Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Prone positioning may increase lung overdistension in COVID-19-induced ARDS

M. Otáhal, M. Mlček, JB. Borges, GC. Alcala, D. Hladík, E. Kuriščák, L. Tejkl, M. Amato, O. Kittnar

. 2022 ; 12 (1) : 16528. [pub] 20221003

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22033131

Real-time effects of changing body position and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on regional lung overdistension and collapse in individual patients remain largely unknown and not timely monitored. The aim of this study was to individualize PEEP in supine and prone body positions seeking to reduce lung collapse and overdistension in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that prone positioning with bedside titrated PEEP would provide attenuation of both overdistension and collapse. In this prospective observational study, patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS under mechanical ventilation were included. We used electrical impedance tomography (EIT) with decremental PEEP titration algorithm (PEEPEIT-titration), which provides information on regional lung overdistension and collapse, along with global respiratory system compliance, to individualize PEEP and body position. PEEPEIT-titration in supine position followed by PEEPEIT-titration in prone position were performed. Immediately before each PEEPEIT-titration, the same lung recruitment maneuver was performed: 2 min of PEEP 24 cmH2O and driving pressure of 15 cmH2O. Forty-two PEEPEIT-titration were performed in ten patients (21 pairs supine and prone positions). We have found larger % of overdistension along the PEEP titration in prone than supine position (P = 0.042). A larger % of collapse along the PEEP titration was found in supine than prone position (P = 0.037). A smaller respiratory system compliance was found in prone than supine position (P < 0.0005). In patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS, prone body position, when compared with supine body position, decreased lung collapse at low PEEP levels, but increased lung overdistension at PEEP levels greater than 10 cm H2O.Trial registration number: NCT04460859.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22033131
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250424104748.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41598-022-20881-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36192569
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Otáhal, Michal $u Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Prone positioning may increase lung overdistension in COVID-19-induced ARDS / $c M. Otáhal, M. Mlček, JB. Borges, GC. Alcala, D. Hladík, E. Kuriščák, L. Tejkl, M. Amato, O. Kittnar
520    9_
$a Real-time effects of changing body position and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on regional lung overdistension and collapse in individual patients remain largely unknown and not timely monitored. The aim of this study was to individualize PEEP in supine and prone body positions seeking to reduce lung collapse and overdistension in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that prone positioning with bedside titrated PEEP would provide attenuation of both overdistension and collapse. In this prospective observational study, patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS under mechanical ventilation were included. We used electrical impedance tomography (EIT) with decremental PEEP titration algorithm (PEEPEIT-titration), which provides information on regional lung overdistension and collapse, along with global respiratory system compliance, to individualize PEEP and body position. PEEPEIT-titration in supine position followed by PEEPEIT-titration in prone position were performed. Immediately before each PEEPEIT-titration, the same lung recruitment maneuver was performed: 2 min of PEEP 24 cmH2O and driving pressure of 15 cmH2O. Forty-two PEEPEIT-titration were performed in ten patients (21 pairs supine and prone positions). We have found larger % of overdistension along the PEEP titration in prone than supine position (P = 0.042). A larger % of collapse along the PEEP titration was found in supine than prone position (P = 0.037). A smaller respiratory system compliance was found in prone than supine position (P < 0.0005). In patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS, prone body position, when compared with supine body position, decreased lung collapse at low PEEP levels, but increased lung overdistension at PEEP levels greater than 10 cm H2O.Trial registration number: NCT04460859.
650    12
$a COVID-19 $x komplikace $x terapie $7 D000086382
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a plíce $x patologie $7 D008168
650    12
$a ventilace umělá s výdechovým přetlakem $7 D011175
650    _2
$a pronační poloha $7 D016684
650    12
$a atelektáza $7 D001261
650    12
$a syndrom dechové tísně $x etiologie $x terapie $7 D012128
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Mlček, Mikuláš $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Borges, Joao Batista $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic. joaobatistaborges8@gmail.com $7 xx0331468
700    1_
$a Alcala, Glasiele Cristina $u Pulmonology Division, Cardiopulmonary Department, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
700    1_
$a Hladík, Dominik $u Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kuriščák, Eduard $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tejkl, Leoš $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Amato, Marcelo $u Pulmonology Division, Cardiopulmonary Department, Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
700    1_
$a Kittnar, Otomar $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 12, č. 1 (2022), s. 16528
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36192569 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250424104747 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891724 $s 1184466
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 12 $c 1 $d 16528 $e 20221003 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...