• Something wrong with this record ?

Timing of Early Salvage Therapy for Patients With Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Carcinoma

S. Argalácsová, M. Vočka, O. Čapoun, L. Lambert

. 2023 ; 17 (-) : 10676. [pub] 20230913

Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article, Review

Between 25% and 33% of patients after radical prostatectomy experience a relapse of the disease. The risk of relapse increases in patients with risk factors up to 50%-80%. For a long time, adjuvant radiotherapy has been considered the standard of care. Four large prospective trials, that compared adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical relapse, showed the superiority of the adjuvant approach in biochemical and local relapse-free survival, but no consistent benefit in long-term endpoints (i.e., metastasis-free survival, overall survival, or carcinoma-specific survival) at the expense of increased urinary and bowel toxicity. Three large international studies comparing adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy paved the way toward early salvage radiotherapy. However, the optimal threshold of the PSA level (range of 0.2-0.5 ng/mL) for initiating early salvage radiotherapy remains unresolved and still poses a challenge in everyday clinical practice when balancing the need for early radiotherapy and the associated toxicity. Imprecise stratification of biochemical relaps patients according to the risk of clinical relapse drives efforts to find additional molecular biomarkers that would improve the timing of the salvage therapy.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23015272
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231020093559.0
007      
ta
008      
231010s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/or.2023.10676 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37771544
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Argalácsová, Soňa $u Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
245    10
$a Timing of Early Salvage Therapy for Patients With Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Carcinoma / $c S. Argalácsová, M. Vočka, O. Čapoun, L. Lambert
520    9_
$a Between 25% and 33% of patients after radical prostatectomy experience a relapse of the disease. The risk of relapse increases in patients with risk factors up to 50%-80%. For a long time, adjuvant radiotherapy has been considered the standard of care. Four large prospective trials, that compared adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical relapse, showed the superiority of the adjuvant approach in biochemical and local relapse-free survival, but no consistent benefit in long-term endpoints (i.e., metastasis-free survival, overall survival, or carcinoma-specific survival) at the expense of increased urinary and bowel toxicity. Three large international studies comparing adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy paved the way toward early salvage radiotherapy. However, the optimal threshold of the PSA level (range of 0.2-0.5 ng/mL) for initiating early salvage radiotherapy remains unresolved and still poses a challenge in everyday clinical practice when balancing the need for early radiotherapy and the associated toxicity. Imprecise stratification of biochemical relaps patients according to the risk of clinical relapse drives efforts to find additional molecular biomarkers that would improve the timing of the salvage therapy.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Vočka, Michal $u Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Čapoun, Otakar $u Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Lambert, Lukáš $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00196739 $t Oncology reviews $x 1970-5565 $g Roč. 17, č. - (2023), s. 10676
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37771544 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231010 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231020093552 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1997076 $s 1201634
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 17 $c - $d 10676 $e 20230913 $i 1970-5565 $m Oncology reviews $n Oncol Rev $x MED00196739
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231010

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...