-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Pathoanatomy of pertrochanteric fractures - a postmortem study
J. Bartoníček, R. Bartoška, J. Alt, O. Naňka, M. Tuček
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- femur MeSH
- fraktury femuru * MeSH
- fraktury kyčle * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie metody MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- zobrazování trojrozměrné metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Recent pathoanatomic studies based on 3D CT reconstructions have questioned validity of AO/OTA classification because it does not reflect the reality and requires revision. These 3D CT studies, however, do not allow analysis of all details. Therefore, we have exploited the possibility to analyze the pathoanatomy of pertrochanteric fractures on postmortem specimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the collection of the Institute of Anatomy, the authors obtained 16 specimens of hip joints of individuals who had sustained a pertrochanteric fracture and died within 30 days of the injury, with anteroposterior radiographs of the injured hip available in all of them. The number of major fragments and their shape, and the courses of the main fracture lines were studied. RESULTS: Three major fragments (a proximal head and neck fragment, a distal diaphyseal fragment and a posterior flat fragment), separated by three types of fracture lines (primary, secondary and tertiary lines) were identified. The primary line separated the proximal fragment (head and neck) from the distal diaphyseal fragment. The secondary fracture line separated the posterior flat fragment from the distal diaphyseal fragment. The tertiary fracture line split the posterior fragment into two parts. A key factor for fracture instability is the defect of the posterior cortex, which depends on the size and shape of the posterior fragment. Avulsion of the lesser trochanter and the adjacent cortex results in an unstable configuration of fracture lines on the medial side, while on the lateral side a large posterior fragment weakens the lateral trochanteric wall. CONCLUSION: In agreement with recent CT studies, the findings of this pathoanatomical study change, in a number of aspects, the traditional view of the pathoanatomy and classification of pertrochanteric fractures, and introduces the concept of three, instead of the traditional four, main fragments.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23010885
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230801132655.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.047 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37169696
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Bartoníček, Jan $u Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 169 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic; First Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, 128 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Pathoanatomy of pertrochanteric fractures - a postmortem study / $c J. Bartoníček, R. Bartoška, J. Alt, O. Naňka, M. Tuček
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Recent pathoanatomic studies based on 3D CT reconstructions have questioned validity of AO/OTA classification because it does not reflect the reality and requires revision. These 3D CT studies, however, do not allow analysis of all details. Therefore, we have exploited the possibility to analyze the pathoanatomy of pertrochanteric fractures on postmortem specimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the collection of the Institute of Anatomy, the authors obtained 16 specimens of hip joints of individuals who had sustained a pertrochanteric fracture and died within 30 days of the injury, with anteroposterior radiographs of the injured hip available in all of them. The number of major fragments and their shape, and the courses of the main fracture lines were studied. RESULTS: Three major fragments (a proximal head and neck fragment, a distal diaphyseal fragment and a posterior flat fragment), separated by three types of fracture lines (primary, secondary and tertiary lines) were identified. The primary line separated the proximal fragment (head and neck) from the distal diaphyseal fragment. The secondary fracture line separated the posterior flat fragment from the distal diaphyseal fragment. The tertiary fracture line split the posterior fragment into two parts. A key factor for fracture instability is the defect of the posterior cortex, which depends on the size and shape of the posterior fragment. Avulsion of the lesser trochanter and the adjacent cortex results in an unstable configuration of fracture lines on the medial side, while on the lateral side a large posterior fragment weakens the lateral trochanteric wall. CONCLUSION: In agreement with recent CT studies, the findings of this pathoanatomical study change, in a number of aspects, the traditional view of the pathoanatomy and classification of pertrochanteric fractures, and introduces the concept of three, instead of the traditional four, main fragments.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a fraktury kyčle $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D006620
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
- 650 12
- $a fraktury femuru $7 D005264
- 650 _2
- $a femur $7 D005269
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bartoška, Radek $u Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Šrobárova 1150/50, 100 34 Prague 10, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Alt, Jan $u Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 169 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Naňka, Ondřej $u First Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, 128 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tuček, Michal $u Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 169 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic. Electronic address: tucekmic@gmail.com
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002253 $t Injury $x 1879-0267 $g Roč. 54, č. 7 (2023), s. 110760
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37169696 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230801132652 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963351 $s 1197150
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 54 $c 7 $d 110760 $e 20230430 $i 1879-0267 $m Injury $n Injury $x MED00002253
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718