Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comprehensive analysis of scientific output in hip and knee arthroscopy [Komplexní analýza vědeckých výstupů artroskopie kyčle a kolena]

MA. Wolf, D. Millenaar, P. Winter, F. Mahfoud, S. Landgraeber

. 2023 ; 90 (4) : 233-238. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23014716

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2006

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY A global bibliometric comparison of the level of scientific interest and output in the two research areas hip and knee arthroscopy (H-ASC and K-ASC) was carried out. In addition, the different degrees of publication activity in the countries and institutes performing this research were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Publications from 1945-2020 listed in the Web of Science Core Collection were included in the study. Using the web application Science Performance Evaluation (SciPE), quantitative and qualitative aspects were evaluated. Subsequently, the date of publication, author information, and other metadata were analysed. RESULTS Since 1945, 3,924 studies have been published on K-ASC and 2,163 on H-ASC. The majority of the publications which have appeared since 2016 dealt with the topic of H-ASC (H-ASC: 241.2 publications/year; K-ASC: 217.4 publications/year). The USA published the most on both topics (H-ASC: 1,123 publications; K-ASC: 1,078 publications). More countries and institutes participated in K-ASC (3,008 institutes, 82 countries) than in H-ASC (103 institutes, 57 countries). The ten institutes with the most publications accounted for 36.71% and 12.34% of all publications on H-ASC and K-ASC, respectively. H-ASC received 78.12% of its funding from private sponsors while K-ASC was supported mainly by governmental/nonprofit sponsors (70.92%). CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first scientific comparison between H-ASC and K-ASC. Measured by qualitative and quantitative aspects, K-ASC was the most flourishing research area overall. In the last ten to five years, interest has shifted towards HASC with an increasing number of publications and a higher rate of citations. Key words: knee arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy, bibliometric comparison.

Komplexní analýza vědeckých výstupů artroskopie kyčle a kolena

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23014716
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231017102638.0
007      
ta
008      
231005s2023 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2023/028
035    __
$a (PubMed)37690036
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Wolf, Milan Anton $u Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
245    10
$a Comprehensive analysis of scientific output in hip and knee arthroscopy / $c MA. Wolf, D. Millenaar, P. Winter, F. Mahfoud, S. Landgraeber
246    31
$a Komplexní analýza vědeckých výstupů artroskopie kyčle a kolena
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY A global bibliometric comparison of the level of scientific interest and output in the two research areas hip and knee arthroscopy (H-ASC and K-ASC) was carried out. In addition, the different degrees of publication activity in the countries and institutes performing this research were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Publications from 1945-2020 listed in the Web of Science Core Collection were included in the study. Using the web application Science Performance Evaluation (SciPE), quantitative and qualitative aspects were evaluated. Subsequently, the date of publication, author information, and other metadata were analysed. RESULTS Since 1945, 3,924 studies have been published on K-ASC and 2,163 on H-ASC. The majority of the publications which have appeared since 2016 dealt with the topic of H-ASC (H-ASC: 241.2 publications/year; K-ASC: 217.4 publications/year). The USA published the most on both topics (H-ASC: 1,123 publications; K-ASC: 1,078 publications). More countries and institutes participated in K-ASC (3,008 institutes, 82 countries) than in H-ASC (103 institutes, 57 countries). The ten institutes with the most publications accounted for 36.71% and 12.34% of all publications on H-ASC and K-ASC, respectively. H-ASC received 78.12% of its funding from private sponsors while K-ASC was supported mainly by governmental/nonprofit sponsors (70.92%). CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first scientific comparison between H-ASC and K-ASC. Measured by qualitative and quantitative aspects, K-ASC was the most flourishing research area overall. In the last ten to five years, interest has shifted towards HASC with an increasing number of publications and a higher rate of citations. Key words: knee arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy, bibliometric comparison.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a artroskopie $7 D001182
650    12
$a dolní končetina $7 D035002
650    _2
$a kolenní kloub $7 D007719
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Millenaar, D. $u Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Winter, P. $u Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Mahfoud, F. $u Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Landgraeber, S. $u Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 90, č. 4 (2023), s. 233-238
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37690036 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20231005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231017102635 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1995493 $s 1201051
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 90 $c 4 $d 233-238 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20231005

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...