• Something wrong with this record ?

Thresholds for surfactant use in preterm neonates: a network meta-analysis

A. Branagan, I. Yu, K. Gurusamy, J. Miletin

. 2023 ; 108 (4) : 333-341. [pub] 20221209

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-01-01 to 6 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 6 months ago

OBJECTIVE: To perform a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of different surfactant treatment strategies for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) to assess if a certain fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is optimal for selective surfactant therapy. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis using Bayesian analysis of randomised trials of prophylactic versus selective surfactant for RDS. SETTING: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase and Science Citation Index Expanded. PATIENTS: Randomised trials including infants under 32 weeks of gestational age. INTERVENTIONS: Intratracheal surfactant, irrespective of type or dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome was neonatal mortality, compared between groups treated with selective surfactant therapy at different thresholds of FiO2. Secondary outcomes included respiratory morbidity and major complications of prematurity. RESULTS: Of 4643 identified references, 14 studies involving 5298 participants were included. We found no statistically significant differences between 30%, 40% and 50% FiO2 thresholds. A sensitivity analysis of infants treated in the era of high antenatal steroid use and nasal continuous positive airway pressure as initial mode of respiratory support showed no difference in mortality, RDS or intraventricular haemorrhage alone but suggested an increase in the combined outcome of major morbidities in the 60% threshold. CONCLUSION: Our results do not show a clear benefit of surfactant treatment at any threshold of FiO2. The 60% threshold was suggestive of increased morbidity. There was no advantage seen with prophylactic treatment. Randomised trials of different thresholds for surfactant delivery are urgently needed to guide clinicians and provide robust evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020166620.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23010960
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230801132728.0
007      
ta
008      
230718s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324184 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36600484
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Branagan, Aoife $u Paediatric and Newborn Medicine, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland branagaa@tcd.ie $u Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000152205372
245    10
$a Thresholds for surfactant use in preterm neonates: a network meta-analysis / $c A. Branagan, I. Yu, K. Gurusamy, J. Miletin
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To perform a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of different surfactant treatment strategies for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) to assess if a certain fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is optimal for selective surfactant therapy. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis using Bayesian analysis of randomised trials of prophylactic versus selective surfactant for RDS. SETTING: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase and Science Citation Index Expanded. PATIENTS: Randomised trials including infants under 32 weeks of gestational age. INTERVENTIONS: Intratracheal surfactant, irrespective of type or dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome was neonatal mortality, compared between groups treated with selective surfactant therapy at different thresholds of FiO2. Secondary outcomes included respiratory morbidity and major complications of prematurity. RESULTS: Of 4643 identified references, 14 studies involving 5298 participants were included. We found no statistically significant differences between 30%, 40% and 50% FiO2 thresholds. A sensitivity analysis of infants treated in the era of high antenatal steroid use and nasal continuous positive airway pressure as initial mode of respiratory support showed no difference in mortality, RDS or intraventricular haemorrhage alone but suggested an increase in the combined outcome of major morbidities in the 60% threshold. CONCLUSION: Our results do not show a clear benefit of surfactant treatment at any threshold of FiO2. The 60% threshold was suggestive of increased morbidity. There was no advantage seen with prophylactic treatment. Randomised trials of different thresholds for surfactant delivery are urgently needed to guide clinicians and provide robust evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020166620.
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a povrchově aktivní látky $7 D013501
650    _2
$a síťová metaanalýza $7 D000071076
650    _2
$a Bayesova věta $7 D001499
650    _2
$a novorozenec nedonošený $7 D007234
650    12
$a plicní surfaktanty $x terapeutické užití $7 D011663
650    12
$a syndrom respirační tísně novorozenců $x farmakoterapie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D012127
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Yu, Ivan $u Paediatric and Newborn Medicine, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland $u Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK
700    1_
$a Gurusamy, Kurinchi $u Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK $u Department of Therapy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moskva, Russian Federation
700    1_
$a Miletin, Jan $u Paediatric and Newborn Medicine, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland $u UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic $u 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000304896054 $7 xx0071047
773    0_
$w MED00004943 $t Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition $x 1468-2052 $g Roč. 108, č. 4 (2023), s. 333-341
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36600484 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230801132725 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1963406 $s 1197225
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 108 $c 4 $d 333-341 $e 20221209 $i 1468-2052 $m Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition $n Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed $x MED00004943
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230718

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...