• Something wrong with this record ?

Stroke Volume Measurements by Echocardiography and Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor in Children: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

J. Fremuth, M. Huml, T. Pomahacova, J. Kobr, S. Kormunda, J. Sykora

. 2023 ; 39 (9) : 680-684. [pub] 20230722

Language English Country United States

Document type Observational Study, Journal Article

OBJECTIVES: Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output monitoring is a cornerstone of hemodynamic assessment. Noninvasive technologies are increasingly used in children. This study compared SV measurements obtained by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound techniques (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor [USCOM]), transthoracic echocardiography jugular (TTE-J), and parasternal (TTE-P) views performed by pediatric intensivists (OP-As) with limited training in cardiac sonography (20 previous examinations) and pediatric cardiologists (OP-Bs) with limited training in USCOM (30 previous examinations) in spontaneously ventilating children. METHODS: A single-center study was conducted in 37 children. Each operator obtained 3 sets of USCOM SV measurements within a period of 3 to 5 minutes, followed with TTE measurements from both apical and jugular views. The investigators were blinded to each other's results to prevent visual and auditory bias. RESULTS: Both USCOM and TTE methods were applicable in 89% of patients. The intraobserver variability of USCOM, TTE-J, and TTE-P were less than 10% in both investigators. The SV measurements by OP-As using USCOM, TTE-J, and TTE-P were 46.15 (25.48) mL, 39.45 (20.65) mL, and 33.42 (16.69) mL, respectively. The SV measurements by OP-Bs using USCOM, TTE-J, and TTE-P were 43.99 (25.24) mL, 38.91 (19.98) mL, and 37.58 (19.81) mL, respectively.The percentage error in SV with USCOM relative to TTE-J was 36% in OP-As and 37% in OP-Bs. The percentage error in SV with TTE-P was 33% relative to TTE-J in OP-As and 21% in OP-Bs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the methods are not interchangeable because SV values by USCOM are higher in comparison with the SV values obtained by TTE. Both methods have low level of intraobserver variability. The SV measurements obtained by TTE-P were significantly lower compared with the TTE-J for the operator with limited training in echocardiography. The TTE-P requires longer practice compared with the TTE-J; therefore, we recommend to prefer TTE-J to TTE-P for inexperienced operators.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016351
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026110007.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003018 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37478016
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Fremuth, Jiri $u From the Department of Pediatrics, Faculty Hospital, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Stroke Volume Measurements by Echocardiography and Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor in Children: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study / $c J. Fremuth, M. Huml, T. Pomahacova, J. Kobr, S. Kormunda, J. Sykora
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output monitoring is a cornerstone of hemodynamic assessment. Noninvasive technologies are increasingly used in children. This study compared SV measurements obtained by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound techniques (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor [USCOM]), transthoracic echocardiography jugular (TTE-J), and parasternal (TTE-P) views performed by pediatric intensivists (OP-As) with limited training in cardiac sonography (20 previous examinations) and pediatric cardiologists (OP-Bs) with limited training in USCOM (30 previous examinations) in spontaneously ventilating children. METHODS: A single-center study was conducted in 37 children. Each operator obtained 3 sets of USCOM SV measurements within a period of 3 to 5 minutes, followed with TTE measurements from both apical and jugular views. The investigators were blinded to each other's results to prevent visual and auditory bias. RESULTS: Both USCOM and TTE methods were applicable in 89% of patients. The intraobserver variability of USCOM, TTE-J, and TTE-P were less than 10% in both investigators. The SV measurements by OP-As using USCOM, TTE-J, and TTE-P were 46.15 (25.48) mL, 39.45 (20.65) mL, and 33.42 (16.69) mL, respectively. The SV measurements by OP-Bs using USCOM, TTE-J, and TTE-P were 43.99 (25.24) mL, 38.91 (19.98) mL, and 37.58 (19.81) mL, respectively.The percentage error in SV with USCOM relative to TTE-J was 36% in OP-As and 37% in OP-Bs. The percentage error in SV with TTE-P was 33% relative to TTE-J in OP-As and 21% in OP-Bs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the methods are not interchangeable because SV values by USCOM are higher in comparison with the SV values obtained by TTE. Both methods have low level of intraobserver variability. The SV measurements obtained by TTE-P were significantly lower compared with the TTE-J for the operator with limited training in echocardiography. The TTE-P requires longer practice compared with the TTE-J; therefore, we recommend to prefer TTE-J to TTE-P for inexperienced operators.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a tepový objem $7 D013318
650    12
$a ultrazvuk $7 D014465
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a minutový srdeční výdej $7 D002302
650    12
$a echokardiografie $x metody $7 D004452
650    _2
$a monitorování fyziologických funkcí $x metody $7 D008991
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Huml, Michal
700    1_
$a Pomahacova, Tereza
700    1_
$a Kobr, Jiri
700    1_
$a Kormunda, Stanislav
700    1_
$a Sykora, Josef
773    0_
$w MED00003729 $t Pediatric emergency care $x 1535-1815 $g Roč. 39, č. 9 (2023), s. 680-684
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37478016 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026110001 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000083 $s 1202713
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 39 $c 9 $d 680-684 $e 20230722 $i 1535-1815 $m Pediatric emergency care $n Pediatr Emerg Care $x MED00003729
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...