Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

A family carer decision support intervention for people with advanced dementia residing in a nursing home: a study protocol for an international advance care planning intervention (mySupport study)

AJE. Harding, J. Doherty, L. Bavelaar, C. Walshe, N. Preston, S. Kaasalainen, T. Sussman, JT. van der Steen, N. Cornally, I. Hartigan, M. Loucka, K. Vlckova, P. Di Giulio, S. Gonella, K. Brazil, mySupport Study Group

. 2022 ; 22 (1) : 822. [pub] 20221026

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22032981

BACKGROUND: Where it has been determined that a resident in a nursing home living with dementia loses decisional capacity, nursing home staff must deliver care that is in the person's best interests. Ideally, decisions should be made involving those close to the person, typically a family carer and health and social care providers. The aim of the Family Carer Decisional Support intervention is to inform family carers on end-of-life care options for a person living with advanced dementia and enable them to contribute to advance care planning. This implementation study proposes to; 1) adopt and apply the intervention internationally; and, 2) train nursing home staff to deliver the family carer decision support intervention. METHODS: This study will employ a multiple case study design to allow an understanding of the implementation process and to identify the factors which determine how well the intervention will work as intended. We will enrol nursing homes from each country (Canada n = 2 Republic of Ireland = 2, three regions in the UK n = 2 each, The Netherlands n = 2, Italy n = 2 and the Czech Republic n = 2) to reflect the range of characteristics in each national and local context. The RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework will guide the evaluation of implementation of the training and information resources. Our mixed methods study design has three phases to (1) establish knowledge about the context of implementation, (2) participant baseline information and measures and (3) follow up evaluation. DISCUSSION: The use of a multiple case study design will enable evaluation of the intervention in different national, regional, cultural, clinical, social and organisational contexts, and we anticipate collecting rich and in-depth data. While it is hoped that the intervention resources will impact on policy and practice in the nursing homes that are recruited to the study, the development of implementation guidelines will ensure impact on wider national policy and practice. It is our aim that the resources will be sustainable beyond the duration of the study and this will enable the resources to have a longstanding relevance for future advance care planning practice for staff, family carers and residents with advanced dementia.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22032981
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131150932.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12877-022-03533-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36289458
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Harding, Andrew J E $u Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
245    12
$a A family carer decision support intervention for people with advanced dementia residing in a nursing home: a study protocol for an international advance care planning intervention (mySupport study) / $c AJE. Harding, J. Doherty, L. Bavelaar, C. Walshe, N. Preston, S. Kaasalainen, T. Sussman, JT. van der Steen, N. Cornally, I. Hartigan, M. Loucka, K. Vlckova, P. Di Giulio, S. Gonella, K. Brazil, mySupport Study Group
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Where it has been determined that a resident in a nursing home living with dementia loses decisional capacity, nursing home staff must deliver care that is in the person's best interests. Ideally, decisions should be made involving those close to the person, typically a family carer and health and social care providers. The aim of the Family Carer Decisional Support intervention is to inform family carers on end-of-life care options for a person living with advanced dementia and enable them to contribute to advance care planning. This implementation study proposes to; 1) adopt and apply the intervention internationally; and, 2) train nursing home staff to deliver the family carer decision support intervention. METHODS: This study will employ a multiple case study design to allow an understanding of the implementation process and to identify the factors which determine how well the intervention will work as intended. We will enrol nursing homes from each country (Canada n = 2 Republic of Ireland = 2, three regions in the UK n = 2 each, The Netherlands n = 2, Italy n = 2 and the Czech Republic n = 2) to reflect the range of characteristics in each national and local context. The RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework will guide the evaluation of implementation of the training and information resources. Our mixed methods study design has three phases to (1) establish knowledge about the context of implementation, (2) participant baseline information and measures and (3) follow up evaluation. DISCUSSION: The use of a multiple case study design will enable evaluation of the intervention in different national, regional, cultural, clinical, social and organisational contexts, and we anticipate collecting rich and in-depth data. While it is hoped that the intervention resources will impact on policy and practice in the nursing homes that are recruited to the study, the development of implementation guidelines will ensure impact on wider national policy and practice. It is our aim that the resources will be sustainable beyond the duration of the study and this will enable the resources to have a longstanding relevance for future advance care planning practice for staff, family carers and residents with advanced dementia.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a osoby pečující o pacienty $7 D017028
650    12
$a demence $x terapie $7 D003704
650    _2
$a pečovatelské domovy $7 D009735
650    12
$a předběžné plánování péče $7 D032722
650    12
$a péče o umírající $x metody $7 D013727
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Doherty, Julie $u School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
700    1_
$a Bavelaar, Laura $u Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Walshe, Catherine $u Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
700    1_
$a Preston, Nancy $u Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
700    1_
$a Kaasalainen, Sharon $u School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
700    1_
$a Sussman, Tamara $u School of Social Work, McGill University, Hamilton, Canada
700    1_
$a van der Steen, Jenny T $u Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Cornally, Nicola $u School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland
700    1_
$a Hartigan, Irene $u School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland
700    1_
$a Loucka, Martin $u Centre for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vlckova, Karolina $u Centre for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Di Giulio, Paola $u Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Gonella, Silvia $u Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Brazil, Kevin $u School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK. k.brazil@qub.ac.uk $1 https://orcid.org/0000000176694991
710    2_
$a mySupport Study Group
773    0_
$w MED00008182 $t BMC geriatrics $x 1471-2318 $g Roč. 22, č. 1 (2022), s. 822
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36289458 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131150928 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891635 $s 1184316
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 22 $c 1 $d 822 $e 20221026 $i 1471-2318 $m BMC geriatrics $n BMC Geriatr $x MED00008182
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120
Back

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options