Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection

J. Lesensky, AC. Belzarena, M. Daniel

. 2023 ; 21 (1) : 295. [pub] 20230918

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Approximately, one-third of patients with tumors of proximal humerus will require an extra-articular resection to achieve oncologic margins. This procedure yields poor functional outcomes with a considerable rate of revisions. Unconstrained implants are prone to instability hindering also function of the elbow and hand, whereas constrained shoulder reconstructions suffer from early aseptic loosening of the glenoid component due to bone overload. The purpose of this study was to develop a constrained implant suitable for extra-articular resection with loss of function in deltoid and rotator cuff, which would provide both stability and passive motion, whilst also decreasing the risk of aseptic loosening of the glenoid component. METHODS: In cooperation with Czech Technical University in Prague, we devised an implant consisting of two constrained joints in series connected by a dumbbell piece. The biomechanical analysis showed a reduction of load transfer to the glenoid component with a torque of 8.6 Nm capable of generating an 865-N pulling force on bone screw to just 0.07 Nm, hence shielding the glenoid component from undesired forces and decreasing the risk of aseptic loosening. Three patients with extra-articular resection with a total loss of function of both rotator cuff and deltoid muscle received this type of reconstruction. The average follow-up was 16 months. RESULTS: The surgical technique is straightforward. The surgery took 175 min on average with average blood loss of 516 ml. There were no surgical- or implant-related complications. All three patients were pain-free and had a stable shoulder joint after the reconstruction. All had fully functional elbow, wrist, and hand joints. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 21/30 (70%). All patients were pleased with the results. CONCLUSION: The presented innovative implant design has demonstrated to be a promising alternative for reconstruction in these challenging cases.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016219
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026110148.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12957-023-03173-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37723520
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Lesensky, Jan $u Department of Orthopaedics, First Medical Faculty, University Hospital Na Bulovce, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. janless@gmail.com
245    10
$a Reconstruction with a double-constrained implant design after complex shoulder extra-articular resection / $c J. Lesensky, AC. Belzarena, M. Daniel
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Approximately, one-third of patients with tumors of proximal humerus will require an extra-articular resection to achieve oncologic margins. This procedure yields poor functional outcomes with a considerable rate of revisions. Unconstrained implants are prone to instability hindering also function of the elbow and hand, whereas constrained shoulder reconstructions suffer from early aseptic loosening of the glenoid component due to bone overload. The purpose of this study was to develop a constrained implant suitable for extra-articular resection with loss of function in deltoid and rotator cuff, which would provide both stability and passive motion, whilst also decreasing the risk of aseptic loosening of the glenoid component. METHODS: In cooperation with Czech Technical University in Prague, we devised an implant consisting of two constrained joints in series connected by a dumbbell piece. The biomechanical analysis showed a reduction of load transfer to the glenoid component with a torque of 8.6 Nm capable of generating an 865-N pulling force on bone screw to just 0.07 Nm, hence shielding the glenoid component from undesired forces and decreasing the risk of aseptic loosening. Three patients with extra-articular resection with a total loss of function of both rotator cuff and deltoid muscle received this type of reconstruction. The average follow-up was 16 months. RESULTS: The surgical technique is straightforward. The surgery took 175 min on average with average blood loss of 516 ml. There were no surgical- or implant-related complications. All three patients were pain-free and had a stable shoulder joint after the reconstruction. All had fully functional elbow, wrist, and hand joints. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 21/30 (70%). All patients were pleased with the results. CONCLUSION: The presented innovative implant design has demonstrated to be a promising alternative for reconstruction in these challenging cases.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a rameno $7 D012782
650    _2
$a lopatka $7 D012540
650    12
$a zákroky plastické chirurgie $7 D019651
650    12
$a ramenní kloub $x chirurgie $7 D012785
650    _2
$a humerus $7 D006811
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x etiologie $7 D011183
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Belzarena, Ana C $u Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA
700    1_
$a Daniel, Matej $u Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics, and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00008253 $t World journal of surgical oncology $x 1477-7819 $g Roč. 21, č. 1 (2023), s. 295
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37723520 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026110142 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000003 $s 1202581
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 21 $c 1 $d 295 $e 20230918 $i 1477-7819 $m World journal of surgical oncology $n World J Surg Oncol $x MED00008253
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...