Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Validation of the accuracy of the modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale for predicting the outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

TA. Nguyen, TD. Mai, LD. Vu, CX. Dao, HM. Ngo, HB. Hoang, TA. Tran, TQ. Pham, DT. Pham, MH. Nguyen, LQ. Nguyen, PV. Dao, DN. Nguyen, HTT. Vuong, HD. Vu, DD. Nguyen, TD. Vu, DT. Nguyen, ALN. Do, CD. Nguyen, SN. Do, HT. Nguyen, CV. Nguyen, AD....

. 2023 ; 18 (8) : e0289267. [pub] 20230822

Language English Country United States

Document type Multicenter Study, Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23016528

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the prognosis of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who may be at risk of poor outcomes using grading systems is one way to make a better decision on treatment for these patients. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), WFNS, and Hunt and Hess (H&H) Grading Scales in predicting the outcomes of patients with aSAH. METHODS: From August 2019 to June 2021, we conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study on adult patients with aSAH in three central hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam. The primary outcome was the 90-day poor outcome, measured by a score of 4 (moderately severe disability) to 6 (death) on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). We calculated the areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROCs) to determine how well the grading scales could predict patient prognosis upon admission. We also used ROC curve analysis to find the best cut-off value for each scale. We compared AUROCs using Z-statistics and compared 90-day mean mRS scores among intergrades using the pairwise multiple-comparison test. Finally, we used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the 90-day poor outcome. RESULTS: Of 415 patients, 32% had a 90-day poor outcome. The modified WFNS (AUROC: 0.839 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.795-0.883]; cut-off value≥2.50; PAUROC<0.001), WFNS (AUROC: 0.837 [95% CI: 0.793-0.881]; cut-off value≥3.5; PAUROC<0.001), and H&H scales (AUROC: 0.836 [95% CI: 0.791-0.881]; cut-off value≥3.5; PAUROC<0.001) were all good at predicting patient prognosis on day 90th after ictus. However, there were no significant differences between the AUROCs of these scales. Only grades IV and V of the modified WFNS (3.75 [standard deviation, SD: 2.46] vs 5.24 [SD: 1.68], p = 0.026, respectively), WFNS (3.75 [SD: 2.46] vs 5.24 [SD: 1.68], p = 0.026, respectively), and H&H scales (2.96 [SD: 2.60] vs 4.97 [SD: 1.87], p<0.001, respectively) showed a significant difference in the 90-day mean mRS scores. In multivariable models, with the same set of confounding variables, the modified WFNS grade of III to V (adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 9.090; 95% CI: 3.494-23.648; P<0.001) was more strongly associated with the increased risk of the 90-day poor outcome compared to the WFNS grade of IV to V (AOR: 6.383; 95% CI: 2.661-15.310; P<0.001) or the H&H grade of IV to V (AOR: 6.146; 95% CI: 2.584-14.620; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the modified WFNS, WFNS, and H&H scales all had good discriminatory abilities for the prognosis of patients with aSAH. Because of the better effect size in predicting poor outcomes, the modified WFNS scale seems preferable to the WFNS and H&H scales.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016528
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026105739.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0289267 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37607172
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Nguyen, Tuan Anh $u Center for Emergency Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
245    10
$a Validation of the accuracy of the modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale for predicting the outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage / $c TA. Nguyen, TD. Mai, LD. Vu, CX. Dao, HM. Ngo, HB. Hoang, TA. Tran, TQ. Pham, DT. Pham, MH. Nguyen, LQ. Nguyen, PV. Dao, DN. Nguyen, HTT. Vuong, HD. Vu, DD. Nguyen, TD. Vu, DT. Nguyen, ALN. Do, CD. Nguyen, SN. Do, HT. Nguyen, CV. Nguyen, AD. Nguyen, CQ. Luong
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Evaluating the prognosis of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who may be at risk of poor outcomes using grading systems is one way to make a better decision on treatment for these patients. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), WFNS, and Hunt and Hess (H&H) Grading Scales in predicting the outcomes of patients with aSAH. METHODS: From August 2019 to June 2021, we conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study on adult patients with aSAH in three central hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam. The primary outcome was the 90-day poor outcome, measured by a score of 4 (moderately severe disability) to 6 (death) on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). We calculated the areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROCs) to determine how well the grading scales could predict patient prognosis upon admission. We also used ROC curve analysis to find the best cut-off value for each scale. We compared AUROCs using Z-statistics and compared 90-day mean mRS scores among intergrades using the pairwise multiple-comparison test. Finally, we used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the 90-day poor outcome. RESULTS: Of 415 patients, 32% had a 90-day poor outcome. The modified WFNS (AUROC: 0.839 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.795-0.883]; cut-off value≥2.50; PAUROC<0.001), WFNS (AUROC: 0.837 [95% CI: 0.793-0.881]; cut-off value≥3.5; PAUROC<0.001), and H&H scales (AUROC: 0.836 [95% CI: 0.791-0.881]; cut-off value≥3.5; PAUROC<0.001) were all good at predicting patient prognosis on day 90th after ictus. However, there were no significant differences between the AUROCs of these scales. Only grades IV and V of the modified WFNS (3.75 [standard deviation, SD: 2.46] vs 5.24 [SD: 1.68], p = 0.026, respectively), WFNS (3.75 [SD: 2.46] vs 5.24 [SD: 1.68], p = 0.026, respectively), and H&H scales (2.96 [SD: 2.60] vs 4.97 [SD: 1.87], p<0.001, respectively) showed a significant difference in the 90-day mean mRS scores. In multivariable models, with the same set of confounding variables, the modified WFNS grade of III to V (adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 9.090; 95% CI: 3.494-23.648; P<0.001) was more strongly associated with the increased risk of the 90-day poor outcome compared to the WFNS grade of IV to V (AOR: 6.383; 95% CI: 2.661-15.310; P<0.001) or the H&H grade of IV to V (AOR: 6.146; 95% CI: 2.584-14.620; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the modified WFNS, WFNS, and H&H scales all had good discriminatory abilities for the prognosis of patients with aSAH. Because of the better effect size in predicting poor outcomes, the modified WFNS scale seems preferable to the WFNS and H&H scales.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a subarachnoidální krvácení $x diagnóza $7 D013345
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a hospitalizace $7 D006760
650    _2
$a nemocnice $7 D006761
650    _2
$a odds ratio $7 D016017
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mai, Ton Duy $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Stroke Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Vu, Luu Dang $u Radiology Centre, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Radiology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Dao, Co Xuan $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Center for Critical Care Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $1 https://orcid.org/0000000231822993
700    1_
$a Ngo, Hung Manh $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Neurosurgery II, Neurosurgery Center, Vietnam-Germany Friendship Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Surgery, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Hoang, Hai Bui $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Emergency and Critical Care Department, Hanoi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Tran, Tuan Anh $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Radiology Centre, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Radiology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Pham, Trang Quynh $u Department of Surgery, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Neurosurgery, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Pham, Dung Thi $u Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Nguyen, My Ha $u Department of Health Organization and Management, Faculty of Public Health, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Nguyen, Linh Quoc $u Center for Emergency Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Dao, Phuong Viet $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Stroke Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Nguyen, Duong Ngoc $u Center for Emergency Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Vuong, Hien Thi Thu $u Emergency Department, Vietnam-Czechoslovakia Friendship Hospital, Hai Phong, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Vu, Hung Dinh $u Emergency and Critical Care Department, Hanoi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Nguyen, Dong Duc $u Department of Neurosurgery II, Neurosurgery Center, Vietnam-Germany Friendship Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Vu, Thanh Dang $u Emergency Department, Agriculture General Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Nguyen, Dung Tien $u Stroke Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Do, Anh Le Ngoc $u Center for Emergency Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Nguyen, Cuong Duy $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Do, Son Ngoc $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Center for Critical Care Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Nguyen, Hao The $u Department of Surgery, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Neurosurgery, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Nguyen, Chi Van $u Center for Emergency Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Nguyen, Anh Dat $u Center for Emergency Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
700    1_
$a Luong, Chinh Quoc $u Center for Emergency Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam $1 https://orcid.org/000000026409577X
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 18, č. 8 (2023), s. e0289267
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37607172 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026105733 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000193 $s 1202890
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 18 $c 8 $d e0289267 $e 20230822 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options