Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights

WT. Wu, K. Mezian, O. Naňka, LR. Chen, V. Ricci, CP. Lin, KV. Chang, L. Özçakar

. 2023 ; 14 (1) : 116. [pub] 20230703

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23015797

Grantová podpora
MOST 106-2314-B-002-180-MY3 Ministry of Science and Technology
109-2314-B-002-114-MY3 Ministry of Science and Technology
109-2314-B-002-127 Ministry of Science and Technology
110-2314-B-002-069 Ministry of Science and Technology
111-2314-B-002-161 Ministry of Science and Technology

OBJECTIVES: Low back pain is a prevalent public health issue caused by superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment. This study aimed to explore the course of SCN branches, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerves, and effects of ultrasound-guided SCN hydrodissection. METHODS: SCN distance relative to the posterior superior iliac spines was measured and compared with ultrasound findings in asymptomatic volunteers. The CSA of the SCN, pressure-pain threshold, and pain measurements were obtained from asymptomatic controls and patients with SCN entrapment at various time points after hydrodissection (with 1 mL of 50% dextrose, 4 mL of 1% lidocaine, and 5 mL of 1% normal saline) in the short-axis view. RESULTS: Twenty sides of 10 formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected. The SCN locations on the iliac crest did not differ from the ultrasound findings in 30 asymptomatic volunteers. The average CSA of the SCN across different branches and sites ranged between 4.69-5.67 mm2 and did not vary across different segments/branches or pain statuses. Initial treatment success was observed in 77.7% (n = 28) of 36 patients receiving hydrodissection due to SCN entrapment. A group with initial treatment success experienced symptom recurrence in 25% (n = 7) of cases, and those with recurrent pain had a higher prevalence of scoliosis than those without symptom recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography effectively localizes SCN branches on the iliac crest, whereby increased nerve CSA is not useful for diagnosis. Most patients benefit from ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection; however, those with scoliosis may experience symptom recurrence and whether structured rehabilitation can reduce recurrence post-injection should be considered as one perspective in future research. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04478344). Registered on 20 July 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04478344?cond=Superior+Cluneal+Nerve&cntry=TW&draw=2&rank=1 . Critical relevance statement Ultrasound imaging accurately locates SCN branches on the iliac crest, while enlargement of the CSA is not useful in diagnosing SCN entrapment; however, approximately 80% of SCN entrapment cases respond positively to ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23015797
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231020093511.0
007      
ta
008      
231010s2023 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13244-023-01463-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37395948
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Wu, Wei-Ting $u Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, No. 87, Nei-Jiang Rd., Wan-Hwa District, Taipei, Taiwan $u Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
245    10
$a Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights / $c WT. Wu, K. Mezian, O. Naňka, LR. Chen, V. Ricci, CP. Lin, KV. Chang, L. Özçakar
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: Low back pain is a prevalent public health issue caused by superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment. This study aimed to explore the course of SCN branches, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerves, and effects of ultrasound-guided SCN hydrodissection. METHODS: SCN distance relative to the posterior superior iliac spines was measured and compared with ultrasound findings in asymptomatic volunteers. The CSA of the SCN, pressure-pain threshold, and pain measurements were obtained from asymptomatic controls and patients with SCN entrapment at various time points after hydrodissection (with 1 mL of 50% dextrose, 4 mL of 1% lidocaine, and 5 mL of 1% normal saline) in the short-axis view. RESULTS: Twenty sides of 10 formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected. The SCN locations on the iliac crest did not differ from the ultrasound findings in 30 asymptomatic volunteers. The average CSA of the SCN across different branches and sites ranged between 4.69-5.67 mm2 and did not vary across different segments/branches or pain statuses. Initial treatment success was observed in 77.7% (n = 28) of 36 patients receiving hydrodissection due to SCN entrapment. A group with initial treatment success experienced symptom recurrence in 25% (n = 7) of cases, and those with recurrent pain had a higher prevalence of scoliosis than those without symptom recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography effectively localizes SCN branches on the iliac crest, whereby increased nerve CSA is not useful for diagnosis. Most patients benefit from ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection; however, those with scoliosis may experience symptom recurrence and whether structured rehabilitation can reduce recurrence post-injection should be considered as one perspective in future research. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04478344). Registered on 20 July 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04478344?cond=Superior+Cluneal+Nerve&cntry=TW&draw=2&rank=1 . Critical relevance statement Ultrasound imaging accurately locates SCN branches on the iliac crest, while enlargement of the CSA is not useful in diagnosing SCN entrapment; however, approximately 80% of SCN entrapment cases respond positively to ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mezian, Kamal $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Naňka, Ondřej $u Institute of Anatomy, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chen, Lan-Rong $u Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, No. 87, Nei-Jiang Rd., Wan-Hwa District, Taipei, Taiwan
700    1_
$a Ricci, Vincenzo $u Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Lin, Chih-Peng $u Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
700    1_
$a Chang, Ke-Vin $u Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, No. 87, Nei-Jiang Rd., Wan-Hwa District, Taipei, Taiwan. kvchang011@gmail.com $u Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. kvchang011@gmail.com $u Center for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Wang-Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. kvchang011@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0000000275585651
700    1_
$a Özçakar, Levent $u Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
773    0_
$w MED00181719 $t Insights into imaging $x 1869-4101 $g Roč. 14, č. 1 (2023), s. 116
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37395948 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231010 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231020093505 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1997270 $s 1202159
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 14 $c 1 $d 116 $e 20230703 $i 1869-4101 $m Insights into imaging $n Insights Imaging $x MED00181719
GRA    __
$a MOST 106-2314-B-002-180-MY3 $p Ministry of Science and Technology
GRA    __
$a 109-2314-B-002-114-MY3 $p Ministry of Science and Technology
GRA    __
$a 109-2314-B-002-127 $p Ministry of Science and Technology
GRA    __
$a 110-2314-B-002-069 $p Ministry of Science and Technology
GRA    __
$a 111-2314-B-002-161 $p Ministry of Science and Technology
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231010

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...