-
Something wrong with this record ?
Novel approach to decision making for orphan drugs
B. Decker, T. Mlcoch, A. Pustovalova, T. Dolezal
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
PubMed Central
from 2023
ProQuest Central
from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health Management Database (ProQuest)
from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2001-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Technology Assessment, Biomedical MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Decision Making MeSH
- Insurance, Health, Reimbursement MeSH
- Orphan Drug Production * MeSH
- Rare Diseases * drug therapy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
BACKGROUND: Out of 185 orphan medicinal products (OMPs) registered in 2015-2021, a mere 110 (59 percent) were available to Czech patients, and only 54 (29 percent) were officially reimbursed. Moreover, this proportion has steadily decreased over time. After years of public debate induced by this unsatisfactory OMP patient access, the national viewpoint shifted toward creating a special pathway for the reimbursement of OMP. Thus, a rigorous pricing and reimbursement procedure with strict timelines and elaborated methodology has been recently adopted in Czechia. METHODOLOGY: The innovative legislation follows the recommendations for value assessment and funding processes for rare diseases and incorporates additional elements of value, such as the societal perspective. First, the application with clinical evidence, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact analyses is submitted to the governmental health technology assessment (HTA) agency by the Marketing Authorization Holder or a Health Insurance Fund. Moreover, professional associations and patients' organizations are rightful participants in the proceeding, providing evidence and comments. Then, the HTA agency performs the assessment/appraisal of the evidence. It subsequently publishes the assessment report summarizing available information. The report is then forwarded to the Ministry of Health and its advisory body consisting of patients, clinical experts, health insurance funds, and the State. They critically evaluate the documents and issue a binding opinion following prespecified decision-making criteria. Based on this binding opinion, the decision is issued by the HTA agency. Thus, the role of the advisory body in this process is crucial. CONCLUSION: We believe that this novel approach may offer satisfactory patient access to orphan drugs. Moreover, it serves as a real-world example of "value-based" decision making.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23004232
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240410140050.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1017/S0266462323000053 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36748356
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Decker, Barbora $u Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000332050662 $7 xx0316085
- 245 10
- $a Novel approach to decision making for orphan drugs / $c B. Decker, T. Mlcoch, A. Pustovalova, T. Dolezal
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Out of 185 orphan medicinal products (OMPs) registered in 2015-2021, a mere 110 (59 percent) were available to Czech patients, and only 54 (29 percent) were officially reimbursed. Moreover, this proportion has steadily decreased over time. After years of public debate induced by this unsatisfactory OMP patient access, the national viewpoint shifted toward creating a special pathway for the reimbursement of OMP. Thus, a rigorous pricing and reimbursement procedure with strict timelines and elaborated methodology has been recently adopted in Czechia. METHODOLOGY: The innovative legislation follows the recommendations for value assessment and funding processes for rare diseases and incorporates additional elements of value, such as the societal perspective. First, the application with clinical evidence, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact analyses is submitted to the governmental health technology assessment (HTA) agency by the Marketing Authorization Holder or a Health Insurance Fund. Moreover, professional associations and patients' organizations are rightful participants in the proceeding, providing evidence and comments. Then, the HTA agency performs the assessment/appraisal of the evidence. It subsequently publishes the assessment report summarizing available information. The report is then forwarded to the Ministry of Health and its advisory body consisting of patients, clinical experts, health insurance funds, and the State. They critically evaluate the documents and issue a binding opinion following prespecified decision-making criteria. Based on this binding opinion, the decision is issued by the HTA agency. Thus, the role of the advisory body in this process is crucial. CONCLUSION: We believe that this novel approach may offer satisfactory patient access to orphan drugs. Moreover, it serves as a real-world example of "value-based" decision making.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a výroba orphan drugs $7 D009965
- 650 12
- $a vzácné nemoci $x farmakoterapie $7 D035583
- 650 _2
- $a úhrada zdravotního pojištění $7 D007349
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení biomedicínských technologií $7 D013673
- 650 _2
- $a rozhodování $7 D003657
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Mlcoch, Tomas $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Pustovalova, Anastasie $u Cogvio, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Dolezal, Tomas $u Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czechia $u Cogvio, Prague, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002378 $t International journal of technology assessment in health care $x 1471-6348 $g Roč. 39, č. 1 (2023), s. e10
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36748356 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240410140045 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1924728 $s 1190441
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 39 $c 1 $d e10 $e 20230207 $i 1471-6348 $m International journal of technology assessment in health care $n Int J Technol Assess Health Care $x MED00002378
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418