-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Intraprostatic Relapse after Definitive Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Patterns of Failure and Association between Volume of Irradiation and Late Toxicity
M. Miszczyk, M. Kraszkiewicz, M. Moll, K. Kaminiów, S. Sobel, Ł. Dolla, P. Wojcieszek, P. Rajwa, T. Yanagisawa, Z. Nowicka, SF. Shariat, G. Goldner, L. Miszczyk, W. Majewski
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2009
PubMed Central
od 2009
Europe PubMed Central
od 2009
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2009
PubMed
36831523
DOI
10.3390/cancers15041180
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the adverse effects and outcomes of salvage re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (sSBRT) for local recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive radiotherapy (RT). The study was focused on the adverse effects and prognostic factors for treatment toxicity, followed by an analysis of patterns of failure and survival. Patients treated with sSBRT between 2012 and 2020 at a tertiary institution were included. The exclusion criteria were a primary or salvage radical prostatectomy or a palliative sSBRT dose. Patients with oligorecurrence were eligible if all metastatic lesions were treated locally with curative intent. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to grade ≥ 3 toxicity, local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (FFDM), progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical control (BC) and overall survival (OS). The differences between groups (focal vs. whole-gland sSBRT) were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess prognostic factors for the listed endpoints. A total of 56 patients with a median age of 70.9 years and a median follow-up of 38.6 months were included in the analysis. The majority of them received local sSBRT only (45; 80.4%), while the rest were simultaneously treated for oligometastases (11; 19.6%). Overall, 18 (32.1%) patients experienced any grade ≥ 3 toxicity, including 1 (6.7%) patient who received focal sSBRT, and 17 (41.5%) patients treated with whole-gland sSBRT. The Planning Target Volume (per cc; HR 1.01; 95% CI 1-1.02; p = 0.025) and use of ADT (yes vs. no; HR 0.35; 95%CI 0.13-0.93; p = 0.035) were independent prognostic factors for the risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicity. The estimated rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was significantly higher (43.8% vs. 7.1% at 2 years; p = 0.006), and there was no improvement in the LC (92.9% vs. 85.3% at 2 years; p = 0.759) in patients treated with whole-gland sSBRT compared to focal sSBRT. The 2- and 5-year LC were 87.6% and 47.9%, respectively; the 2- and 5-year FFDM were 72.7% and 42.8%, respectively; and the 2- and 5-year PFS were 67.9% and 28.7%, respectively. The primary pattern of failure was distant metastasis. The sSBRT for local recurrence of PCa after definitive RT was associated with a high risk of severe grade ≥ 3 toxicity, which significantly increased with the volume and extent of re-irradiation.
Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine Medical University of Łódź 90 419 Łódź Poland
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University 12108 Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna 1090 Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia 40 752 Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo 105 8461 Japan
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX 75230 USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY 10065 USA
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman 19328 Jordan
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University 119435 Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology 1090 Vienna Austria
Radiotherapy Department Centre Antoine Lacassagne 33 Avenue Valombrose CEDEX2 06189 Nice France
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23002942
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230421095923.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230413s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/cancers15041180 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36831523
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Miszczyk, Marcin $u IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000243750827
- 245 10
- $a Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Intraprostatic Relapse after Definitive Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Patterns of Failure and Association between Volume of Irradiation and Late Toxicity / $c M. Miszczyk, M. Kraszkiewicz, M. Moll, K. Kaminiów, S. Sobel, Ł. Dolla, P. Wojcieszek, P. Rajwa, T. Yanagisawa, Z. Nowicka, SF. Shariat, G. Goldner, L. Miszczyk, W. Majewski
- 520 9_
- $a The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the adverse effects and outcomes of salvage re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (sSBRT) for local recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive radiotherapy (RT). The study was focused on the adverse effects and prognostic factors for treatment toxicity, followed by an analysis of patterns of failure and survival. Patients treated with sSBRT between 2012 and 2020 at a tertiary institution were included. The exclusion criteria were a primary or salvage radical prostatectomy or a palliative sSBRT dose. Patients with oligorecurrence were eligible if all metastatic lesions were treated locally with curative intent. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to grade ≥ 3 toxicity, local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (FFDM), progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical control (BC) and overall survival (OS). The differences between groups (focal vs. whole-gland sSBRT) were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess prognostic factors for the listed endpoints. A total of 56 patients with a median age of 70.9 years and a median follow-up of 38.6 months were included in the analysis. The majority of them received local sSBRT only (45; 80.4%), while the rest were simultaneously treated for oligometastases (11; 19.6%). Overall, 18 (32.1%) patients experienced any grade ≥ 3 toxicity, including 1 (6.7%) patient who received focal sSBRT, and 17 (41.5%) patients treated with whole-gland sSBRT. The Planning Target Volume (per cc; HR 1.01; 95% CI 1-1.02; p = 0.025) and use of ADT (yes vs. no; HR 0.35; 95%CI 0.13-0.93; p = 0.035) were independent prognostic factors for the risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicity. The estimated rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was significantly higher (43.8% vs. 7.1% at 2 years; p = 0.006), and there was no improvement in the LC (92.9% vs. 85.3% at 2 years; p = 0.759) in patients treated with whole-gland sSBRT compared to focal sSBRT. The 2- and 5-year LC were 87.6% and 47.9%, respectively; the 2- and 5-year FFDM were 72.7% and 42.8%, respectively; and the 2- and 5-year PFS were 67.9% and 28.7%, respectively. The primary pattern of failure was distant metastasis. The sSBRT for local recurrence of PCa after definitive RT was associated with a high risk of severe grade ≥ 3 toxicity, which significantly increased with the volume and extent of re-irradiation.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kraszkiewicz, Małgorzata $u Radiotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland $u Radiotherapy Department, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, Avenue Valombrose, CEDEX2, 06189 Nice, France
- 700 1_
- $a Moll, Matthias $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Kaminiów, Konrad $u IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000274812621
- 700 1_
- $a Sobel, Szymon $u IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Dolla, Łukasz $u Radiotherapy Planning Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Wojcieszek, Piotr $u Brachytherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Rajwa, Paweł $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Zabrze, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Yanagisawa, Takafumi $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000274100712
- 700 1_
- $a Nowicka, Zuzanna $u Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Łódź, 90-419 Łódź, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia $u Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75230, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 12108 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Goldner, Gregor $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Miszczyk, Leszek $u Radiotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Majewski, Wojciech $u Radiotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
- 773 0_
- $w MED00173178 $t Cancers $x 2072-6694 $g Roč. 15, č. 4 (2023)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36831523 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230421095916 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1922718 $s 1189149
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 15 $c 4 $e 20230213 $i 2072-6694 $m Cancers $n Cancers $x MED00173178
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230413