Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Allometric normalization of handgrip strength in older adults: Which body size parameter is the most appropriate

M. Kasović, P. Sagat, Z. Kalčik, L. Štefan, A. Hubinák, P. Krška

. 2023 ; 15 (1) : 18. [pub] 20230208

Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Although absolute handgrip strength has been associated with health-related outcomes in older adults, little evidence has been provided regarding its adjustment by a variety of body size dimensions. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to establish the most appropriate normalization of handgrip strength by different body size parameters in a large sample of noninstitutionalized older adults. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 643 men and women aged > 60, who were part of the rehabilitation center facility program. Handgrip strength was objectively measured using a Jamar Plus* + Digital Hand Dynamometer. Body size parameters included body weight and height, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, fat mass and fat-free mass. The most appropriate parameter associated with handgrip strength was identified using allometry. RESULTS: Findings showed that the most appropriate body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization was height (allometric exponent: 0.85), compared to fat-free mass (0.26) and body mass (0.12). Other body size variables were not significantly associated with handgrip strength and were omitted from further analyses. The correlations between normalized handgrip strength were significant when handgrip strength was normalized by body mass and fat-free mass, while no significant correlations were found, when handgrip strength was normalized by body height. CONCLUSION: Based on the study results, body height seems to be the best body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization in older adults, omitting the influence of body size on strength performance. If handgrip strength is measured, body height may help normalize strength for large-scale research.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23002974
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230421100147.0
007      
ta
008      
230413s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13102-023-00628-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36755305
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Kasović, Mario $u Department of General and Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Horvaćanski zavoj 15, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia $u Department of Physical Activities and Health Sciences, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Allometric normalization of handgrip strength in older adults: Which body size parameter is the most appropriate / $c M. Kasović, P. Sagat, Z. Kalčik, L. Štefan, A. Hubinák, P. Krška
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Although absolute handgrip strength has been associated with health-related outcomes in older adults, little evidence has been provided regarding its adjustment by a variety of body size dimensions. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to establish the most appropriate normalization of handgrip strength by different body size parameters in a large sample of noninstitutionalized older adults. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 643 men and women aged > 60, who were part of the rehabilitation center facility program. Handgrip strength was objectively measured using a Jamar Plus* + Digital Hand Dynamometer. Body size parameters included body weight and height, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, fat mass and fat-free mass. The most appropriate parameter associated with handgrip strength was identified using allometry. RESULTS: Findings showed that the most appropriate body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization was height (allometric exponent: 0.85), compared to fat-free mass (0.26) and body mass (0.12). Other body size variables were not significantly associated with handgrip strength and were omitted from further analyses. The correlations between normalized handgrip strength were significant when handgrip strength was normalized by body mass and fat-free mass, while no significant correlations were found, when handgrip strength was normalized by body height. CONCLUSION: Based on the study results, body height seems to be the best body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization in older adults, omitting the influence of body size on strength performance. If handgrip strength is measured, body height may help normalize strength for large-scale research.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sagat, Peter $u Albert Einstein, Bc., Prince Sultan University, Sport Sciences and Diagnostics Research Group, GSD-HPE Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
700    1_
$a Kalčik, Zvonimir $u The Home of War Veterans, Zagreb, Croatia
700    1_
$a Štefan, Lovro $u Department of General and Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Horvaćanski zavoj 15, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia. lovro.stefan1510@gmail.com $u Department of Physical Activities and Health Sciences, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. lovro.stefan1510@gmail.com $u Recruitment and Examination (RECETOX), Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. lovro.stefan1510@gmail.com
700    1_
$a Hubinák, Andrej $u Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Ružomberok, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Krška, Peter $u Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Ružomberok, Slovakia
773    0_
$w MED00208616 $t BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation $x 2052-1847 $g Roč. 15, č. 1 (2023), s. 18
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36755305 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230421100139 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1922730 $s 1189181
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 15 $c 1 $d 18 $e 20230208 $i 2052-1847 $m BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation $n BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil $x MED00208616
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230413

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...