-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effect of Footwear Type on Biomechanical Risk Factors for Knee Osteoarthritis
J. Malus, J. Urbaczka, M. Rygelova, V. Casula, M. Nieminen, A. Monte, V. Horka, J. Uchytil
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2013
Free Medical Journals
od 2013
PubMed Central
od 2013
Europe PubMed Central
od 2013
ProQuest Central
od 2013-04-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-04-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2013-04-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2013-04-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2013
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Regular walking in different types of footwear may increase the mediolateral shear force, knee adduction moment, or vertical ground-reaction forces that could increase the risk of early development of knee osteoarthritis (OA). PURPOSE: To compare kinematic and kinetic parameters that could affect the development of knee OA in 3 footwear conditions. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 40 asymptomatic participants performed walking trials in the laboratory at self-selected walking speeds under barefoot (BF), minimalistic (MF), and neutral (NF) footwear conditions. Knee joint parameters were described using discrete point values, and continuous curves were evaluated using statistical parametric mapping. A 3 × 1 repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the main effect of footwear for both discrete and continuous data. To compare differences between footwear conditions, a post hoc paired t test was used. RESULTS: Discrete point analyses showed a significantly greater knee power in NF compared with MF and BF in the weight absorption phase (P < .001 for both). Statistical parametric mapping analysis indicated a significantly greater knee angle in the sagittal plane at the end of the propulsive phase in BF compared with NF and MF (P = .043). Knee joint moment was significantly greater in the propulsive phase for the sagittal (P = .038) and frontal planes (P = .035) in BF compared with NF and MF and in the absorption phase in the sagittal plane (P = .034) in BF compared with MF and NF. A significant main effect of footwear was found for anteroposterior (propulsion, ↑MF, NF, ↓BF [P = .008]; absorption, ↑BF, MF, ↓NF [P = .001]), mediolateral (propulsion, ↑MF, NF, ↓BF [P = .005]; absorption, ↑NF, MF, ↓BF [P = .044]), and vertical (propulsion, ↑NF, BF, ↓MF [P = .001]; absorption, ↑MF, BF, ↓NF [P < .001]) ground-reaction forces. Knee power showed a significant main effect of footwear (absorption, ↑NF, MF, ↓BF [P = .015]; propulsion, ↑MF, NF, ↓BF [P = .039]). CONCLUSION: Walking in MF without sufficient accommodation affected kinetic and kinematic parameters and could increase the risk of early development of knee OA.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology Oulu University Hospital Oulu Finland
Department of Neurosciences Biomedicine and Movement Sciences University of Verona Verona Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23015678
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231020093559.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231010s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/23259671231183416 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37560612
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Malus, Jan $u Human Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Effect of Footwear Type on Biomechanical Risk Factors for Knee Osteoarthritis / $c J. Malus, J. Urbaczka, M. Rygelova, V. Casula, M. Nieminen, A. Monte, V. Horka, J. Uchytil
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Regular walking in different types of footwear may increase the mediolateral shear force, knee adduction moment, or vertical ground-reaction forces that could increase the risk of early development of knee osteoarthritis (OA). PURPOSE: To compare kinematic and kinetic parameters that could affect the development of knee OA in 3 footwear conditions. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 40 asymptomatic participants performed walking trials in the laboratory at self-selected walking speeds under barefoot (BF), minimalistic (MF), and neutral (NF) footwear conditions. Knee joint parameters were described using discrete point values, and continuous curves were evaluated using statistical parametric mapping. A 3 × 1 repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the main effect of footwear for both discrete and continuous data. To compare differences between footwear conditions, a post hoc paired t test was used. RESULTS: Discrete point analyses showed a significantly greater knee power in NF compared with MF and BF in the weight absorption phase (P < .001 for both). Statistical parametric mapping analysis indicated a significantly greater knee angle in the sagittal plane at the end of the propulsive phase in BF compared with NF and MF (P = .043). Knee joint moment was significantly greater in the propulsive phase for the sagittal (P = .038) and frontal planes (P = .035) in BF compared with NF and MF and in the absorption phase in the sagittal plane (P = .034) in BF compared with MF and NF. A significant main effect of footwear was found for anteroposterior (propulsion, ↑MF, NF, ↓BF [P = .008]; absorption, ↑BF, MF, ↓NF [P = .001]), mediolateral (propulsion, ↑MF, NF, ↓BF [P = .005]; absorption, ↑NF, MF, ↓BF [P = .044]), and vertical (propulsion, ↑NF, BF, ↓MF [P = .001]; absorption, ↑MF, BF, ↓NF [P < .001]) ground-reaction forces. Knee power showed a significant main effect of footwear (absorption, ↑NF, MF, ↓BF [P = .015]; propulsion, ↑MF, NF, ↓BF [P = .039]). CONCLUSION: Walking in MF without sufficient accommodation affected kinetic and kinematic parameters and could increase the risk of early development of knee OA.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Urbaczka, Jan $u Human Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rygelova, Marketa $u Human Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Casula, Victor $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
- 700 1_
- $a Nieminen, Miika $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
- 700 1_
- $a Monte, Andrea $u Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Horka, Veronika $u Human Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Uchytil, Jaroslav $u Human Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00196740 $t Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine $x 2325-9671 $g Roč. 11, č. 7 (2023), s. 23259671231183416
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37560612 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231010 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231020093553 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1997221 $s 1202040
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 11 $c 7 $d 23259671231183416 $e 20230720 $i 2325-9671 $m Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine $n Orthop J Sports Med $x MED00196740
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231010