. Klučka, J. Kalina, P. Štourač
- 520 9_
- $a Currently, ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is recommended in pediatric patients. However, the clinical practice may vary. The primary aim of this study was the overall success rate and the first attempt success rate in ultrasound-guided CVC insertion versus anatomic-based CVC insertion in pediatric patients. The secondary aim was the incidence of associated complications and the procedural time. The physician could freely choose the cannulation method and venous approach. Data were collected for 10 months. Overall, 179 patients were assessed for eligibility and 107 patients were included. In almost half of the patients (48.6%), the percutaneous puncture was performed by real-time ultrasound navigation. In 51.4% of the patients, the puncture was performed by the landmark method. The overall success rate was 100% (n = 52) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group, 96.4% (n = 53) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.496). The first percutaneous puncture success rate was 57.7% (n = 30) in the real-time ultrasound navigation group and 45.5% (n = 25) in the landmark insertion group, (p = 0.460). The data show a higher overall success rate and the first success rate in the US-guided CVC insertion group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Skříšovská, Tamara $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0328676
- 700 1_
- $a Kosinová, Martina $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Klabusayová, Eva $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000250739415
- 700 1_
- $a Bönischová, Tereza $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0259281
- 700 1_
- $a Kramplová, Tereza $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Djakow, Jana $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, NH Hospital Inc., 26801 Hořovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Klučka, Jozef $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kalina, Jiří $u RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Štourač, Petr $u Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00198716 $t Children $x 2227-9067 $g Roč. 9, č. 11 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36360339 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230119 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250203113751 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1889503 $s 1182797
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 9 $c 11 $e 20221023 $i 2227-9067 $m Children $n Children (Basel) $x MED00198716
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230119