Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Impact of piflufolastat F-18 PSMA PET imaging on clinical decision-making in prostate cancer across disease states: A retrospective review

AT. Arafa, A. Jain, P. Skrobanek, B. Humphrey, JW. Froelich, ES. Antonarakis

. 2023 ; 83 (9) : 863-870. [pub] 20230331

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23011232

INTRODUCTION: Piflufolastat F-18 (18F-DCFPyL) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is approved by the US food and drug administration for initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and restaging of metastatic prostate cancer. Here, we sought to assess how its integration into clinical care may have impacted the management of patients. METHODS: We identified 235 consecutive patients who underwent an 18F-DCFPyL PET scan from August 2021 to June 2022. The median prostate-specific antigen at the time of imaging was 1.8 ng/mL (Range: 0-3740 ng/mL). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze its impact on clinical care for a subset of 157 patients with available treatment information: 22 for initial staging, 109 with BCR, and 26 patients with known metastatic disease. RESULTS: PSMA-avid lesions were detected in 154/235 (65.5% of) patients. In patients undergoing initial staging, 18/39 (46.2% of) patients had extra-prostatic metastatic lesions; 15/39 (38.5% of) scans were negative and 6/39 (15.4%) had equivocal results. 12/22 (54.5% of) patients had a change in their treatment plan post-PSMA PET scan while 10/22 (45.5%) had no change in their treatment plan. In the BCR cohort, 93/150 (62.0%) had a local recurrence or metastatic lesions. Equivocal and negative scans accounted for 11/150 (7.3%) and 46/150 (30.7%) of scans, respectively. 37/109 (33.9% of) patients had a change in their treatment plan, while treatment was not altered in 72/109 (66.1% of) cases. In patients with metastatic disease, 43/46 (93.5%) had PSMA-avid lesions identified; equivocal and negative scans accounted for 2/46 (4.3%) and 1/46 (2.2%) of scan results, respectively. 6/26 (23.1%) had their tentative treatment plan adjusted after the PSMA PET scan. No change in the treatment plan was observed in 20/26 (76.9% of) cases. CONCLUSION: Integration of F-18 PSMA PET imaging impacted clinical decision-making and subsequent management across all stages of prostate cancer. It remains to be seen whether this translates into superior survival outcomes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23011232
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230801132907.0
007      
ta
008      
230718s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/pros.24527 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36999911
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Arafa, Ali T $u University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000304603039
245    10
$a Impact of piflufolastat F-18 PSMA PET imaging on clinical decision-making in prostate cancer across disease states: A retrospective review / $c AT. Arafa, A. Jain, P. Skrobanek, B. Humphrey, JW. Froelich, ES. Antonarakis
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Piflufolastat F-18 (18F-DCFPyL) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is approved by the US food and drug administration for initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and restaging of metastatic prostate cancer. Here, we sought to assess how its integration into clinical care may have impacted the management of patients. METHODS: We identified 235 consecutive patients who underwent an 18F-DCFPyL PET scan from August 2021 to June 2022. The median prostate-specific antigen at the time of imaging was 1.8 ng/mL (Range: 0-3740 ng/mL). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze its impact on clinical care for a subset of 157 patients with available treatment information: 22 for initial staging, 109 with BCR, and 26 patients with known metastatic disease. RESULTS: PSMA-avid lesions were detected in 154/235 (65.5% of) patients. In patients undergoing initial staging, 18/39 (46.2% of) patients had extra-prostatic metastatic lesions; 15/39 (38.5% of) scans were negative and 6/39 (15.4%) had equivocal results. 12/22 (54.5% of) patients had a change in their treatment plan post-PSMA PET scan while 10/22 (45.5%) had no change in their treatment plan. In the BCR cohort, 93/150 (62.0%) had a local recurrence or metastatic lesions. Equivocal and negative scans accounted for 11/150 (7.3%) and 46/150 (30.7%) of scans, respectively. 37/109 (33.9% of) patients had a change in their treatment plan, while treatment was not altered in 72/109 (66.1% of) cases. In patients with metastatic disease, 43/46 (93.5%) had PSMA-avid lesions identified; equivocal and negative scans accounted for 2/46 (4.3%) and 1/46 (2.2%) of scan results, respectively. 6/26 (23.1%) had their tentative treatment plan adjusted after the PSMA PET scan. No change in the treatment plan was observed in 20/26 (76.9% of) cases. CONCLUSION: Integration of F-18 PSMA PET imaging impacted clinical decision-making and subsequent management across all stages of prostate cancer. It remains to be seen whether this translates into superior survival outcomes.
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a PET/CT $x metody $7 D000072078
650    12
$a nádory prostaty $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D011471
650    _2
$a prostatický specifický antigen $7 D017430
650    _2
$a pozitronová emisní tomografie $7 D049268
650    _2
$a radioizotopy galia $7 D005710
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jain, Aditya $u University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
700    1_
$a Skrobanek, Pavel $u Thomayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Humphrey, Brad $u M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center Radiotheranostics Unit, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
700    1_
$a Froelich, Jerry W $u M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center Radiotheranostics Unit, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
700    1_
$a Antonarakis, Emmanuel S $u University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000300319655
773    0_
$w MED00010484 $t The Prostate $x 1097-0045 $g Roč. 83, č. 9 (2023), s. 863-870
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36999911 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230801132903 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1963556 $s 1197497
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 83 $c 9 $d 863-870 $e 20230331 $i 1097-0045 $m The Prostate $n Prostate $x MED00010484
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230718

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...