-
Something wrong with this record ?
The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial
L. Kukralova, V. Dostalova, M. Cihlo, J. Kraus, P. Dostal
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2007
PubMed Central
from 2018
Europe PubMed Central
from 2018
ProQuest Central
from 2018-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2014-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2018-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2007
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Hemodynamics * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Patient Positioning * MeSH
- Prone Position MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Water-Electrolyte Balance MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
Background and Objectives: The effect of individualized hemodynamic management on the intraoperative use of fluids and other hemodynamic interventions in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate how the use of individualized hemodynamic management based on extended continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring modifies intraoperative hemodynamic interventions compared to conventional hemodynamic monitoring with intermittent non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Methods: Fifty adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III) who underwent spinal procedures in the prone position and were then managed with a restrictive fluid strategy were prospectively randomized into intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, individualized hemodynamic management followed a goal-directed protocol based on continuously non-invasively measured blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume variation. In the control group, patients were monitored using intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, and the choice of hemodynamic intervention was left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Results: In the intervention group, more hypotensive episodes (3 (2-4) vs. 1 (0-2), p = 0.0001), higher intraoperative dose of ephedrine (0 (0-10) vs. 0 (0-0) mg, p = 0.0008), and more positive fluid balance (680 (510-937) vs. 270 (196-377) ml, p < 0.0001) were recorded. Intraoperative norepinephrine dose and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Individualized hemodynamic management based on data from extended non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring significantly modified intraoperative hemodynamic management and was associated with a higher number of hemodynamic interventions and a more positive fluid balance.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22032621
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230131151330.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230120s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/medicina58111683 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36422222
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Kukralova, Lucie $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000323479774
- 245 14
- $a The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial / $c L. Kukralova, V. Dostalova, M. Cihlo, J. Kraus, P. Dostal
- 520 9_
- $a Background and Objectives: The effect of individualized hemodynamic management on the intraoperative use of fluids and other hemodynamic interventions in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate how the use of individualized hemodynamic management based on extended continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring modifies intraoperative hemodynamic interventions compared to conventional hemodynamic monitoring with intermittent non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Methods: Fifty adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III) who underwent spinal procedures in the prone position and were then managed with a restrictive fluid strategy were prospectively randomized into intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, individualized hemodynamic management followed a goal-directed protocol based on continuously non-invasively measured blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume variation. In the control group, patients were monitored using intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, and the choice of hemodynamic intervention was left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Results: In the intervention group, more hypotensive episodes (3 (2-4) vs. 1 (0-2), p = 0.0001), higher intraoperative dose of ephedrine (0 (0-10) vs. 0 (0-0) mg, p = 0.0008), and more positive fluid balance (680 (510-937) vs. 270 (196-377) ml, p < 0.0001) were recorded. Intraoperative norepinephrine dose and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Individualized hemodynamic management based on data from extended non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring significantly modified intraoperative hemodynamic management and was associated with a higher number of hemodynamic interventions and a more positive fluid balance.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a pronační poloha $7 D016684
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 12
- $a polohování pacienta $7 D056888
- 650 12
- $a hemodynamika $7 D006439
- 650 _2
- $a vodní a elektrolytová rovnováha $7 D014882
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Dostalova, Vlasta $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Cihlo, Miroslav $u Department of Neurosurgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kraus, Jaroslav $u Department of Ortopedic Surgery, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Sociální Péče 3316/12A, 401 13 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dostal, Pavel $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000196415160
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180386 $t Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) $x 1648-9144 $g Roč. 58, č. 11 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36422222 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230131151326 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1891404 $s 1183956
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 58 $c 11 $e 20221120 $i 1648-9144 $m Medicina $n Medicina (Kaunas) $x MED00180386
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230120