-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with five different adhesive systems: in vitro study
N. Masarykova, E. Tkadlec, Z. Chlup, J. Vrbsky, A. Brysova, P. Cernochova, L. Izakovicova Holla
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 2001
PubMed Central
from 2001
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Orthodontic Brackets * MeSH
- Glass Ionomer Cements MeSH
- Research Design MeSH
- Dental Caries * MeSH
- Dental Enamel MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Orthodontic treatment is associated with numerous adverse side effects, such as enamel discoloration, demineralization or even caries. The presence of microleakage between the enamel and the adhesive and between the adhesive and the base of the orthodontic bracket allows penetration of the bacteria, molecules, and liquids into the enamel and can lead to unpleasant "white spot lesions" or secondary caries beneath and around the brackets. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate microleakage in five adhesive systems commonly used in orthodontic practice for bonding brackets. METHODS: One hundred extracted premolars were divided into five groups of twenty teeth. Stainless steel Legend medium metal brackets were bonded to teeth using five adhesive systems: resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement GC Fuji Ortho LC (GCF) and composite materials Light Bond (LB), Transbond XT (TB), TrulockTM Light Activated Adhesive (TL), and GC Ortho Connect (GCO). The specimens were subjected to thermal cycling, stained with 2% methylene blue, sectioned with low-speed diamond saw Isomet and evaluated under a digital microscope. Microleakage was detected at the enamel-adhesive and adhesive-bracket interfaces from occlusal and gingival margins. Statistical analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed models with beta error distribution. RESULTS: Microleakage was observed in all materials, with GCF showing the highest amount of microleakage. Composite materials GCO, TB, and LB exhibited the lowest amount of microleakage with no statistical difference between them, while TL showed a statistically significantly higher amount of microleakage (p < 0.001). The enamel-adhesive interface had more microleakage in all composite materials (GCO, LB, TB, and TL) than the adhesive bracket-interface (p < 0.001). The highest amount of microleakage occurred in the gingival region in all materials. CONCLUSION: Composite materials showed better adhesive properties than a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement. The presence of microleakage at the enamel-adhesive interface facilitates the penetration of various substances into enamel surfaces, causing enamel demineralization and the development of dental caries.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23016278
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231101122517.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12903-023-03368-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37670283
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Masaryková, Nela $u Clinic of Stomatology, Institution Shared with St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, Brno, 656 91, Czech Republic $7 xx0308647
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with five different adhesive systems: in vitro study / $c N. Masarykova, E. Tkadlec, Z. Chlup, J. Vrbsky, A. Brysova, P. Cernochova, L. Izakovicova Holla
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Orthodontic treatment is associated with numerous adverse side effects, such as enamel discoloration, demineralization or even caries. The presence of microleakage between the enamel and the adhesive and between the adhesive and the base of the orthodontic bracket allows penetration of the bacteria, molecules, and liquids into the enamel and can lead to unpleasant "white spot lesions" or secondary caries beneath and around the brackets. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate microleakage in five adhesive systems commonly used in orthodontic practice for bonding brackets. METHODS: One hundred extracted premolars were divided into five groups of twenty teeth. Stainless steel Legend medium metal brackets were bonded to teeth using five adhesive systems: resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement GC Fuji Ortho LC (GCF) and composite materials Light Bond (LB), Transbond XT (TB), TrulockTM Light Activated Adhesive (TL), and GC Ortho Connect (GCO). The specimens were subjected to thermal cycling, stained with 2% methylene blue, sectioned with low-speed diamond saw Isomet and evaluated under a digital microscope. Microleakage was detected at the enamel-adhesive and adhesive-bracket interfaces from occlusal and gingival margins. Statistical analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed models with beta error distribution. RESULTS: Microleakage was observed in all materials, with GCF showing the highest amount of microleakage. Composite materials GCO, TB, and LB exhibited the lowest amount of microleakage with no statistical difference between them, while TL showed a statistically significantly higher amount of microleakage (p < 0.001). The enamel-adhesive interface had more microleakage in all composite materials (GCO, LB, TB, and TL) than the adhesive bracket-interface (p < 0.001). The highest amount of microleakage occurred in the gingival region in all materials. CONCLUSION: Composite materials showed better adhesive properties than a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement. The presence of microleakage at the enamel-adhesive interface facilitates the penetration of various substances into enamel surfaces, causing enamel demineralization and the development of dental caries.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a ortodontické zámky $7 D016910
- 650 12
- $a zubní kaz $7 D003731
- 650 _2
- $a výzkumný projekt $7 D012107
- 650 _2
- $a zubní sklovina $7 D003743
- 650 _2
- $a skloionomerní cementy $7 D005899
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Tkadlec, Emil $u Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, 17. listopadu 1192/12, Olomouc, 779 00, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Chlup, Zdenek $u Institute of Physics of Materials of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Žižkova 513/22, Brno, 616 00, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vrbsky, Jan $u International Clinical Research Center (ICRC), St. Anne's University Hospital, Pekařská 53, Brno, 656 91, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Brysova, Alena $u Clinic of Stomatology, Institution Shared with St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, Brno, 656 91, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Cernochova, Pavlina $u Clinic of Stomatology, Institution Shared with St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, Brno, 656 91, Czech Republic. pavlina.cernochova@fnusa.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Izakovicova Holla, Lydie $u Clinic of Stomatology, Institution Shared with St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, Brno, 656 91, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006812 $t BMC oral health $x 1472-6831 $g Roč. 23, č. 1 (2023), s. 637
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37670283 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231101122513 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2000036 $s 1202640
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 23 $c 1 $d 637 $e 20230905 $i 1472-6831 $m BMC oral health $n BMC Oral Health $x MED00006812
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231013