• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Low Initial Adherence with Flash Glucose Monitoring is Not a Predictor of Long-Term Glycemic Outcomes: Longitudinal Analysis of the Association Between Experience, Adherence, and Glucose Control for FreeStyle Libre Users

J. Šoupal, K. Kao, L. Brandner, G. Grunberger, M. Prázný

. 2023 ; 14 (7) : 1231-1240. [pub] 20230522

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23009470

Grantová podpora
RVO-VFN00064165 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky

INTRODUCTION: Frequent scanning of FreeStyle Libre (FSL) flash glucose monitoring sensors is known to be important whilst wearing an active sensor, but adherence to sensor reapplication is also critical to effective glucose monitoring. We report novel measures of adherence for users of the FSL system and their association with improvements in metrics of glucose control. METHODS: Anonymous data were extracted for 1600 FSL users in the Czech Republic with ≥ 36 completed sensors from October 22, 2018 to December 31, 2021. "Experience" was defined by the number of sensors used (1-36 sensors). "Adherence" was defined by time between the end of one sensor and the start of the next (gap time). User adherence was analyzed for four experience levels after initiating FLASH; Start (sensors 1-3); Early (sensors 4-6); Middle (sensors 19-21); End (sensors 34-36). Users were split into two adherence levels based on mean gap time during Start period, "low" (> 24 h, n = 723) and "high" (≤ 8 h, n = 877). RESULTS: Low-adherence users reduced their sensor gap times significantly: 38.5% applied a new sensor within 24 h during sensors 4-6, rising to 65.0% by sensors 34-36 (p < 0.001). Improved adherence was associated with increased %TIR (time in range; mean + 2.4%; p < 0.001), reduced %TAR (time above range; mean - 3.1%; p < 0.001), and reduced glucose coefficient of variation (CV; mean - 1.7%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With experience, FSL users became more adherent in sensor reapplication, with associated increases in %TIR, and reductions in %TAR and glucose variability.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23009470
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230721095600.0
007      
ta
008      
230707s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s13300-023-01422-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37211580
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Šoupal, Jan $u 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. jan.soupal@seznam.cz
245    10
$a Low Initial Adherence with Flash Glucose Monitoring is Not a Predictor of Long-Term Glycemic Outcomes: Longitudinal Analysis of the Association Between Experience, Adherence, and Glucose Control for FreeStyle Libre Users / $c J. Šoupal, K. Kao, L. Brandner, G. Grunberger, M. Prázný
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Frequent scanning of FreeStyle Libre (FSL) flash glucose monitoring sensors is known to be important whilst wearing an active sensor, but adherence to sensor reapplication is also critical to effective glucose monitoring. We report novel measures of adherence for users of the FSL system and their association with improvements in metrics of glucose control. METHODS: Anonymous data were extracted for 1600 FSL users in the Czech Republic with ≥ 36 completed sensors from October 22, 2018 to December 31, 2021. "Experience" was defined by the number of sensors used (1-36 sensors). "Adherence" was defined by time between the end of one sensor and the start of the next (gap time). User adherence was analyzed for four experience levels after initiating FLASH; Start (sensors 1-3); Early (sensors 4-6); Middle (sensors 19-21); End (sensors 34-36). Users were split into two adherence levels based on mean gap time during Start period, "low" (> 24 h, n = 723) and "high" (≤ 8 h, n = 877). RESULTS: Low-adherence users reduced their sensor gap times significantly: 38.5% applied a new sensor within 24 h during sensors 4-6, rising to 65.0% by sensors 34-36 (p < 0.001). Improved adherence was associated with increased %TIR (time in range; mean + 2.4%; p < 0.001), reduced %TAR (time above range; mean - 3.1%; p < 0.001), and reduced glucose coefficient of variation (CV; mean - 1.7%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With experience, FSL users became more adherent in sensor reapplication, with associated increases in %TIR, and reductions in %TAR and glucose variability.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kao, Kalvin $u Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA, USA
700    1_
$a Brandner, Laura $u Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA, USA
700    1_
$a Grunberger, George $u Grunberger Diabetes Institute, Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA $u Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
700    1_
$a Prázný, Martin $u 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00194311 $t Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders $x 1869-6953 $g Roč. 14, č. 7 (2023), s. 1231-1240
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37211580 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230707 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230721095554 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1958383 $s 1195734
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 14 $c 7 $d 1231-1240 $e 20230522 $i 1869-6953 $m Diabetes therapy $n Diabetes Ther $x MED00194311
GRA    __
$a RVO-VFN00064165 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230707

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...