Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Sequential hybrid ablation versus surgical CryoMaze alone for treatment of atrial fibrillation (SurHyb Trial): a protocol of the multicentre randomized controlled trial

A. Bulava, A. Mokracek, D. Wichterle, P. Budera, P. Osmancik, P. Kacer, L. Veteskova, P. Nemec, T. Skala, P. Santavy, J. Chovancik, P. Branny, V. Rizov, M. Kolesar, M. Rybar

. 2023 ; 21 (2) : 67-72. [pub] 20230511

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Clinical Trial Protocol, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is common in patients with structural heart disease who are undergoing cardiac surgery. Surgical CryoMaze has been shown to be an effective treatment in several trials, but success rates have varied considerably, between 47-95%. The sequential hybrid approach, combining surgical CryoMaze followed by radiofrequency catheter ablation, can achieve high freedom from atrial arrhythmias. However, in patients with concomitant surgical atrial fibrillation treatment, data comparing the hybrid approach to CryoMaze alone are lacking. METHODS: The SurHyb study was designed as a prospective, open-label, multicentre randomized trial. Patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who were scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting or valve repair/replacement were randomized to either surgical CryoMaze alone or surgical CryoMaze followed by radiofrequency catheter ablation 3 months post-surgery. The primary outcome measure was arrhythmia-free survival without class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs, which has been evaluated using implantable cardiac monitors. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized study that compares concomitant surgical CryoMaze alone with the staged hybrid surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation, in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using rigorous rhythm monitoring. The results may contribute to the optimization of the treatment in patients undergoing concomitant CryoMaze for atrial fibrillation.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23008973
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231220142208.0
007      
ta
008      
230707s2023 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.32725/jab.2023.007 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37212155
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Bulava, Alan, $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences; Cardiac Centre, Ceske Budejovice Hospital, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic $d 1974- $7 xx0106839
245    10
$a Sequential hybrid ablation versus surgical CryoMaze alone for treatment of atrial fibrillation (SurHyb Trial): a protocol of the multicentre randomized controlled trial / $c A. Bulava, A. Mokracek, D. Wichterle, P. Budera, P. Osmancik, P. Kacer, L. Veteskova, P. Nemec, T. Skala, P. Santavy, J. Chovancik, P. Branny, V. Rizov, M. Kolesar, M. Rybar
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is common in patients with structural heart disease who are undergoing cardiac surgery. Surgical CryoMaze has been shown to be an effective treatment in several trials, but success rates have varied considerably, between 47-95%. The sequential hybrid approach, combining surgical CryoMaze followed by radiofrequency catheter ablation, can achieve high freedom from atrial arrhythmias. However, in patients with concomitant surgical atrial fibrillation treatment, data comparing the hybrid approach to CryoMaze alone are lacking. METHODS: The SurHyb study was designed as a prospective, open-label, multicentre randomized trial. Patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who were scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting or valve repair/replacement were randomized to either surgical CryoMaze alone or surgical CryoMaze followed by radiofrequency catheter ablation 3 months post-surgery. The primary outcome measure was arrhythmia-free survival without class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs, which has been evaluated using implantable cardiac monitors. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized study that compares concomitant surgical CryoMaze alone with the staged hybrid surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation, in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using rigorous rhythm monitoring. The results may contribute to the optimization of the treatment in patients undergoing concomitant CryoMaze for atrial fibrillation.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a antiarytmika $x terapeutické užití $7 D000889
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $x farmakoterapie $7 D001281
650    12
$a kardiochirurgické výkony $x metody $7 D006348
650    12
$a katetrizační ablace $x metody $7 D017115
650    _2
$a multicentrické studie jako téma $7 D015337
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a protokol klinické studie $7 D000078325
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Mokráček, Aleš, $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences; Cardiac Centre, Ceske Budejovice Hospital, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic $d 1966- $7 xx0094268
700    1_
$a Wichterle, Dan $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic $7 xx0101417
700    1_
$a Budera, Petr $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic $7 xx0270813
700    1_
$a Osmančík, Pavel, $u Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic $d 1972- $7 xx0104796
700    1_
$a Kačer, Petr, $u Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic $d 1969 září 21.- $7 xx0230547
700    1_
$a Vetešková, Linda $u Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0229433
700    1_
$a Němec, Petr, $u Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, Brno, Czech Republic $d 1954- $7 xx0033694
700    1_
$a Skála, Tomáš $u Palacky University, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry; University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0137536
700    1_
$a Šantavý, Petr, $u Palacky University, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry; University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1973- $7 xx0211055
700    1_
$a Chovančík, Jan $u Hospital Agel Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czech Republic $7 xx0070638
700    1_
$a Branny, Piotr, $u Hospital Agel Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czech Republic $d 1968- $7 xx0051478
700    1_
$a Rizov, Vitalii $u Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic $7 xx0304648
700    1_
$a Kolesár, Miroslav $u Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic $7 xx0148604
700    1_
$a Rybář, Marian $u Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Technology, Kladno, Czech Republic $7 xx0311830
773    0_
$w MED00012667 $t Journal of applied biomedicine $x 1214-0287 $g Roč. 21, č. 2 (2023), s. 67-72
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37212155 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2301 $c 1249 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230707 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231220142204 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1964391 $s 1195236
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 21 $c 2 $d 67-72 $e 20230511 $i 1214-0287 $m Journal of Applied Biomedicine $n J. Appl. Biomed. (Čes. Budějovice Print) $x MED00012667
LZP    __
$b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20230707

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...