-
Something wrong with this record ?
Deeds and Words: Farmers' Attitude-Paradox in Collective Action for Small-Scale Irrigation
S. Miao, X. Zhu, W. Heijman, Z. Xu, Q. Lu
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
PubMed Central
from 2005
Europe PubMed Central
from 2005
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2004
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Attitude MeSH
- Water MeSH
- Farmers * MeSH
- Agriculture * methods MeSH
- Environment MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
We explore the mechanisms of the attitude-behavior paradox and how multiple stakeholders strategize to compromise their attitudes and behaviors. Through an instrumental variable probit model, we examine the effect of income heterogeneity and social ties on the farmers' attitude-behavior paradox for collective action. The empirical results demonstrate that weak and strong ties, income heterogeneity, interaction terms, education, community environment, and community rules negatively affect the paradox, whereas water stealing and water use conflicts positively affect it. After dividing the paradox into two forms, we find that weak ties, the interaction terms thereof, negatively affect the paradox for "having negative attitude but do have behavior", while income heterogeneity negatively affects the paradox for "having positive attitude but no behavior". We contribute to the understanding of mechanisms whereby economic incentives and social structures interplay in addressing the above paradox. We conclude by discussing the implications for policies to overcome this social dilemma.
Business School Yangzhou University Yangzhou 225127 China
Department of Economics and Management Northwest A and F University Xianyang 712100 China
Department of Economics Czech University of Life Sciences Prague 165 00 Prague Czech Republic
Development and Research Institute of Central Jiangsu Yangzhou University Yangzhou 225009 China
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23004864
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425171750.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2022 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph20010549 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36612871
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Miao, Shanshan $u Development and Research Institute of Central Jiangsu, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
- 245 10
- $a Deeds and Words: Farmers' Attitude-Paradox in Collective Action for Small-Scale Irrigation / $c S. Miao, X. Zhu, W. Heijman, Z. Xu, Q. Lu
- 520 9_
- $a We explore the mechanisms of the attitude-behavior paradox and how multiple stakeholders strategize to compromise their attitudes and behaviors. Through an instrumental variable probit model, we examine the effect of income heterogeneity and social ties on the farmers' attitude-behavior paradox for collective action. The empirical results demonstrate that weak and strong ties, income heterogeneity, interaction terms, education, community environment, and community rules negatively affect the paradox, whereas water stealing and water use conflicts positively affect it. After dividing the paradox into two forms, we find that weak ties, the interaction terms thereof, negatively affect the paradox for "having negative attitude but do have behavior", while income heterogeneity negatively affects the paradox for "having positive attitude but no behavior". We contribute to the understanding of mechanisms whereby economic incentives and social structures interplay in addressing the above paradox. We conclude by discussing the implications for policies to overcome this social dilemma.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a zemědělci $7 D000067565
- 650 12
- $a zemědělství $x metody $7 D000383
- 650 _2
- $a postoj $7 D001290
- 650 _2
- $a životní prostředí $7 D004777
- 650 _2
- $a voda $7 D014867
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Zhu, Xueqin $u Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Group, Wageningen University, 6708 WG Wageningen, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000257721090
- 700 1_
- $a Heijman, Wim $u Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, 6708 WG Wageningen, The Netherlands $u Department of Economics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000305143855
- 700 1_
- $a Xu, Zengwei $u Business School, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
- 700 1_
- $a Lu, Qian $u Department of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 20, č. 1 (2022)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36612871 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425171746 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1925137 $s 1191073
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 20 $c 1 $e 20221229 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418