Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Novel approach to decision making for orphan drugs

B. Decker, T. Mlcoch, A. Pustovalova, T. Dolezal

. 2023 ; 39 (1) : e10. [pub] 20230207

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23004232
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK PubMed Central od 2023
ProQuest Central od 2001-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2001-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2001-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health Management Database (ProQuest) od 2001-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2001-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: Out of 185 orphan medicinal products (OMPs) registered in 2015-2021, a mere 110 (59 percent) were available to Czech patients, and only 54 (29 percent) were officially reimbursed. Moreover, this proportion has steadily decreased over time. After years of public debate induced by this unsatisfactory OMP patient access, the national viewpoint shifted toward creating a special pathway for the reimbursement of OMP. Thus, a rigorous pricing and reimbursement procedure with strict timelines and elaborated methodology has been recently adopted in Czechia. METHODOLOGY: The innovative legislation follows the recommendations for value assessment and funding processes for rare diseases and incorporates additional elements of value, such as the societal perspective. First, the application with clinical evidence, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact analyses is submitted to the governmental health technology assessment (HTA) agency by the Marketing Authorization Holder or a Health Insurance Fund. Moreover, professional associations and patients' organizations are rightful participants in the proceeding, providing evidence and comments. Then, the HTA agency performs the assessment/appraisal of the evidence. It subsequently publishes the assessment report summarizing available information. The report is then forwarded to the Ministry of Health and its advisory body consisting of patients, clinical experts, health insurance funds, and the State. They critically evaluate the documents and issue a binding opinion following prespecified decision-making criteria. Based on this binding opinion, the decision is issued by the HTA agency. Thus, the role of the advisory body in this process is crucial. CONCLUSION: We believe that this novel approach may offer satisfactory patient access to orphan drugs. Moreover, it serves as a real-world example of "value-based" decision making.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23004232
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240410140050.0
007      
ta
008      
230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1017/S0266462323000053 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36748356
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Decker, Barbora $u Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000332050662 $7 xx0316085
245    10
$a Novel approach to decision making for orphan drugs / $c B. Decker, T. Mlcoch, A. Pustovalova, T. Dolezal
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Out of 185 orphan medicinal products (OMPs) registered in 2015-2021, a mere 110 (59 percent) were available to Czech patients, and only 54 (29 percent) were officially reimbursed. Moreover, this proportion has steadily decreased over time. After years of public debate induced by this unsatisfactory OMP patient access, the national viewpoint shifted toward creating a special pathway for the reimbursement of OMP. Thus, a rigorous pricing and reimbursement procedure with strict timelines and elaborated methodology has been recently adopted in Czechia. METHODOLOGY: The innovative legislation follows the recommendations for value assessment and funding processes for rare diseases and incorporates additional elements of value, such as the societal perspective. First, the application with clinical evidence, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact analyses is submitted to the governmental health technology assessment (HTA) agency by the Marketing Authorization Holder or a Health Insurance Fund. Moreover, professional associations and patients' organizations are rightful participants in the proceeding, providing evidence and comments. Then, the HTA agency performs the assessment/appraisal of the evidence. It subsequently publishes the assessment report summarizing available information. The report is then forwarded to the Ministry of Health and its advisory body consisting of patients, clinical experts, health insurance funds, and the State. They critically evaluate the documents and issue a binding opinion following prespecified decision-making criteria. Based on this binding opinion, the decision is issued by the HTA agency. Thus, the role of the advisory body in this process is crucial. CONCLUSION: We believe that this novel approach may offer satisfactory patient access to orphan drugs. Moreover, it serves as a real-world example of "value-based" decision making.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a výroba orphan drugs $7 D009965
650    12
$a vzácné nemoci $x farmakoterapie $7 D035583
650    _2
$a úhrada zdravotního pojištění $7 D007349
650    _2
$a hodnocení biomedicínských technologií $7 D013673
650    _2
$a rozhodování $7 D003657
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mlcoch, Tomas $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Pustovalova, Anastasie $u Cogvio, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Dolezal, Tomas $u Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czechia $u Cogvio, Prague, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00002378 $t International journal of technology assessment in health care $x 1471-6348 $g Roč. 39, č. 1 (2023), s. e10
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36748356 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230418 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240410140045 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1924728 $s 1190441
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 39 $c 1 $d e10 $e 20230207 $i 1471-6348 $m International journal of technology assessment in health care $n Int J Technol Assess Health Care $x MED00002378
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230418

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...