-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
AMEERA-3: Randomized Phase II Study of Amcenestrant (Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Monotherapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer
SM. Tolaney, A. Chan, K. Petrakova, S. Delaloge, M. Campone, H. Iwata, PF. Peddi, PA. Kaufman, E. De Kermadec, Q. Liu, P. Cohen, G. Paux, L. Wang, N. Ternès, E. Boitier, SA. Im
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, klinické zkoušky, fáze II, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
PubMed
37348019
DOI
10.1200/jco.22.02746
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prsu * patologie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- receptor erbB-2 metabolismus MeSH
- receptory pro estrogeny metabolismus MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
PURPOSE: Amcenestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) demonstrated promising safety and efficacy in earlier clinical studies for endocrine-resistant, estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In AMEERA-3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04059484), an open-label, worldwide phase II trial, patients with ER+/HER2- aBC who progressed in the (neo)adjuvant or advanced settings after not more than two previous lines of endocrine therapy (ET) were randomly assigned 1:1 to amcenestrant or single-agent endocrine treatment of physician's choice (TPC), stratified by the presence/absence of visceral metastases, previous/no treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0/1). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent central review, compared using a stratified log-rank test (one-sided type I error rate of 2.5%). RESULTS: Between October 22, 2019, and February 15, 2021, 290 patients were randomly assigned to amcenestrant (n = 143) or TPC (n = 147). PFS was numerically similar between amcenestrant and TPC (median PFS [mPFS], 3.6 v 3.7 months; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.051 [95% CI, 0.789 to 1.4]; one-sided P = .643). Among patients with baseline mutated ESR1; (n = 120 of 280), amcenestrant numerically prolonged PFS versus TPC (mPFS, 3.7 v 2.0 months; stratified HR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.565 to 1.435]). Overall survival data were immature but numerically similar between groups (HR, 0.913; 95% CI, 0.595 to 1.403). In amcenestrant versus TPC groups, treatment-emergent adverse events (any grade) occurred in 82.5% versus 76.2% of patients and grade ≥3 events occurred in 21.7% versus 15.6%. CONCLUSION: AMEERA-3 did not meet its primary objective of improved PFS with amcenestrant versus TPC although a numerical improvement in PFS was observed in patients with baseline ESR1 mutation. Efficacy and safety with amcenestrant were consistent with the standard of care for second-/third-line ET for ER+/HER2- aBC.
Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Nagoya Japan
Curtin University Perth Australia
Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau Saint Herblain France
Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif France
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic
Providence Saint John's Cancer Institute Santa Monica CA
University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine Burlington VT
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23016537
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231026105737.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231013s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1200/JCO.22.02746 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37348019
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Tolaney, Sara M $u Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000259408671
- 245 10
- $a AMEERA-3: Randomized Phase II Study of Amcenestrant (Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Monotherapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer / $c SM. Tolaney, A. Chan, K. Petrakova, S. Delaloge, M. Campone, H. Iwata, PF. Peddi, PA. Kaufman, E. De Kermadec, Q. Liu, P. Cohen, G. Paux, L. Wang, N. Ternès, E. Boitier, SA. Im
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Amcenestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) demonstrated promising safety and efficacy in earlier clinical studies for endocrine-resistant, estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In AMEERA-3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04059484), an open-label, worldwide phase II trial, patients with ER+/HER2- aBC who progressed in the (neo)adjuvant or advanced settings after not more than two previous lines of endocrine therapy (ET) were randomly assigned 1:1 to amcenestrant or single-agent endocrine treatment of physician's choice (TPC), stratified by the presence/absence of visceral metastases, previous/no treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0/1). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent central review, compared using a stratified log-rank test (one-sided type I error rate of 2.5%). RESULTS: Between October 22, 2019, and February 15, 2021, 290 patients were randomly assigned to amcenestrant (n = 143) or TPC (n = 147). PFS was numerically similar between amcenestrant and TPC (median PFS [mPFS], 3.6 v 3.7 months; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.051 [95% CI, 0.789 to 1.4]; one-sided P = .643). Among patients with baseline mutated ESR1; (n = 120 of 280), amcenestrant numerically prolonged PFS versus TPC (mPFS, 3.7 v 2.0 months; stratified HR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.565 to 1.435]). Overall survival data were immature but numerically similar between groups (HR, 0.913; 95% CI, 0.595 to 1.403). In amcenestrant versus TPC groups, treatment-emergent adverse events (any grade) occurred in 82.5% versus 76.2% of patients and grade ≥3 events occurred in 21.7% versus 15.6%. CONCLUSION: AMEERA-3 did not meet its primary objective of improved PFS with amcenestrant versus TPC although a numerical improvement in PFS was observed in patients with baseline ESR1 mutation. Efficacy and safety with amcenestrant were consistent with the standard of care for second-/third-line ET for ER+/HER2- aBC.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a nádory prsu $x patologie $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a receptory pro estrogeny $x metabolismus $7 D011960
- 650 _2
- $a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000971
- 650 _2
- $a receptor erbB-2 $x metabolismus $7 D018719
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze II $7 D017427
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Chan, Arlene $u Curtin University, Perth, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000321352286
- 700 1_
- $a Petrakova, Katarina $u Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Delaloge, Suzette $u Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France $1 https://orcid.org/0000000321069165
- 700 1_
- $a Campone, Mario $u Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
- 700 1_
- $a Iwata, Hiroji $u Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan $1 https://orcid.org/0000000202424718
- 700 1_
- $a Peddi, Parvin F $u Providence Saint John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000284599828
- 700 1_
- $a Kaufman, Peter A $u University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT $1 https://orcid.org/0000000336776807
- 700 1_
- $a De Kermadec, Elisabeth $u Sanofi, Cambridge, MA
- 700 1_
- $a Liu, Qianying $u Sanofi, Cambridge, MA $u Moderna, Inc, Cambridge, MA
- 700 1_
- $a Cohen, Patrick $u Sanofi, Vitry-sur-Seine, France $1 https://orcid.org/0009000811871123
- 700 1_
- $a Paux, Gautier $u Sanofi, Cambridge, MA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000330026351
- 700 1_
- $a Wang, Lei $u Sanofi, Cambridge, MA
- 700 1_
- $a Ternès, Nils $u Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France
- 700 1_
- $a Boitier, Eric $u Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France
- 700 1_
- $a Im, Seock-Ah $u Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea $1 https://orcid.org/0000000253966533
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002596 $t Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology $x 1527-7755 $g Roč. 41, č. 24 (2023), s. 4014-4024
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37348019 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231026105731 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2000196 $s 1202899
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 41 $c 24 $d 4014-4024 $e 20230622 $i 1527-7755 $m Journal of clinical oncology $n J. clin. Oncol. $x MED00002596
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231013