-
Something wrong with this record ?
Histological mapping of healing of the small and large intestine - A quantitative study in a porcine model
T. Kural, M. Grajciarová, J. Rosendorf, R. Pálek, L. Červenková, A. Malečková, S. Šarčevic, V. Liška, Z. Tonar
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Anastomosis, Surgical methods MeSH
- Wound Healing * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Swine MeSH
- Intestines MeSH
- Intestine, Small * MeSH
- Intestine, Large MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal anastomoses are performed in many patients every year. The pathogenesis of aberrant anastomotic healing and the causes of intestinal leakage are not fully understood. The present study gathered and critically evaluated histological quantitative data to deepen current knowledge of anastomotic healing in the small and large intestine and its complications and outline the options for further experimental in vivo research in large porcine animal models. METHODS: Three groups of porcine intestinal anastomoses were compared: small intestine without defect (SI; n = 7), small intestine with an additional defect (SID; n = 8), and large intestine (LI; n = 7). Multilevel sampling (2112 micrographs) and stereological methods were used for histological quantification of proliferation (Ki-67 immunohistochemistry), neutrophil infiltration (myeloperoxidase staining), vascularity (von Willebrand factor) and type I and type III collagen formation (picrosirius red in polarized light) within the region of anastomosis compared to the region outside of anastomosis. RESULTS: Quantitative histological evaluation revealed the following results. i) Proliferation, vascularity, and collagen, but not neutrophils, were more highly expressed within the anastomosis than outside of the anastomosis region. ii) Porcine large and small intestine were not interchangeable based on histological evaluation of surgical experiments. The presence or absence of an additional experimental defect strongly affected healing, but the healing seemed complete after 21 days. iii) The microscopic structure of small intestine segments was more affected by their proximity to the anastomosis than the structure of large intestine segments. CONCLUSIONS: Histological quantification was more laborious than the previously used semiquantitative scoring system evaluating the healing rate of intestinal anastomoses, but it provided detailed maps of biological processes within individual intestine layers. The primary data collected in the study are open and available for power sample analyses to calculate the minimum numbers of samples justified in future experiments on porcine intestines. The porcine intestine is a promising animal model with translational potential for human surgery.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23010841
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230801132640.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.aanat.2023.152095 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37011825
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Kural, Tomáš $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Arberlandklinik Viechtach, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Karl-Gareis-Straße 31, 942 34 Viechtach, Germany
- 245 10
- $a Histological mapping of healing of the small and large intestine - A quantitative study in a porcine model / $c T. Kural, M. Grajciarová, J. Rosendorf, R. Pálek, L. Červenková, A. Malečková, S. Šarčevic, V. Liška, Z. Tonar
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal anastomoses are performed in many patients every year. The pathogenesis of aberrant anastomotic healing and the causes of intestinal leakage are not fully understood. The present study gathered and critically evaluated histological quantitative data to deepen current knowledge of anastomotic healing in the small and large intestine and its complications and outline the options for further experimental in vivo research in large porcine animal models. METHODS: Three groups of porcine intestinal anastomoses were compared: small intestine without defect (SI; n = 7), small intestine with an additional defect (SID; n = 8), and large intestine (LI; n = 7). Multilevel sampling (2112 micrographs) and stereological methods were used for histological quantification of proliferation (Ki-67 immunohistochemistry), neutrophil infiltration (myeloperoxidase staining), vascularity (von Willebrand factor) and type I and type III collagen formation (picrosirius red in polarized light) within the region of anastomosis compared to the region outside of anastomosis. RESULTS: Quantitative histological evaluation revealed the following results. i) Proliferation, vascularity, and collagen, but not neutrophils, were more highly expressed within the anastomosis than outside of the anastomosis region. ii) Porcine large and small intestine were not interchangeable based on histological evaluation of surgical experiments. The presence or absence of an additional experimental defect strongly affected healing, but the healing seemed complete after 21 days. iii) The microscopic structure of small intestine segments was more affected by their proximity to the anastomosis than the structure of large intestine segments. CONCLUSIONS: Histological quantification was more laborious than the previously used semiquantitative scoring system evaluating the healing rate of intestinal anastomoses, but it provided detailed maps of biological processes within individual intestine layers. The primary data collected in the study are open and available for power sample analyses to calculate the minimum numbers of samples justified in future experiments on porcine intestines. The porcine intestine is a promising animal model with translational potential for human surgery.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 650 12
- $a hojení ran $7 D014945
- 650 _2
- $a anastomóza chirurgická $x metody $7 D000714
- 650 12
- $a tenké střevo $7 D007421
- 650 _2
- $a tlusté střevo $7 D007420
- 650 _2
- $a střeva $7 D007422
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Grajciarová, Martina $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rosendorf, Jáchym $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pálek, Richard $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Červenková, Lenka $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Department of Pathology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Malečková, Anna $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Šarčevic, Sima $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Liška, Václav $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tonar, Zbyněk $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic; Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic. Electronic address: tonar@lfp.cuni.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000417 $t Annals of anatomy Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft $x 1618-0402 $g Roč. 249, č. - (2023), s. 152095
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37011825 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230801132637 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963325 $s 1197106
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 249 $c - $d 152095 $e 20230401 $i 1618-0402 $m Annals of anatomy $n Ann Anat $x MED00000417
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718