-
Something wrong with this record ?
Timing of Early Salvage Therapy for Patients With Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Carcinoma
S. Argalácsová, M. Vočka, O. Čapoun, L. Lambert
Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article, Review
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2012
PubMed Central
from 2012
Europe PubMed Central
from 2012
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2007
PubMed
37771544
DOI
10.3389/or.2023.10676
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Between 25% and 33% of patients after radical prostatectomy experience a relapse of the disease. The risk of relapse increases in patients with risk factors up to 50%-80%. For a long time, adjuvant radiotherapy has been considered the standard of care. Four large prospective trials, that compared adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical relapse, showed the superiority of the adjuvant approach in biochemical and local relapse-free survival, but no consistent benefit in long-term endpoints (i.e., metastasis-free survival, overall survival, or carcinoma-specific survival) at the expense of increased urinary and bowel toxicity. Three large international studies comparing adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy paved the way toward early salvage radiotherapy. However, the optimal threshold of the PSA level (range of 0.2-0.5 ng/mL) for initiating early salvage radiotherapy remains unresolved and still poses a challenge in everyday clinical practice when balancing the need for early radiotherapy and the associated toxicity. Imprecise stratification of biochemical relaps patients according to the risk of clinical relapse drives efforts to find additional molecular biomarkers that would improve the timing of the salvage therapy.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23015272
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231020093559.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231010s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/or.2023.10676 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37771544
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Argalácsová, Soňa $u Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Timing of Early Salvage Therapy for Patients With Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Carcinoma / $c S. Argalácsová, M. Vočka, O. Čapoun, L. Lambert
- 520 9_
- $a Between 25% and 33% of patients after radical prostatectomy experience a relapse of the disease. The risk of relapse increases in patients with risk factors up to 50%-80%. For a long time, adjuvant radiotherapy has been considered the standard of care. Four large prospective trials, that compared adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical relapse, showed the superiority of the adjuvant approach in biochemical and local relapse-free survival, but no consistent benefit in long-term endpoints (i.e., metastasis-free survival, overall survival, or carcinoma-specific survival) at the expense of increased urinary and bowel toxicity. Three large international studies comparing adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy paved the way toward early salvage radiotherapy. However, the optimal threshold of the PSA level (range of 0.2-0.5 ng/mL) for initiating early salvage radiotherapy remains unresolved and still poses a challenge in everyday clinical practice when balancing the need for early radiotherapy and the associated toxicity. Imprecise stratification of biochemical relaps patients according to the risk of clinical relapse drives efforts to find additional molecular biomarkers that would improve the timing of the salvage therapy.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Vočka, Michal $u Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Čapoun, Otakar $u Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Lambert, Lukáš $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00196739 $t Oncology reviews $x 1970-5565 $g Roč. 17, č. - (2023), s. 10676
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37771544 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231010 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231020093552 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1997076 $s 1201634
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 17 $c - $d 10676 $e 20230913 $i 1970-5565 $m Oncology reviews $n Oncol Rev $x MED00196739
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231010