-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Is there a Need to Change the Basic Principles of Histology? Educational, Functional and Embryological Perspective
I. Varga, D. Kachlík, M. Csöbönyeiová, C. Feitscherová, M. Klein
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 1991
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
PubMed Central
od 2020
ProQuest Central
od 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2006-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1998
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Although it is not an easy task to classify cells into different types, or in turn cell types into tissue types, a clear, understandable, didactically and clinically relevant tissue classification is indispensable for undergraduate medical education, expert discussions in biomedical research as well as for clinical practice. From the earliest discovery of the light microscope on, tissue classification has been a dynamic process. Historically, it was not a rare occurrence that different textbooks offered different tissue classifications. Nowadays, classifications have almost become uniform - the most common is the histological classification into four basic tissue types (epithelial, connective, muscle, nervous), which is recognized by the majority of modern histology and pathology textbooks. The reason is that, with some exceptions, this classification seems to be the most relevant not only for educational purposes but also from an embryological perspective and clinical-histopathological practice. Recently, attempts have been made to abandon this established classification and replace it with a new one. Any new classification, which would improve the presently used is welcomed. However, if the proposed innovation does not satisfy the needs of modern education and clinical practice, it should be handled with great caution or reconsidered.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22034003
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250819103858.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230207s2022 xr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.33549/physiolres.934956 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36592436
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Varga, Ivan, $u Institute of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic. ivan.varga@fmed.uniba.sk $d 1981- $7 xx0211518
- 245 10
- $a Is there a Need to Change the Basic Principles of Histology? Educational, Functional and Embryological Perspective / $c I. Varga, D. Kachlík, M. Csöbönyeiová, C. Feitscherová, M. Klein
- 520 9_
- $a Although it is not an easy task to classify cells into different types, or in turn cell types into tissue types, a clear, understandable, didactically and clinically relevant tissue classification is indispensable for undergraduate medical education, expert discussions in biomedical research as well as for clinical practice. From the earliest discovery of the light microscope on, tissue classification has been a dynamic process. Historically, it was not a rare occurrence that different textbooks offered different tissue classifications. Nowadays, classifications have almost become uniform - the most common is the histological classification into four basic tissue types (epithelial, connective, muscle, nervous), which is recognized by the majority of modern histology and pathology textbooks. The reason is that, with some exceptions, this classification seems to be the most relevant not only for educational purposes but also from an embryological perspective and clinical-histopathological practice. Recently, attempts have been made to abandon this established classification and replace it with a new one. Any new classification, which would improve the presently used is welcomed. However, if the proposed innovation does not satisfy the needs of modern education and clinical practice, it should be handled with great caution or reconsidered.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kachlík, David, $d 1974- $7 pna2008482481 $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Csöbönyeiová, Mária, $d 1985- $7 xx0283071 $u Institute of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Feitscherová, Claudia, $d 1997 $7 xx0283082 $u Institute of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Klein, Martin, $u Institute of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic $d 1988- $7 xx0283077
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003824 $t Physiological research $x 1802-9973 $g Roč. 71, Suppl 1 (2022), s. S3-S10
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36592436 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 4120 $c 266 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230207 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250819103841 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1894811 $s 1185392
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 71 $c Suppl 1 $d S3-S10 $e 2022Dec27 $i 1802-9973 $m Physiological research $n Physiol. Res. (Print) $x MED00003824
- LZP __
- $b NLK116 $a Pubmed-20230207