-
Something wrong with this record ?
GEospatial aNalysis of ExtRacorporeal membrane oxygenATion in Europe (GENERATE)
S. Gillon, C. Zheng, Z. Feng, M. Fleig, T. Scquizzato, J. Belohlavek, R. Lorusso, N. Lone, J. Swol
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation * MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
INTRODUCTION: A cross-sectional survey GENERATE (GEospatial aNalysis of ExtRacorporeal membrane oxygenATion in Europe) initiated on behalf of the European chapter of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (EuroELSO), aims to provide a systematic, detailed description of contemporary Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) provision in Europe, map the spatial distribution of ECLS centers, and the accessibility of ECLS. METHODS: Structured data collection forms were used to create a narrative description of ECLS provision in EuroELSO affiliated countries. This consisted of both center-specific data and relevant national infrastructure. Data was provided by a network of local and national representatives. Spatial accessibility analysis was conducted where appropriate geographical data were available. RESULTS: 281 centers from 37 countries affiliated to EuroELSO were included in the geospatial analysis and demonstrate heterogeneous patterns of ECLS provision. Accessibility of ECLS services within 1 hour of drive-time is available for 50% of the adult population in 8 of 37 countries (21.6%). This proportion is reached within 2 hours in 21 of 37 countries (56.8%) and within 3 hours in 24 of 37 countries (64.9%). For pediatric centers, accessibility is similar with 9 of 37 countries (24.3%) reached the covering of 50% of the population aged 0-14 within 1 hour and 23 of 37 countries (62.2%) within 2 hours and 3 hours. CONCLUSIONS: ECLS services are accessible in most of the European countries, but their provision differs across the continent. There is still no solid evidence given regarding the optimal ECLS provision model. The spatial disparity in ECLS provision demonstrated in our analysis requires governments, healthcare professionals and policy makers to consider how to develop existing provision to accommodate the anticipated increase in need for time critical access to this advanced support modality.
2nd Department of Internal Cardiovascular Medicine General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht Maastricht The Netherlands
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
Department of Critical Care Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Little France Crescent Edinburgh UK
Department of Respiratory Medicine Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg Germany
Institute of Geography School of Geosciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23011583
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230801133147.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/02676591231160471 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36879353
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Gillon, Stuart $u Department of Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
- 245 10
- $a GEospatial aNalysis of ExtRacorporeal membrane oxygenATion in Europe (GENERATE) / $c S. Gillon, C. Zheng, Z. Feng, M. Fleig, T. Scquizzato, J. Belohlavek, R. Lorusso, N. Lone, J. Swol
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: A cross-sectional survey GENERATE (GEospatial aNalysis of ExtRacorporeal membrane oxygenATion in Europe) initiated on behalf of the European chapter of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (EuroELSO), aims to provide a systematic, detailed description of contemporary Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) provision in Europe, map the spatial distribution of ECLS centers, and the accessibility of ECLS. METHODS: Structured data collection forms were used to create a narrative description of ECLS provision in EuroELSO affiliated countries. This consisted of both center-specific data and relevant national infrastructure. Data was provided by a network of local and national representatives. Spatial accessibility analysis was conducted where appropriate geographical data were available. RESULTS: 281 centers from 37 countries affiliated to EuroELSO were included in the geospatial analysis and demonstrate heterogeneous patterns of ECLS provision. Accessibility of ECLS services within 1 hour of drive-time is available for 50% of the adult population in 8 of 37 countries (21.6%). This proportion is reached within 2 hours in 21 of 37 countries (56.8%) and within 3 hours in 24 of 37 countries (64.9%). For pediatric centers, accessibility is similar with 9 of 37 countries (24.3%) reached the covering of 50% of the population aged 0-14 within 1 hour and 23 of 37 countries (62.2%) within 2 hours and 3 hours. CONCLUSIONS: ECLS services are accessible in most of the European countries, but their provision differs across the continent. There is still no solid evidence given regarding the optimal ECLS provision model. The spatial disparity in ECLS provision demonstrated in our analysis requires governments, healthcare professionals and policy makers to consider how to develop existing provision to accommodate the anticipated increase in need for time critical access to this advanced support modality.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a mimotělní membránová oxygenace $7 D015199
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Zheng, Chunyu $u Institute of Geography, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Feng, Zhiqiang $u Institute of Geography, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Fleig, Marcel $u Department of Respiratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000208317884
- 700 1_
- $a Scquizzato, Tommaso $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Belohlavek, Jan $u 2nd Department of Internal Cardiovascular Medicine, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lorusso, Roberto $u ECLS Center, Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Center, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands $u Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000217772045
- 700 1_
- $a Lone, Nazir $u Department of Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK $u Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Swol, Justyna $u Department of Respiratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/000000022903092X
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003752 $t Perfusion $x 1477-111X $g Roč. 38, č. 1_suppl (2023), s. 24-39
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36879353 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230801133143 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963797 $s 1197848
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 38 $c 1_suppl $d 24-39 $e 20230306 $i 1477-111X $m Perfusion $n Perfusion $x MED00003752
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718