-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Impact of piflufolastat F-18 PSMA PET imaging on clinical decision-making in prostate cancer across disease states: A retrospective review
AT. Arafa, A. Jain, P. Skrobanek, B. Humphrey, JW. Froelich, ES. Antonarakis
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36999911
DOI
10.1002/pros.24527
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prostaty * diagnostické zobrazování patologie MeSH
- PET/CT * metody MeSH
- pozitronová emisní tomografie MeSH
- prostatický specifický antigen MeSH
- radioizotopy galia MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Piflufolastat F-18 (18F-DCFPyL) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is approved by the US food and drug administration for initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and restaging of metastatic prostate cancer. Here, we sought to assess how its integration into clinical care may have impacted the management of patients. METHODS: We identified 235 consecutive patients who underwent an 18F-DCFPyL PET scan from August 2021 to June 2022. The median prostate-specific antigen at the time of imaging was 1.8 ng/mL (Range: 0-3740 ng/mL). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze its impact on clinical care for a subset of 157 patients with available treatment information: 22 for initial staging, 109 with BCR, and 26 patients with known metastatic disease. RESULTS: PSMA-avid lesions were detected in 154/235 (65.5% of) patients. In patients undergoing initial staging, 18/39 (46.2% of) patients had extra-prostatic metastatic lesions; 15/39 (38.5% of) scans were negative and 6/39 (15.4%) had equivocal results. 12/22 (54.5% of) patients had a change in their treatment plan post-PSMA PET scan while 10/22 (45.5%) had no change in their treatment plan. In the BCR cohort, 93/150 (62.0%) had a local recurrence or metastatic lesions. Equivocal and negative scans accounted for 11/150 (7.3%) and 46/150 (30.7%) of scans, respectively. 37/109 (33.9% of) patients had a change in their treatment plan, while treatment was not altered in 72/109 (66.1% of) cases. In patients with metastatic disease, 43/46 (93.5%) had PSMA-avid lesions identified; equivocal and negative scans accounted for 2/46 (4.3%) and 1/46 (2.2%) of scan results, respectively. 6/26 (23.1%) had their tentative treatment plan adjusted after the PSMA PET scan. No change in the treatment plan was observed in 20/26 (76.9% of) cases. CONCLUSION: Integration of F-18 PSMA PET imaging impacted clinical decision-making and subsequent management across all stages of prostate cancer. It remains to be seen whether this translates into superior survival outcomes.
Thomayer Hospital Charles University Prague Czech Republic
University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center Minneapolis Minnesota USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23011232
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230801132907.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/pros.24527 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36999911
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Arafa, Ali T $u University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000304603039
- 245 10
- $a Impact of piflufolastat F-18 PSMA PET imaging on clinical decision-making in prostate cancer across disease states: A retrospective review / $c AT. Arafa, A. Jain, P. Skrobanek, B. Humphrey, JW. Froelich, ES. Antonarakis
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Piflufolastat F-18 (18F-DCFPyL) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is approved by the US food and drug administration for initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and restaging of metastatic prostate cancer. Here, we sought to assess how its integration into clinical care may have impacted the management of patients. METHODS: We identified 235 consecutive patients who underwent an 18F-DCFPyL PET scan from August 2021 to June 2022. The median prostate-specific antigen at the time of imaging was 1.8 ng/mL (Range: 0-3740 ng/mL). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze its impact on clinical care for a subset of 157 patients with available treatment information: 22 for initial staging, 109 with BCR, and 26 patients with known metastatic disease. RESULTS: PSMA-avid lesions were detected in 154/235 (65.5% of) patients. In patients undergoing initial staging, 18/39 (46.2% of) patients had extra-prostatic metastatic lesions; 15/39 (38.5% of) scans were negative and 6/39 (15.4%) had equivocal results. 12/22 (54.5% of) patients had a change in their treatment plan post-PSMA PET scan while 10/22 (45.5%) had no change in their treatment plan. In the BCR cohort, 93/150 (62.0%) had a local recurrence or metastatic lesions. Equivocal and negative scans accounted for 11/150 (7.3%) and 46/150 (30.7%) of scans, respectively. 37/109 (33.9% of) patients had a change in their treatment plan, while treatment was not altered in 72/109 (66.1% of) cases. In patients with metastatic disease, 43/46 (93.5%) had PSMA-avid lesions identified; equivocal and negative scans accounted for 2/46 (4.3%) and 1/46 (2.2%) of scan results, respectively. 6/26 (23.1%) had their tentative treatment plan adjusted after the PSMA PET scan. No change in the treatment plan was observed in 20/26 (76.9% of) cases. CONCLUSION: Integration of F-18 PSMA PET imaging impacted clinical decision-making and subsequent management across all stages of prostate cancer. It remains to be seen whether this translates into superior survival outcomes.
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a PET/CT $x metody $7 D000072078
- 650 12
- $a nádory prostaty $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D011471
- 650 _2
- $a prostatický specifický antigen $7 D017430
- 650 _2
- $a pozitronová emisní tomografie $7 D049268
- 650 _2
- $a radioizotopy galia $7 D005710
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Jain, Aditya $u University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Skrobanek, Pavel $u Thomayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Humphrey, Brad $u M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center Radiotheranostics Unit, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Froelich, Jerry W $u M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center Radiotheranostics Unit, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Antonarakis, Emmanuel S $u University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000300319655
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010484 $t The Prostate $x 1097-0045 $g Roč. 83, č. 9 (2023), s. 863-870
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36999911 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230801132903 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963556 $s 1197497
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 83 $c 9 $d 863-870 $e 20230331 $i 1097-0045 $m The Prostate $n Prostate $x MED00010484
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718