-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Mutual Role Expectations by Patients and General Practitioners-A Mixed Methods Study on Complementarity
B. Plagg, A. Engl, G. Piccoliori, H. Atz, U. Becker, J. Kiem, V. Barbieri, K. Eisendle, CJ. Wiedermann, SU. Elsen, WA. Lorenz
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2013
PubMed Central
od 2013
Europe PubMed Central
od 2013
ProQuest Central
od 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2013-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2013-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2013
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Changes in public attitudes toward "authorities" in general, as well as shifts in medical practice toward participative models of diagnosis and treatment, imply fundamental transformations in the patient-doctor relationship. However, consistency in reciprocal role expectations cannot be assumed, and this study reveals significant discrepancies in attitudes and behaviors in primary health consultations. METHODS: We conducted a study in the tri-lingual northeastern Italian region of South Tyrol to determine whether perceptions of the patient's role were congruent or differed. In a mixed method approach, the quantitative research part consisted of a survey with 34 identical questions for general practitioners (n = 109) and adult primary care patients (n = 506) on verbal communication, self-initiative and health literacy, interpersonal and social qualities of the patient-physician relationship, and formal aspects of the consultation. Patients were interviewed via telephone, and general practitioners responded online. In the qualitative part, 26 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with the patients and analyzed. RESULTS: General practitioners considered patients' communicative efforts (p < 0.001), self-initiative (p < 0.001), compliance (p = 0.0026), and openness regarding psychosocial issues (p < 0.001) to be significantly more important, whereas patients showed a tendency to give increased importance to formal aspects such as politeness and hygiene (p < 0.001). Perception of the patient's role differed significantly between the Italian and German linguistic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and general practitioners differ in their understanding of patients' roles. These data suggest that a considerable proportion of the population lacks a clear and tangible idea of the active role they could play in consultations. Targeted information on the identified aspects of patient-provider communication may facilitate participatory behavior and positively impact the longitudinal quality of the patient-general practitioner relationship.
Apollis Institute for Social Research and Opinion Polling 39100 Bolzano Italy
Faculty of Education Free University of Bolzano 39100 Bolzano Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22031488
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230127131203.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230119s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/healthcare10102101 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36292548
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Plagg, Barbara $u Institute of General Practice and Public Health, College for Health Care Professions-Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy $u Faculty of Education, Free University of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000261167504
- 245 10
- $a Mutual Role Expectations by Patients and General Practitioners-A Mixed Methods Study on Complementarity / $c B. Plagg, A. Engl, G. Piccoliori, H. Atz, U. Becker, J. Kiem, V. Barbieri, K. Eisendle, CJ. Wiedermann, SU. Elsen, WA. Lorenz
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Changes in public attitudes toward "authorities" in general, as well as shifts in medical practice toward participative models of diagnosis and treatment, imply fundamental transformations in the patient-doctor relationship. However, consistency in reciprocal role expectations cannot be assumed, and this study reveals significant discrepancies in attitudes and behaviors in primary health consultations. METHODS: We conducted a study in the tri-lingual northeastern Italian region of South Tyrol to determine whether perceptions of the patient's role were congruent or differed. In a mixed method approach, the quantitative research part consisted of a survey with 34 identical questions for general practitioners (n = 109) and adult primary care patients (n = 506) on verbal communication, self-initiative and health literacy, interpersonal and social qualities of the patient-physician relationship, and formal aspects of the consultation. Patients were interviewed via telephone, and general practitioners responded online. In the qualitative part, 26 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with the patients and analyzed. RESULTS: General practitioners considered patients' communicative efforts (p < 0.001), self-initiative (p < 0.001), compliance (p = 0.0026), and openness regarding psychosocial issues (p < 0.001) to be significantly more important, whereas patients showed a tendency to give increased importance to formal aspects such as politeness and hygiene (p < 0.001). Perception of the patient's role differed significantly between the Italian and German linguistic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and general practitioners differ in their understanding of patients' roles. These data suggest that a considerable proportion of the population lacks a clear and tangible idea of the active role they could play in consultations. Targeted information on the identified aspects of patient-provider communication may facilitate participatory behavior and positively impact the longitudinal quality of the patient-general practitioner relationship.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Engl, Adolf $u Institute of General Practice and Public Health, College for Health Care Professions-Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Piccoliori, Giuliano $u Institute of General Practice and Public Health, College for Health Care Professions-Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Atz, Hermann $u Apollis-Institute for Social Research and Opinion Polling, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Becker, Ulrich $u Apollis-Institute for Social Research and Opinion Polling, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Kiem, Johann $u Faculty of Education, Free University of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Barbieri, Verena $u Institute of General Practice and Public Health, College for Health Care Professions-Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Eisendle, Klaus $u Institute of General Practice and Public Health, College for Health Care Professions-Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000282349964
- 700 1_
- $a Wiedermann, Christian Josef $u Institute of General Practice and Public Health, College for Health Care Professions-Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy $u Department of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and HTA, University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology-Tyrol, 6060 Hall in Tyrol, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000246398195
- 700 1_
- $a Elsen, Susanne Ursula $u Faculty of Education, Free University of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000215807435
- 700 1_
- $a Lorenz, Walter August $u Faculty of Education, Free University of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy $u Department of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, 18200 Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00200150 $t Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) $x 2227-9032 $g Roč. 10, č. 10 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36292548 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230119 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230127131155 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1889513 $s 1182821
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 10 $c 10 $e 20221020 $i 2227-9032 $m Healthcare $n Healthcare (Basel) $x MED00200150
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230119