-
Something wrong with this record ?
Conditional survival in breast cancer up to 10 years in the Nordic countries
F. Zitricky, A. Försti, A. Hemminki, K. Hemminki
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2012
Free Medical Journals
from 2012
PubMed Central
from 2012
Europe PubMed Central
from 2012
ProQuest Central
from 2012-08-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2012-08-01
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
from 2012
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2012
PubMed
37578395
DOI
10.1002/cam4.6436
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms * epidemiology therapy MeSH
- Registries MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Denmark MeSH
- Finland MeSH
- Norway MeSH
- Scandinavian and Nordic Countries MeSH
- Sweden MeSH
BACKGROUND: Survival in breast cancer (BC) has developed favorably but late recurrences are still a problem. METHODS: We model survival data from the NORDCAN database and analyze 1-, 5-, and 10-year relative survival and 5/1- and 10/5-year conditional survival in BC from Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Norway (NO), and Sweden (SE) between 1971 and 2020. Conditional survival measures survival in those who had survived year 1 to reach year 5 (5/1), or in those who had survived year 5 to reach year 10 (10/5). RESULTS: Almost all survival metrics were best for SE but survival in all countries improved in the course of time approaching the SE levels which were 98.3% for 1-year, 92.3% for 5-year, and 87.8% for 10-year survival. Conditional 10/5-year survival, covering 5 years, was better than 5/1-year survival, covering 4 years. A contributing factor is most likely the high rate of recurrence in period 2-5 years. The difference was observed for all countries but for DK 10/5-year survival approached 1-year survival and for NO and SE 10/5-year survival was only barely better than 5/1-year survival. The explanation to this was the excellent 10/5-year survival in DK compared to SE and particularly to NO. Literature search suggested that the reason for the relatively low 10/5-year survival in NO might be stagnant survival development in old patients. CONCLUSIONS: We assume that late mortality is critically limiting survival in BC and either interference with the late metastatic process or effective treatment will be key to future improvements in BC survival.
Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine Charles University Pilsen Pilsen Czech Republic
Comprehensive Cancer Center Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
Division of Cancer Epidemiology German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
Division of Pediatric Neurooncology German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23016322
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231026110029.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231013s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/cam4.6436 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37578395
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Zitricky, Frantisek $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Conditional survival in breast cancer up to 10 years in the Nordic countries / $c F. Zitricky, A. Försti, A. Hemminki, K. Hemminki
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Survival in breast cancer (BC) has developed favorably but late recurrences are still a problem. METHODS: We model survival data from the NORDCAN database and analyze 1-, 5-, and 10-year relative survival and 5/1- and 10/5-year conditional survival in BC from Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Norway (NO), and Sweden (SE) between 1971 and 2020. Conditional survival measures survival in those who had survived year 1 to reach year 5 (5/1), or in those who had survived year 5 to reach year 10 (10/5). RESULTS: Almost all survival metrics were best for SE but survival in all countries improved in the course of time approaching the SE levels which were 98.3% for 1-year, 92.3% for 5-year, and 87.8% for 10-year survival. Conditional 10/5-year survival, covering 5 years, was better than 5/1-year survival, covering 4 years. A contributing factor is most likely the high rate of recurrence in period 2-5 years. The difference was observed for all countries but for DK 10/5-year survival approached 1-year survival and for NO and SE 10/5-year survival was only barely better than 5/1-year survival. The explanation to this was the excellent 10/5-year survival in DK compared to SE and particularly to NO. Literature search suggested that the reason for the relatively low 10/5-year survival in NO might be stagnant survival development in old patients. CONCLUSIONS: We assume that late mortality is critically limiting survival in BC and either interference with the late metastatic process or effective treatment will be key to future improvements in BC survival.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a nádory prsu $x epidemiologie $x terapie $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $7 D015996
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a registrace $7 D012042
- 651 _2
- $a Skandinávie a severské státy $x epidemiologie $7 D012537
- 651 _2
- $a Finsko $x epidemiologie $7 D005387
- 651 _2
- $a Norsko $7 D009664
- 651 _2
- $a Švédsko $x epidemiologie $7 D013548
- 651 _2
- $a Dánsko $x epidemiologie $7 D003718
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Försti, Asta $u Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany $u Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Hemminki, Akseli $u Cancer Gene Therapy Group, Translational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland $u Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000171038530
- 700 1_
- $a Hemminki, Kari $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000227693316 $7 mzk20201092711
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181704 $t Cancer medicine $x 2045-7634 $g Roč. 12, č. 17 (2023), s. 17945-17951
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37578395 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231026110024 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2000062 $s 1202684
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 12 $c 17 $d 17945-17951 $e 20230814 $i 2045-7634 $m Cancer medicine $n Cancer Med $x MED00181704
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231013