Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial

L. Kukralova, V. Dostalova, M. Cihlo, J. Kraus, P. Dostal

. 2022 ; 58 (11) : . [pub] 20221120

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal Article

Background and Objectives: The effect of individualized hemodynamic management on the intraoperative use of fluids and other hemodynamic interventions in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate how the use of individualized hemodynamic management based on extended continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring modifies intraoperative hemodynamic interventions compared to conventional hemodynamic monitoring with intermittent non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Methods: Fifty adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III) who underwent spinal procedures in the prone position and were then managed with a restrictive fluid strategy were prospectively randomized into intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, individualized hemodynamic management followed a goal-directed protocol based on continuously non-invasively measured blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume variation. In the control group, patients were monitored using intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, and the choice of hemodynamic intervention was left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Results: In the intervention group, more hypotensive episodes (3 (2-4) vs. 1 (0-2), p = 0.0001), higher intraoperative dose of ephedrine (0 (0-10) vs. 0 (0-0) mg, p = 0.0008), and more positive fluid balance (680 (510-937) vs. 270 (196-377) ml, p < 0.0001) were recorded. Intraoperative norepinephrine dose and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Individualized hemodynamic management based on data from extended non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring significantly modified intraoperative hemodynamic management and was associated with a higher number of hemodynamic interventions and a more positive fluid balance.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22032621
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131151330.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/medicina58111683 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36422222
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Kukralova, Lucie $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000323479774
245    14
$a The Impact of Individualized Hemodynamic Management on Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Hemodynamic Interventions during Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Randomized Trial / $c L. Kukralova, V. Dostalova, M. Cihlo, J. Kraus, P. Dostal
520    9_
$a Background and Objectives: The effect of individualized hemodynamic management on the intraoperative use of fluids and other hemodynamic interventions in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate how the use of individualized hemodynamic management based on extended continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring modifies intraoperative hemodynamic interventions compared to conventional hemodynamic monitoring with intermittent non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Methods: Fifty adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III) who underwent spinal procedures in the prone position and were then managed with a restrictive fluid strategy were prospectively randomized into intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, individualized hemodynamic management followed a goal-directed protocol based on continuously non-invasively measured blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume variation. In the control group, patients were monitored using intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, and the choice of hemodynamic intervention was left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Results: In the intervention group, more hypotensive episodes (3 (2-4) vs. 1 (0-2), p = 0.0001), higher intraoperative dose of ephedrine (0 (0-10) vs. 0 (0-0) mg, p = 0.0008), and more positive fluid balance (680 (510-937) vs. 270 (196-377) ml, p &lt; 0.0001) were recorded. Intraoperative norepinephrine dose and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Individualized hemodynamic management based on data from extended non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring significantly modified intraoperative hemodynamic management and was associated with a higher number of hemodynamic interventions and a more positive fluid balance.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a pronační poloha $7 D016684
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a polohování pacienta $7 D056888
650    12
$a hemodynamika $7 D006439
650    _2
$a vodní a elektrolytová rovnováha $7 D014882
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dostalova, Vlasta $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cihlo, Miroslav $u Department of Neurosurgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kraus, Jaroslav $u Department of Ortopedic Surgery, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Sociální Péče 3316/12A, 401 13 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dostal, Pavel $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000196415160
773    0_
$w MED00180386 $t Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) $x 1648-9144 $g Roč. 58, č. 11 (2022)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36422222 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131151326 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891404 $s 1183956
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 58 $c 11 $e 20221120 $i 1648-9144 $m Medicina $n Medicina (Kaunas) $x MED00180386
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...