-
Something wrong with this record ?
In-vial dried urine spot collection and processing for quantitative analyses
M. Dvořák, R. Maršala, P. Kubáň
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Specimen Handling * MeSH
- Body Fluids * MeSH
- Dried Blood Spot Testing methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Analysis of dried urine spots (DUSs) is becoming an emerging technique in clinical, toxicological, and forensic chemistry due to the fully non-invasive collection, facile transportation, and simple storage of DUS samples. Correct DUS collection and elution is of the utmost importance because inadequate DUS sampling/processing may have direct consequences on quantitative DUS analyses and these aspects were, for the first time, comprehensively investigated in this contribution. Various groups of endogenous and exogenous species were selected as model analytes and their concentrations were monitored in DUSs collected on standard cellulose-based sampling cards. Strong chromatographic effects were observed for most analytes having a crucial impact on their distribution within the DUSs during sampling. Concentrations of target analytes were up to 3.75-fold higher in the central DUS sub-punch in comparison to the liquid urine. Consequently, substantially reduced concentrations of these analytes were determined in peripheral DUS sub-punches demonstrating that sub-punching, often applied to dried material spots, is not acceptable for quantitative DUS analyses. Hence, a simple, rapid, and user-friendly procedure was suggested, which employed an in-vial collection of a known urine volume on a pre-punched sampling disc (using a low-cost micropipette designed for patient-centric clinical sampling) and in-vial processing of the whole DUS. Excellent accuracy (0.20%) and precision (0.89%) of liquid transfers were achieved by the micropipette, which was also applied to remote DUS collection by laic and expert users. The resulting DUS eluates were analysed by capillary electrophoresis (CE) for the determination of endogenous urine species. The CE results demonstrated no significant differences between the two user groups, elution efficiencies of 88-100% (in comparison to the liquid urine), and precision better than 5.5%.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23011477
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230801133056.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341071 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37005033
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Dvořák, Miloš $u Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Veveří 97, CZ-60200, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a In-vial dried urine spot collection and processing for quantitative analyses / $c M. Dvořák, R. Maršala, P. Kubáň
- 520 9_
- $a Analysis of dried urine spots (DUSs) is becoming an emerging technique in clinical, toxicological, and forensic chemistry due to the fully non-invasive collection, facile transportation, and simple storage of DUS samples. Correct DUS collection and elution is of the utmost importance because inadequate DUS sampling/processing may have direct consequences on quantitative DUS analyses and these aspects were, for the first time, comprehensively investigated in this contribution. Various groups of endogenous and exogenous species were selected as model analytes and their concentrations were monitored in DUSs collected on standard cellulose-based sampling cards. Strong chromatographic effects were observed for most analytes having a crucial impact on their distribution within the DUSs during sampling. Concentrations of target analytes were up to 3.75-fold higher in the central DUS sub-punch in comparison to the liquid urine. Consequently, substantially reduced concentrations of these analytes were determined in peripheral DUS sub-punches demonstrating that sub-punching, often applied to dried material spots, is not acceptable for quantitative DUS analyses. Hence, a simple, rapid, and user-friendly procedure was suggested, which employed an in-vial collection of a known urine volume on a pre-punched sampling disc (using a low-cost micropipette designed for patient-centric clinical sampling) and in-vial processing of the whole DUS. Excellent accuracy (0.20%) and precision (0.89%) of liquid transfers were achieved by the micropipette, which was also applied to remote DUS collection by laic and expert users. The resulting DUS eluates were analysed by capillary electrophoresis (CE) for the determination of endogenous urine species. The CE results demonstrated no significant differences between the two user groups, elution efficiencies of 88-100% (in comparison to the liquid urine), and precision better than 5.5%.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a odběr biologického vzorku $7 D013048
- 650 12
- $a tělesné tekutiny $7 D001826
- 650 _2
- $a test suché kapky krve $x metody $7 D059788
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Maršala, Richard $u Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kubáň, Pavel $u Institute of Analytical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Veveří 97, CZ-60200, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kuban@iach.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000332 $t Analytica chimica acta $x 1873-4324 $g Roč. 1254, č. - (2023), s. 341071
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37005033 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230801133053 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963721 $s 1197742
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 1254 $c - $d 341071 $e 20230311 $i 1873-4324 $m Analytica chimica acta $n Anal. chim. acta (Print) $x MED00000332
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718