-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comprehensive analysis of scientific output in hip and knee arthroscopy [Komplexní analýza vědeckých výstupů artroskopie kyčle a kolena]
MA. Wolf, D. Millenaar, P. Winter, F. Mahfoud, S. Landgraeber
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37690036
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- artroskopie * MeSH
- dolní končetina * MeSH
- kolenní kloub MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY A global bibliometric comparison of the level of scientific interest and output in the two research areas hip and knee arthroscopy (H-ASC and K-ASC) was carried out. In addition, the different degrees of publication activity in the countries and institutes performing this research were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Publications from 1945-2020 listed in the Web of Science Core Collection were included in the study. Using the web application Science Performance Evaluation (SciPE), quantitative and qualitative aspects were evaluated. Subsequently, the date of publication, author information, and other metadata were analysed. RESULTS Since 1945, 3,924 studies have been published on K-ASC and 2,163 on H-ASC. The majority of the publications which have appeared since 2016 dealt with the topic of H-ASC (H-ASC: 241.2 publications/year; K-ASC: 217.4 publications/year). The USA published the most on both topics (H-ASC: 1,123 publications; K-ASC: 1,078 publications). More countries and institutes participated in K-ASC (3,008 institutes, 82 countries) than in H-ASC (103 institutes, 57 countries). The ten institutes with the most publications accounted for 36.71% and 12.34% of all publications on H-ASC and K-ASC, respectively. H-ASC received 78.12% of its funding from private sponsors while K-ASC was supported mainly by governmental/nonprofit sponsors (70.92%). CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first scientific comparison between H-ASC and K-ASC. Measured by qualitative and quantitative aspects, K-ASC was the most flourishing research area overall. In the last ten to five years, interest has shifted towards HASC with an increasing number of publications and a higher rate of citations. Key words: knee arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy, bibliometric comparison.
Department of Internal Medicine 3 University of Saarland Homburg Germany
Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery University of Saarland Homburg Germany
Komplexní analýza vědeckých výstupů artroskopie kyčle a kolena
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23014716
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231017102638.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231005s2023 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2023/028
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37690036
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Wolf, Milan Anton $u Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
- 245 10
- $a Comprehensive analysis of scientific output in hip and knee arthroscopy / $c MA. Wolf, D. Millenaar, P. Winter, F. Mahfoud, S. Landgraeber
- 246 31
- $a Komplexní analýza vědeckých výstupů artroskopie kyčle a kolena
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY A global bibliometric comparison of the level of scientific interest and output in the two research areas hip and knee arthroscopy (H-ASC and K-ASC) was carried out. In addition, the different degrees of publication activity in the countries and institutes performing this research were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Publications from 1945-2020 listed in the Web of Science Core Collection were included in the study. Using the web application Science Performance Evaluation (SciPE), quantitative and qualitative aspects were evaluated. Subsequently, the date of publication, author information, and other metadata were analysed. RESULTS Since 1945, 3,924 studies have been published on K-ASC and 2,163 on H-ASC. The majority of the publications which have appeared since 2016 dealt with the topic of H-ASC (H-ASC: 241.2 publications/year; K-ASC: 217.4 publications/year). The USA published the most on both topics (H-ASC: 1,123 publications; K-ASC: 1,078 publications). More countries and institutes participated in K-ASC (3,008 institutes, 82 countries) than in H-ASC (103 institutes, 57 countries). The ten institutes with the most publications accounted for 36.71% and 12.34% of all publications on H-ASC and K-ASC, respectively. H-ASC received 78.12% of its funding from private sponsors while K-ASC was supported mainly by governmental/nonprofit sponsors (70.92%). CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first scientific comparison between H-ASC and K-ASC. Measured by qualitative and quantitative aspects, K-ASC was the most flourishing research area overall. In the last ten to five years, interest has shifted towards HASC with an increasing number of publications and a higher rate of citations. Key words: knee arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy, bibliometric comparison.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a artroskopie $7 D001182
- 650 12
- $a dolní končetina $7 D035002
- 650 _2
- $a kolenní kloub $7 D007719
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Millenaar, D. $u Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Winter, P. $u Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Mahfoud, F. $u Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Landgraeber, S. $u Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 90, č. 4 (2023), s. 233-238
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37690036 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231017102635 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1995493 $s 1201051
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 90 $c 4 $d 233-238 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20231005