-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Vitamin D3 Supplementation: Comparison of 1000 IU and 2000 IU Dose in Healthy Individuals
E. Dědečková, R. Viták, M. Jirásko, M. Králová, O. Topolčan, L. Pecen, T. Fürst, P. Brož, R. Kučera
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
PubMed
36983963
DOI
10.3390/life13030808
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Scientific studies point to a significant global vitamin D deficiency. The recommended dose of vitamin D for the adult population in Central Europe is 800-2000 IU/day. The aim of our study was to determine whether doses of 1000 IU or 2000 IU of vitamin D3 are adequate to achieve the sufficiency reference values of [25(OH)D]. METHODS: Seventy-two healthy volunteers, average age twenty-two, took part in the study. The study was conducted from October to March in order to eliminate intra-dermal vitamin D production. Vitamin D3 in an oleaginous mixture was used. The participants used either 1000 IU or 2000 IU/daily for two 60-day periods with a 30-day break. RESULTS: The dose of 1000 IU, taken for 60 days, increased vitamin D levels relatively little. Furthermore, serum vitamin D levels decreased in the 30 days following the cessation of supplementation. Taking 2000 IU daily led to a sharp increase in serum levels which plateaued 30 days after the subjects stopped using vitamin D3 drops. CONCLUSIONS: Both doses, taken daily, can help maintain adequate vitamin D levels during the winter months. A daily dose of 2000 IU, however, maintained the desired levels of vitamin D for a longer period.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23002676
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240903145223.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230413s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/life13030808 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36983963
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Dědečková, Eva $u Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Vitamin D3 Supplementation: Comparison of 1000 IU and 2000 IU Dose in Healthy Individuals / $c E. Dědečková, R. Viták, M. Jirásko, M. Králová, O. Topolčan, L. Pecen, T. Fürst, P. Brož, R. Kučera
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Scientific studies point to a significant global vitamin D deficiency. The recommended dose of vitamin D for the adult population in Central Europe is 800-2000 IU/day. The aim of our study was to determine whether doses of 1000 IU or 2000 IU of vitamin D3 are adequate to achieve the sufficiency reference values of [25(OH)D]. METHODS: Seventy-two healthy volunteers, average age twenty-two, took part in the study. The study was conducted from October to March in order to eliminate intra-dermal vitamin D production. Vitamin D3 in an oleaginous mixture was used. The participants used either 1000 IU or 2000 IU/daily for two 60-day periods with a 30-day break. RESULTS: The dose of 1000 IU, taken for 60 days, increased vitamin D levels relatively little. Furthermore, serum vitamin D levels decreased in the 30 days following the cessation of supplementation. Taking 2000 IU daily led to a sharp increase in serum levels which plateaued 30 days after the subjects stopped using vitamin D3 drops. CONCLUSIONS: Both doses, taken daily, can help maintain adequate vitamin D levels during the winter months. A daily dose of 2000 IU, however, maintained the desired levels of vitamin D for a longer period.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Viták, Roman $u Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000928952541
- 700 1_
- $a Jirásko, Michal $u Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000248747723
- 700 1_
- $a Králová, Markéta $u Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Topolčan, Ondřej $u Department of Immunochemistry, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pecen, Ladislav $u Department of Immunochemistry, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fürst, Tomáš $u Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Brož, Pavel $u Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Hematology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic $7 xx0129416
- 700 1_
- $a Kučera, Radek $u Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Immunochemistry, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000227392302 $7 jo2016919265
- 773 0_
- $w MED00186366 $t Life $x 2075-1729 $g Roč. 13, č. 3 (2023)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36983963 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240903145220 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1922627 $s 1188883
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 13 $c 3 $e 20230316 $i 2075-1729 $m Life $n Life (Basel) $x MED00186366
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230413