• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Unilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and a unilateral metastatic sentinel lymph node is safe

WL. Van der Kolk, AGJ. Van der Zee, BM. Slomovitz, PJW. Baldwin, HC. Van Doorn, JA. De Hullu, J. Van der Velden, KN. Gaarenstroom, BFM. Slangen, P. Kjolhede, M. Brännström, I. Vergote, CM. Holland, R. Coleman, EBL. Van Dorst, WJ. Van Driel, D....

. 2022 ; 167 (1) : 3-10. [pub] 20220907

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22033165

OBJECTIVE: Optimal management of the contralateral groin in patients with early-stage vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) and a metastatic unilateral inguinal sentinel lymph node (SN) is unclear. We analyzed patients who participated in GROINSS-V I or II to determine whether treatment of the contralateral groin can safely be omitted in patients with a unilateral metastatic SN. METHODS: We selected the patients with a unilateral metastatic SN from the GROINSS-V I and II databases. We determined the incidence of contralateral additional non-SN metastases in patients with unilateral SN-metastasis who underwent bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL). In those who underwent only ipsilateral groin treatment or no further treatment, we determined the incidence of contralateral groin recurrences during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 1912 patients with early-stage VSCC, 366 had a unilateral metastatic SN. Subsequently, 244 had an IFL or no treatment of the contralateral groin. In seven patients (7/244; 2.9% [95% CI: 1.4%-5.8%]) disease was diagnosed in the contralateral groin: five had contralateral non-SN metastasis at IFL and two developed an isolated contralateral groin recurrence after no further treatment. Five of them had a primary tumor ≥30 mm. Bilateral radiotherapy was administered in 122 patients, of whom one (1/122; 0.8% [95% CI: 0.1%-4.5%]) had a contralateral groin recurrence. CONCLUSION: The risk of contralateral lymph node metastases in patients with early-stage VSCC and a unilateral metastatic SN is low. It appears safe to limit groin treatment to unilateral IFL or inguinofemoral radiotherapy in these cases.

1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge United Kingdom

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven the Netherlands

Center of Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam the Netherlands

CHUM Université de Montréal Montréal Quebec Canada

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology European Cancer Institute Milan Italy

Erasmus MC Cancer Institute University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam the Netherlands

European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening Institute University Innsbruck Austria

Jena University Hospital Friedrich Schiller University Jena Germany

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust St James' University Hospital Leeds United Kingdom

Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands

Leuven Cancer Institute Leuven Belgium

Linköping University Linköping Sweden

Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht the Netherlands

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust St Marys Hospital Manchester United Kingdom

Medical University Graz Graz Austria

Mount Sinai Medical Center Miami Beach FL United States of America

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Nottingham United Kingdom

Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands

Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Göteborg Sweden

St Josephs Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix AZ United States of America

Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City OK United States of America

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX United States of America

University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands

University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands

University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island Providence RI United States of America

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22033165
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230131150646.0
007      
ta
008      
230120s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.017 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36085090
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Van der Kolk, W L $u University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
245    10
$a Unilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and a unilateral metastatic sentinel lymph node is safe / $c WL. Van der Kolk, AGJ. Van der Zee, BM. Slomovitz, PJW. Baldwin, HC. Van Doorn, JA. De Hullu, J. Van der Velden, KN. Gaarenstroom, BFM. Slangen, P. Kjolhede, M. Brännström, I. Vergote, CM. Holland, R. Coleman, EBL. Van Dorst, WJ. Van Driel, D. Nunns, M. Widschwendter, D. Nugent, PA. DiSilvestro, RS. Mannel, MY. Tjiong, D. Boll, D. Cibula, A. Covens, D. Provencher, IB. Runnebaum, BJ. Monk, V. Zanagnolo, K. Tamussino, MHM. Oonk, all GROINSS-V I and II participants
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Optimal management of the contralateral groin in patients with early-stage vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) and a metastatic unilateral inguinal sentinel lymph node (SN) is unclear. We analyzed patients who participated in GROINSS-V I or II to determine whether treatment of the contralateral groin can safely be omitted in patients with a unilateral metastatic SN. METHODS: We selected the patients with a unilateral metastatic SN from the GROINSS-V I and II databases. We determined the incidence of contralateral additional non-SN metastases in patients with unilateral SN-metastasis who underwent bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL). In those who underwent only ipsilateral groin treatment or no further treatment, we determined the incidence of contralateral groin recurrences during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 1912 patients with early-stage VSCC, 366 had a unilateral metastatic SN. Subsequently, 244 had an IFL or no treatment of the contralateral groin. In seven patients (7/244; 2.9% [95% CI: 1.4%-5.8%]) disease was diagnosed in the contralateral groin: five had contralateral non-SN metastasis at IFL and two developed an isolated contralateral groin recurrence after no further treatment. Five of them had a primary tumor ≥30 mm. Bilateral radiotherapy was administered in 122 patients, of whom one (1/122; 0.8% [95% CI: 0.1%-4.5%]) had a contralateral groin recurrence. CONCLUSION: The risk of contralateral lymph node metastases in patients with early-stage VSCC and a unilateral metastatic SN is low. It appears safe to limit groin treatment to unilateral IFL or inguinofemoral radiotherapy in these cases.
650    12
$a spinocelulární karcinom $x patologie $7 D002294
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a třísla $7 D006119
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lymfadenektomie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D008197
650    _2
$a lymfatické uzliny $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D008198
650    12
$a lymfadenopatie $x patologie $7 D000072281
650    _2
$a lymfatické metastázy $x patologie $7 D008207
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x patologie $7 D009364
650    12
$a sentinelová uzlina $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D000071036
650    _2
$a biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny $7 D021701
650    12
$a nádory vulvy $x patologie $7 D014846
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Van der Zee, A G J $u University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Slomovitz, B M $u Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, United States of America
700    1_
$a Baldwin, P J W $u Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Van Doorn, H C $u Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a De Hullu, J A $u Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Van der Velden, J $u Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Gaarenstroom, K N $u Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Slangen, B F M $u Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Kjolhede, P $u Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
700    1_
$a Brännström, M $u Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
700    1_
$a Vergote, I $u Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Holland, C M $u Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust-St Marys Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Coleman, R $u The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
700    1_
$a Van Dorst, E B L $u University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Van Driel, W J $u Center of Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Nunns, D $u Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Widschwendter, M $u European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, University Innsbruck, Austria
700    1_
$a Nugent, D $u Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a DiSilvestro, P A $u Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, United States of America
700    1_
$a Mannel, R S $u Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America
700    1_
$a Tjiong, M Y $u Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Boll, D $u Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Cibula, D $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Covens, A $u University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
700    1_
$a Provencher, D $u CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
700    1_
$a Runnebaum, I B $u Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
700    1_
$a Monk, B J $u St Josephs Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America
700    1_
$a Zanagnolo, V $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, European Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Tamussino, K $u Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
700    1_
$a Oonk, M H M $u University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: m.h.m.oonk@umcg.nl
710    2_
$a all GROINSS-V I and II participants
773    0_
$w MED00001958 $t Gynecologic oncology $x 1095-6859 $g Roč. 167, č. 1 (2022), s. 3-10
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36085090 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230120 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230131150642 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1891747 $s 1184500
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 167 $c 1 $d 3-10 $e 20220907 $i 1095-6859 $m Gynecologic oncology $n Gynecol Oncol $x MED00001958
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230120

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...