-
Something wrong with this record ?
Allometric normalization of handgrip strength in older adults: Which body size parameter is the most appropriate
M. Kasović, P. Sagat, Z. Kalčik, L. Štefan, A. Hubinák, P. Krška
Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2009-01-12
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2009
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2013
Free Medical Journals
from 2013
PubMed Central
from 2013
Europe PubMed Central
from 2013
ProQuest Central
from 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
Health Management Database (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2013
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2009-12-01
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Although absolute handgrip strength has been associated with health-related outcomes in older adults, little evidence has been provided regarding its adjustment by a variety of body size dimensions. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to establish the most appropriate normalization of handgrip strength by different body size parameters in a large sample of noninstitutionalized older adults. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 643 men and women aged > 60, who were part of the rehabilitation center facility program. Handgrip strength was objectively measured using a Jamar Plus* + Digital Hand Dynamometer. Body size parameters included body weight and height, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, fat mass and fat-free mass. The most appropriate parameter associated with handgrip strength was identified using allometry. RESULTS: Findings showed that the most appropriate body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization was height (allometric exponent: 0.85), compared to fat-free mass (0.26) and body mass (0.12). Other body size variables were not significantly associated with handgrip strength and were omitted from further analyses. The correlations between normalized handgrip strength were significant when handgrip strength was normalized by body mass and fat-free mass, while no significant correlations were found, when handgrip strength was normalized by body height. CONCLUSION: Based on the study results, body height seems to be the best body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization in older adults, omitting the influence of body size on strength performance. If handgrip strength is measured, body height may help normalize strength for large-scale research.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23002974
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230421100147.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230413s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s13102-023-00628-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36755305
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kasović, Mario $u Department of General and Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Horvaćanski zavoj 15, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia $u Department of Physical Activities and Health Sciences, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Allometric normalization of handgrip strength in older adults: Which body size parameter is the most appropriate / $c M. Kasović, P. Sagat, Z. Kalčik, L. Štefan, A. Hubinák, P. Krška
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Although absolute handgrip strength has been associated with health-related outcomes in older adults, little evidence has been provided regarding its adjustment by a variety of body size dimensions. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to establish the most appropriate normalization of handgrip strength by different body size parameters in a large sample of noninstitutionalized older adults. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 643 men and women aged > 60, who were part of the rehabilitation center facility program. Handgrip strength was objectively measured using a Jamar Plus* + Digital Hand Dynamometer. Body size parameters included body weight and height, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, fat mass and fat-free mass. The most appropriate parameter associated with handgrip strength was identified using allometry. RESULTS: Findings showed that the most appropriate body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization was height (allometric exponent: 0.85), compared to fat-free mass (0.26) and body mass (0.12). Other body size variables were not significantly associated with handgrip strength and were omitted from further analyses. The correlations between normalized handgrip strength were significant when handgrip strength was normalized by body mass and fat-free mass, while no significant correlations were found, when handgrip strength was normalized by body height. CONCLUSION: Based on the study results, body height seems to be the best body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization in older adults, omitting the influence of body size on strength performance. If handgrip strength is measured, body height may help normalize strength for large-scale research.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Sagat, Peter $u Albert Einstein, Bc., Prince Sultan University, Sport Sciences and Diagnostics Research Group, GSD-HPE Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 700 1_
- $a Kalčik, Zvonimir $u The Home of War Veterans, Zagreb, Croatia
- 700 1_
- $a Štefan, Lovro $u Department of General and Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Horvaćanski zavoj 15, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia. lovro.stefan1510@gmail.com $u Department of Physical Activities and Health Sciences, Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. lovro.stefan1510@gmail.com $u Recruitment and Examination (RECETOX), Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. lovro.stefan1510@gmail.com
- 700 1_
- $a Hubinák, Andrej $u Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Ružomberok, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Krška, Peter $u Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Ružomberok, Slovakia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00208616 $t BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation $x 2052-1847 $g Roč. 15, č. 1 (2023), s. 18
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36755305 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230421100139 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1922730 $s 1189181
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 15 $c 1 $d 18 $e 20230208 $i 2052-1847 $m BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation $n BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil $x MED00208616
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230413