Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy Practices in Pediatric Intensive Care Units Across Europe

M. Daverio, G. Cortina, A. Jones, Z. Ricci, D. Demirkol, P. Raymakers-Janssen, F. Lion, C. Camilo, V. Stojanovic, S. Grazioli, T. Zaoral, K. Masjosthusmann, I. Vankessel, A. Deep, Critical Care Nephrology Section of the European Society of...

. 2022 ; 5 (12) : e2246901. [pub] 20221201

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22032276

IMPORTANCE: Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is the preferred method of kidney support for children with critical illness in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). However, there are no data on the current CKRT management practices in European PICUs. OBJECTIVE: To describe current CKRT practices across European PICUs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional survey of PICUs in 20 European countries was conducted by the Critical Care Nephrology Section of the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care from April 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022. Participants included intensivists and nurses working in European PICUs. The survey was developed in English and distributed using SurveyMonkey. One response from each PICU that provided CKRT was included in the analysis. Data were analyzed from June 1 to June 30, 2022. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Demographic characteristics of European PICUs along with organizational and delivery aspects of CKRT (including prescription, liberation from CKRT, and training and education) were assessed. RESULTS: Of 283 survey responses received, 161 were included in the analysis (response rate, 76%). The attending PICU consultant (70%) and the PICU team (77%) were mainly responsible for CKRT prescription, whereas the PICU nurses were responsible for circuit setup (49%) and bedside machine running (67%). Sixty-one percent of permanent nurses received training to use CKRT, with no need for certification or recertification in 36% of PICUs. Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration was the preferred dialytic modality (51%). Circuit priming was performed with normal saline (67%) and blood priming in children weighing less than 10 kg (56%). Median (IQR) CKRT dose was 35 (30-50) mL/kg/h in neonates and 30 (30-40) mL/kg/h in children aged 1 month to 18 years. Forty-one percent of PICUs used regional unfractionated heparin infusion, whereas 35% used citrate-based regional anticoagulation. Filters were changed for filter clotting (53%) and increased transmembrane pressure (47%). For routine circuit changes, 72 hours was the cutoff in 62% of PICUs. Some PICUs (34%) monitored fluid removal goals every 4 hours, with variation from 12 hours (17%) to 24 hours (13%). Fluid removal goals ranged from 1 to 3 mL/kg/h. Liberation from CKRT was performed with a diuretic bolus followed by an infusion (32%) or a diuretic bolus alone (19%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This survey study found a wide variation in current CKRT practice, including organizational aspects, education and training, prescription, and liberation from CKRT, in European PICUs. This finding calls for concerted efforts on the part of the pediatric critical care and nephrology communities to streamline CKRT education and training, research, and guidelines to reduce variation in practice.

Children's Acute Transport Service Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children National Health Service Foundation Trust London United Kingdom

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Martinique Fort de France Martinique

Department of General Pediatrics University Children's Hospital Muenster Muenster Germany

Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Wilhelmina Children's Hospital University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands

Department of Pediatrics Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

Department of Women and Children's Health School of Life Course Sciences King's College London London United Kingdom

Division of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Department of Pediatrics Gynecology and Obstetrics Children's Hospital Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine Geneva Switzerland

Institute for Child and Youth Health Care of Vojvodina Medical Faculty University of Novi Sad Novi Sad Serbia

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Denmark Hill London United Kingdom

Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Istanbul Turkey

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Department of Pediatrics University Hospital of Ostrava Faculty of Medicine Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Department of Woman's and Child's Health University Hospital of Padua Padua Italy

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Meyer Children's Hospital Florence Italy

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Pediatric Department Hospital de Santa Maria North Lisbon University Hospital Center Lisbon Portugal

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22032276
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131151854.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46901 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36520438
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Daverio, Marco $u Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
245    10
$a Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy Practices in Pediatric Intensive Care Units Across Europe / $c M. Daverio, G. Cortina, A. Jones, Z. Ricci, D. Demirkol, P. Raymakers-Janssen, F. Lion, C. Camilo, V. Stojanovic, S. Grazioli, T. Zaoral, K. Masjosthusmann, I. Vankessel, A. Deep, Critical Care Nephrology Section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care
520    9_
$a IMPORTANCE: Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is the preferred method of kidney support for children with critical illness in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). However, there are no data on the current CKRT management practices in European PICUs. OBJECTIVE: To describe current CKRT practices across European PICUs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional survey of PICUs in 20 European countries was conducted by the Critical Care Nephrology Section of the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care from April 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022. Participants included intensivists and nurses working in European PICUs. The survey was developed in English and distributed using SurveyMonkey. One response from each PICU that provided CKRT was included in the analysis. Data were analyzed from June 1 to June 30, 2022. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Demographic characteristics of European PICUs along with organizational and delivery aspects of CKRT (including prescription, liberation from CKRT, and training and education) were assessed. RESULTS: Of 283 survey responses received, 161 were included in the analysis (response rate, 76%). The attending PICU consultant (70%) and the PICU team (77%) were mainly responsible for CKRT prescription, whereas the PICU nurses were responsible for circuit setup (49%) and bedside machine running (67%). Sixty-one percent of permanent nurses received training to use CKRT, with no need for certification or recertification in 36% of PICUs. Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration was the preferred dialytic modality (51%). Circuit priming was performed with normal saline (67%) and blood priming in children weighing less than 10 kg (56%). Median (IQR) CKRT dose was 35 (30-50) mL/kg/h in neonates and 30 (30-40) mL/kg/h in children aged 1 month to 18 years. Forty-one percent of PICUs used regional unfractionated heparin infusion, whereas 35% used citrate-based regional anticoagulation. Filters were changed for filter clotting (53%) and increased transmembrane pressure (47%). For routine circuit changes, 72 hours was the cutoff in 62% of PICUs. Some PICUs (34%) monitored fluid removal goals every 4 hours, with variation from 12 hours (17%) to 24 hours (13%). Fluid removal goals ranged from 1 to 3 mL/kg/h. Liberation from CKRT was performed with a diuretic bolus followed by an infusion (32%) or a diuretic bolus alone (19%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This survey study found a wide variation in current CKRT practice, including organizational aspects, education and training, prescription, and liberation from CKRT, in European PICUs. This finding calls for concerted efforts on the part of the pediatric critical care and nephrology communities to streamline CKRT education and training, research, and guidelines to reduce variation in practice.
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    12
$a kontinuální metody náhrady funkce ledvin $7 D000079664
650    _2
$a heparin $7 D006493
650    _2
$a jednotky intenzivní péče pediatrické $7 D015278
650    _2
$a diuretika $7 D004232
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cortina, Gerard $u Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
700    1_
$a Jones, Andrew $u Children's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Ricci, Zaccaria $u Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
700    1_
$a Demirkol, Demet $u Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Raymakers-Janssen, Paulien $u Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Lion, Francois $u Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
700    1_
$a Camilo, Cristina $u Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, Hospital de Santa Maria-North Lisbon University Hospital Center, Lisbon, Portugal
700    1_
$a Stojanovic, Vesna $u Institute for Child and Youth Health Care of Vojvodina Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
700    1_
$a Grazioli, Serge $u Division of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Zaoral, Tomas $u Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Ostrava, Faculty of Medicine Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Masjosthusmann, Katja $u Department of General Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
700    1_
$a Vankessel, Inge $u Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Deep, Akash $u Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, United Kingdom $u Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
710    2_
$a Critical Care Nephrology Section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care
773    0_
$w MED00205674 $t JAMA network open $x 2574-3805 $g Roč. 5, č. 12 (2022), s. e2246901
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36520438 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131151850 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891184 $s 1183611
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 5 $c 12 $d e2246901 $e 20221201 $i 2574-3805 $m JAMA network open $n JAMA Netw Open $x MED00205674
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...