Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Gut microbe Lactiplantibacillus plantarum undergoes different evolutionary trajectories between insects and mammals

E. Maritan, M. Gallo, D. Srutkova, A. Jelinkova, O. Benada, O. Kofronova, NF. Silva-Soares, T. Hudcovic, I. Gifford, JE. Barrick, M. Schwarzer, ME. Martino

. 2022 ; 20 (1) : 290. [pub] 20221227

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Animals form complex symbiotic associations with their gut microbes, whose evolution is determined by an intricate network of host and environmental factors. In many insects, such as Drosophila melanogaster, the microbiome is flexible, environmentally determined, and less diverse than in mammals. In contrast, mammals maintain complex multispecies consortia that are able to colonize and persist in the gastrointestinal tract. Understanding the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of gut microbes in different hosts is challenging. This requires disentangling the ecological factors of selection, determining the timescales over which evolution occurs, and elucidating the architecture of such evolutionary patterns. RESULTS: We employ experimental evolution to track the pace of the evolution of a common gut commensal, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, within invertebrate (Drosophila melanogaster) and vertebrate (Mus musculus) hosts and their respective diets. We show that in Drosophila, the nutritional environment dictates microbial evolution, while the host benefits L. plantarum growth only over short ecological timescales. By contrast, in a mammalian animal model, L. plantarum evolution results to be divergent between the host intestine and its diet, both phenotypically (i.e., host-evolved populations show higher adaptation to the host intestinal environment) and genomically. Here, both the emergence of hypermutators and the high persistence of mutated genes within the host's environment strongly differed from the low variation observed in the host's nutritional environment alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that L. plantarum evolution diverges between insects and mammals. While the symbiosis between Drosophila and L. plantarum is mainly determined by the host diet, in mammals, the host and its intrinsic factors play a critical role in selection and influence both the phenotypic and genomic evolution of its gut microbes, as well as the outcome of their symbiosis.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22032098
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131151405.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12915-022-01477-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36575413
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Maritan, Elisa $u Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
245    10
$a Gut microbe Lactiplantibacillus plantarum undergoes different evolutionary trajectories between insects and mammals / $c E. Maritan, M. Gallo, D. Srutkova, A. Jelinkova, O. Benada, O. Kofronova, NF. Silva-Soares, T. Hudcovic, I. Gifford, JE. Barrick, M. Schwarzer, ME. Martino
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Animals form complex symbiotic associations with their gut microbes, whose evolution is determined by an intricate network of host and environmental factors. In many insects, such as Drosophila melanogaster, the microbiome is flexible, environmentally determined, and less diverse than in mammals. In contrast, mammals maintain complex multispecies consortia that are able to colonize and persist in the gastrointestinal tract. Understanding the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of gut microbes in different hosts is challenging. This requires disentangling the ecological factors of selection, determining the timescales over which evolution occurs, and elucidating the architecture of such evolutionary patterns. RESULTS: We employ experimental evolution to track the pace of the evolution of a common gut commensal, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, within invertebrate (Drosophila melanogaster) and vertebrate (Mus musculus) hosts and their respective diets. We show that in Drosophila, the nutritional environment dictates microbial evolution, while the host benefits L. plantarum growth only over short ecological timescales. By contrast, in a mammalian animal model, L. plantarum evolution results to be divergent between the host intestine and its diet, both phenotypically (i.e., host-evolved populations show higher adaptation to the host intestinal environment) and genomically. Here, both the emergence of hypermutators and the high persistence of mutated genes within the host's environment strongly differed from the low variation observed in the host's nutritional environment alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that L. plantarum evolution diverges between insects and mammals. While the symbiosis between Drosophila and L. plantarum is mainly determined by the host diet, in mammals, the host and its intrinsic factors play a critical role in selection and influence both the phenotypic and genomic evolution of its gut microbes, as well as the outcome of their symbiosis.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a Drosophila melanogaster $x genetika $7 D004331
650    12
$a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
650    _2
$a Drosophila $7 D004330
650    12
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a savci $7 D008322
650    _2
$a symbióza $7 D013559
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. $7 D013486
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Gallo, Marialaura $u Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
700    1_
$a Srutkova, Dagmar $u Laboratory of Gnotobiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Novy Hradek, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jelinkova, Anna $u Laboratory of Gnotobiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Novy Hradek, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Benada, Oldrich $u Laboratory of Molecular Structure Characterization, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kofronova, Olga $u Laboratory of Molecular Structure Characterization, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Silva-Soares, Nuno F $u Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
700    1_
$a Hudcovic, Tomas $u Laboratory of Gnotobiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Novy Hradek, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gifford, Isaac $u Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
700    1_
$a Barrick, Jeffrey E $u Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
700    1_
$a Schwarzer, Martin $u Laboratory of Gnotobiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Novy Hradek, Czech Republic. schwarzer@biomed.cas.cz
700    1_
$a Martino, Maria Elena $u Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. mariaelena.martino@unipd.it
773    0_
$w MED00008168 $t BMC biology $x 1741-7007 $g Roč. 20, č. 1 (2022), s. 290
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36575413 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131151401 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891090 $s 1183433
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 20 $c 1 $d 290 $e 20221227 $i 1741-7007 $m BMC biology $n BMC Biol $x MED00008168
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...