Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Randomized clinical trial: A double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 or 40 mg versus esomeprazole 40 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease and partial response to a healing dose of a proton-pump inhibitor

J. Tack, B. Vladimirov, I. Horny, CF. Chong, J. Eisner, R. Czerniak, Y. Takanami

. 2023 ; 35 (1) : e14468. [pub] 20220930

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, klinické zkoušky, fáze II, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22032072
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1998-12-01 do Před 1 rokem
Wiley Free Content od 1997 do Před 18 měsíci

BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are cornerstone treatments for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, evidence suggests that most patients exhibit partial response to PPIs, suggesting the need for novel therapies that can provide an improved and sustained increase in gastric pH. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the effect of vonoprazan, a novel, orally active small-molecule potassium-competitive acid blocker, versus esomeprazole, a PPI, in preventing heartburn symptoms over a 4-week treatment period in patients with GERD and a partial response to esomeprazole treatment. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted between 2016 and 2018 at 39 sites across Europe and designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (q.d.) and 40 mg q.d. versus esomeprazole 40 mg q.d. after 1:1:1 randomization of symptomatic patients with GERD and a partial response to a healing dose of esomeprazole. RESULTS: Overall, 256 eligible patients (female, 59.4%; mean age, 52.6 years) received vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 85), vonoprazan 40 mg (n = 85), or esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 86); mean (SD) percentages of heartburn-free 24-h periods during double-blind treatment were 36.7% (33.4%), 36.5% (35.6%), and 38.4% (34.8%), respectively, with no intergroup statistical significance. Vonoprazan exposure increased proportionally from the 20-mg to 40-mg dose (mean Cmax : 23.3 ng/ml to 47.1 ng/ml, respectively). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild, with no deaths reported. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference in efficacy and safety was observed among treatment groups, and vonoprazan was well tolerated. The trial is registered with the National Board of Health (EudraCT: 2015-001154-14) database.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22032072
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131150722.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/nmo.14468 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36178335
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Tack, Jan $u Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
245    10
$a Randomized clinical trial: A double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 or 40 mg versus esomeprazole 40 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease and partial response to a healing dose of a proton-pump inhibitor / $c J. Tack, B. Vladimirov, I. Horny, CF. Chong, J. Eisner, R. Czerniak, Y. Takanami
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are cornerstone treatments for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, evidence suggests that most patients exhibit partial response to PPIs, suggesting the need for novel therapies that can provide an improved and sustained increase in gastric pH. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the effect of vonoprazan, a novel, orally active small-molecule potassium-competitive acid blocker, versus esomeprazole, a PPI, in preventing heartburn symptoms over a 4-week treatment period in patients with GERD and a partial response to esomeprazole treatment. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted between 2016 and 2018 at 39 sites across Europe and designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (q.d.) and 40 mg q.d. versus esomeprazole 40 mg q.d. after 1:1:1 randomization of symptomatic patients with GERD and a partial response to a healing dose of esomeprazole. RESULTS: Overall, 256 eligible patients (female, 59.4%; mean age, 52.6 years) received vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 85), vonoprazan 40 mg (n = 85), or esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 86); mean (SD) percentages of heartburn-free 24-h periods during double-blind treatment were 36.7% (33.4%), 36.5% (35.6%), and 38.4% (34.8%), respectively, with no intergroup statistical significance. Vonoprazan exposure increased proportionally from the 20-mg to 40-mg dose (mean Cmax : 23.3 ng/ml to 47.1 ng/ml, respectively). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild, with no deaths reported. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference in efficacy and safety was observed among treatment groups, and vonoprazan was well tolerated. The trial is registered with the National Board of Health (EudraCT: 2015-001154-14) database.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a esomeprazol $x terapeutické užití $7 D064098
650    _2
$a inhibitory protonové pumpy $x terapeutické užití $7 D054328
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    12
$a gastroezofageální reflux $x farmakoterapie $x diagnóza $7 D005764
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a pyróza $x farmakoterapie $7 D006356
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze II $7 D017427
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Vladimirov, Borislav $u Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital "Queen Giovanna- ISUL", Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
700    1_
$a Horny, Ivo $u Department of Gastroenterology and Internal medicine, Strakonice Hospital, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chong, Chui Fung $u Currently Hoffmann-La Roche, Formerly Takeda Development Center Asia, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Eisner, Jessica $u Formerly Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, USA
700    1_
$a Czerniak, Richard $u Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
700    1_
$a Takanami, Yohei $u Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
773    0_
$w MED00005047 $t Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society $x 1365-2982 $g Roč. 35, č. 1 (2023), s. e14468
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36178335 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131150718 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891068 $s 1183407
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 35 $c 1 $d e14468 $e 20220930 $i 1365-2982 $m Neurogastroenterology and motility $n Neurogastroenterol Motil $x MED00005047
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...