-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Twelve years of assessing the quality of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders
ZC. Deans, A. Biricik, M. De Rycke, GL. Harton, M. Hornak, F. Khawaja, C. Moutou, J. Traeger-Synodinos, P. Renwick
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
CPA UK (Ltd)
PubMed
36371615
DOI
10.1002/pd.6263
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- aneuploidie MeSH
- blastocysta MeSH
- genetické testování metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- preimplantační diagnóza * metody MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Genomics Quality Assessment has provided external quality assessments (EQAs) for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for 12 years for eight monogenic diseases to identify sub-optimal PGT strategies, testing and reporting of results, which can be shared with the genomics community to aid optimised standards of PGT services for couples. METHOD: The EQAs were provided in two stages to mimic end-to-end protocols. Stage 1 involved DNA feasibility testing of a couple undergoing PGT and affected proband. Participants were required to report genotyping results and outline their embryo testing strategy. Lymphoblasts were distributed for mock embryo testing for stage 2. Submitted clinical reports and haplotyping results were assessed against peer-ratified criteria. Performance was monitored to identify poor performance. RESULTS: The most common testing methodology was short tandem repeat linkage analysis (59%); however, the adoption of single nucleotide polymorphism-based platforms was observed and a move from blastomere to trophectoderm testing. There was a variation in testing strategies, assigning marker informativity and understanding test limitations, some clinically unsafe. Critical errors were reported for genotyping and interpretation. CONCLUSION: EQA provides an overview of the standard of preimplantation genetic testing-M clinical testing and identifies areas of improvement for accurate detection of high-risk embryos.
BioSkryb Genomics Durham North Carolina USA
Centre for Medical Genetics Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel Brussels Belgium
Eurofins Genoma Laboratories Rome Italy
GenQA Department of Laboratory Medicine Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh NHS Lothian Edinburgh UK
Laboratory for Medical and Reproductive Genetics REPROMEDA Biology Park Brno Czechia USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23010595
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230801132525.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/pd.6263 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36371615
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Deans, Zandra C $u GenQA, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000193616012
- 245 10
- $a Twelve years of assessing the quality of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders / $c ZC. Deans, A. Biricik, M. De Rycke, GL. Harton, M. Hornak, F. Khawaja, C. Moutou, J. Traeger-Synodinos, P. Renwick
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: Genomics Quality Assessment has provided external quality assessments (EQAs) for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for 12 years for eight monogenic diseases to identify sub-optimal PGT strategies, testing and reporting of results, which can be shared with the genomics community to aid optimised standards of PGT services for couples. METHOD: The EQAs were provided in two stages to mimic end-to-end protocols. Stage 1 involved DNA feasibility testing of a couple undergoing PGT and affected proband. Participants were required to report genotyping results and outline their embryo testing strategy. Lymphoblasts were distributed for mock embryo testing for stage 2. Submitted clinical reports and haplotyping results were assessed against peer-ratified criteria. Performance was monitored to identify poor performance. RESULTS: The most common testing methodology was short tandem repeat linkage analysis (59%); however, the adoption of single nucleotide polymorphism-based platforms was observed and a move from blastomere to trophectoderm testing. There was a variation in testing strategies, assigning marker informativity and understanding test limitations, some clinically unsafe. Critical errors were reported for genotyping and interpretation. CONCLUSION: EQA provides an overview of the standard of preimplantation genetic testing-M clinical testing and identifies areas of improvement for accurate detection of high-risk embryos.
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a preimplantační diagnóza $x metody $7 D019836
- 650 _2
- $a genetické testování $x metody $7 D005820
- 650 _2
- $a blastocysta $7 D001755
- 650 _2
- $a aneuploidie $7 D000782
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Biricik, Anil $u Eurofins Genoma Laboratories, Rome, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a De Rycke, Martine $u Centre for Medical Genetics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Harton, Gary L $u BioSkryb Genomics, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Hornak, Miroslav $u Laboratory for Medical and Reproductive Genetics, REPROMEDA Biology Park, Brno, Czechia, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Khawaja, Farrah $u GenQA, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Moutou, Céline $u Laboratoire de Diagnostic préimplantatoire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- 700 1_
- $a Traeger-Synodinos, Jan $u Laboratory of Medical Genetics, St. Sophia's Children's Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- 700 1_
- $a Renwick, Pamela $u Centre for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Guys Hospital, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation, London, UK
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003882 $t Prenatal diagnosis $x 1097-0223 $g Roč. 43, č. 4 (2023), s. 506-515
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36371615 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230801132522 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963184 $s 1196860
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 43 $c 4 $d 506-515 $e 20221118 $i 1097-0223 $m Prenatal diagnosis $n Prenat Diagn $x MED00003882
- GRA __
- $p CPA UK (Ltd)
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718