Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study

M. Striteska, M. Chovanec, T. Steinmetzer, V. Chrobok, O. Profant, E. Schneider, J. Kremlacek, M. Valis

. 2023 ; 14 (-) : 1153102. [pub] 20230503

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23009840

INTRODUCTION: The video head impulse test (vHIT) evaluates the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). It's usually recorded from only one eye. Newer vHIT devices allow a binocular quantification of the VOR. PURPOSE AIM: To investigate the advantages of simultaneously recorded binocular vHIT (bvHIT) to detect the differences between the VOR gains of the adducting and the abducting eye, to define the most precise VOR measure, and to assess gaze dys/conjugacy. We aimed to establish normative values for bvHIT adducting/abducting eye VOR gains and to introduce the VOR dysconjugacy ratio (vorDR) between adducting and abducting eyes for bvHIT. METHODS: We enrolled 44 healthy adult participants in a cross-sectional, prospective study using a repeated-measures design to assess test-retest reliability. A binocular EyeSeeCam Sci 2 device was used to simultaneously record bvHIT from both eyes during impulsive head stimulation in the horizontal plane. RESULTS: Pooled bvHIT retest gains of the adducting eye significantly exceeded those of the abducting eye (mean (SD): 1.08 (SD = 0.06), 0.95 (SD = 0.06), respectively). Both adduction and abduction gains showed similar variability, suggesting comparable precision and therefore equal suitability for VOR asymmetry assessment. The pooled vorDR here introduced to bvHIT was 1.13 (SD = 0.05). The test-retest repeatability coefficient was 0.06. CONCLUSION: Our study provides normative values reflecting the conjugacy of eye movement responses to horizontal bvHIT in healthy participants. The results were similar to a previous study using the gold-standard scleral search coil, which also reported greater VOR gains in the adducting than in the abducting eye. In analogy to the analysis of saccade conjugacy, we propose the use of a novel bvHIT dysconjugacy ratio to assess dys/conjugacy of VOR-induced eye movements. In addition, to accurately assess VOR asymmetry, and to avoid directional gain preponderance between adduction and abduction VOR-induced eye movements leading to monocular vHIT bias, we recommend using a binocular ductional VOR asymmetry index that compares the VOR gains of only the abduction or only the adduction movements of both eyes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23009840
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230721095435.0
007      
ta
008      
230707s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fneur.2023.1153102 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37206911
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Striteska, Maja $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czechia $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
245    10
$a Binocular video head impulse test: Normative data study / $c M. Striteska, M. Chovanec, T. Steinmetzer, V. Chrobok, O. Profant, E. Schneider, J. Kremlacek, M. Valis
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: The video head impulse test (vHIT) evaluates the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). It's usually recorded from only one eye. Newer vHIT devices allow a binocular quantification of the VOR. PURPOSE AIM: To investigate the advantages of simultaneously recorded binocular vHIT (bvHIT) to detect the differences between the VOR gains of the adducting and the abducting eye, to define the most precise VOR measure, and to assess gaze dys/conjugacy. We aimed to establish normative values for bvHIT adducting/abducting eye VOR gains and to introduce the VOR dysconjugacy ratio (vorDR) between adducting and abducting eyes for bvHIT. METHODS: We enrolled 44 healthy adult participants in a cross-sectional, prospective study using a repeated-measures design to assess test-retest reliability. A binocular EyeSeeCam Sci 2 device was used to simultaneously record bvHIT from both eyes during impulsive head stimulation in the horizontal plane. RESULTS: Pooled bvHIT retest gains of the adducting eye significantly exceeded those of the abducting eye (mean (SD): 1.08 (SD = 0.06), 0.95 (SD = 0.06), respectively). Both adduction and abduction gains showed similar variability, suggesting comparable precision and therefore equal suitability for VOR asymmetry assessment. The pooled vorDR here introduced to bvHIT was 1.13 (SD = 0.05). The test-retest repeatability coefficient was 0.06. CONCLUSION: Our study provides normative values reflecting the conjugacy of eye movement responses to horizontal bvHIT in healthy participants. The results were similar to a previous study using the gold-standard scleral search coil, which also reported greater VOR gains in the adducting than in the abducting eye. In analogy to the analysis of saccade conjugacy, we propose the use of a novel bvHIT dysconjugacy ratio to assess dys/conjugacy of VOR-induced eye movements. In addition, to accurately assess VOR asymmetry, and to avoid directional gain preponderance between adduction and abduction VOR-induced eye movements leading to monocular vHIT bias, we recommend using a binocular ductional VOR asymmetry index that compares the VOR gains of only the abduction or only the adduction movements of both eyes.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Chovanec, Martin $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Steinmetzer, Tobias $u Institute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany
700    1_
$a Chrobok, Viktor $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czechia
700    1_
$a Profant, Oliver $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia $u Department of Auditory Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Medicine (ASCR), Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Schneider, Erich $u Institute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany
700    1_
$a Kremlacek, Jan $u Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czechia
700    1_
$a Valis, Martin $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Prague, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00174552 $t Frontiers in neurology $x 1664-2295 $g Roč. 14, č. - (2023), s. 1153102
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37206911 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230707 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230721095428 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1958526 $s 1196104
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 14 $c - $d 1153102 $e 20230503 $i 1664-2295 $m Frontiers in neurology $n Front. neurol. $x MED00174552
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230707

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...