• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

M1/M2 macrophages and their overlaps - myth or reality

Z. Strizova, I. Benesova, R. Bartolini, R. Novysedlak, E. Cecrdlova, LK. Foley, I. Striz

. 2023 ; 137 (15) : 1067-1093. [pub] 2023Aug14

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23016570

Macrophages represent heterogeneous cell population with important roles in defence mechanisms and in homoeostasis. Tissue macrophages from diverse anatomical locations adopt distinct activation states. M1 and M2 macrophages are two polarized forms of mononuclear phagocyte in vitro differentiation with distinct phenotypic patterns and functional properties, but in vivo, there is a wide range of different macrophage phenotypes in between depending on the microenvironment and natural signals they receive. In human infections, pathogens use different strategies to combat macrophages and these strategies include shaping the macrophage polarization towards one or another phenotype. Macrophages infiltrating the tumours can affect the patient's prognosis. M2 macrophages have been shown to promote tumour growth, while M1 macrophages provide both tumour-promoting and anti-tumour properties. In autoimmune diseases, both prolonged M1 activation, as well as altered M2 function can contribute to their onset and activity. In human atherosclerotic lesions, macrophages expressing both M1 and M2 profiles have been detected as one of the potential factors affecting occurrence of cardiovascular diseases. In allergic inflammation, T2 cytokines drive macrophage polarization towards M2 profiles, which promote airway inflammation and remodelling. M1 macrophages in transplantations seem to contribute to acute rejection, while M2 macrophages promote the fibrosis of the graft. The view of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and M2 macrophages suppressing inflammation seems to be an oversimplification because these cells exploit very high level of plasticity and represent a large scale of different immunophenotypes with overlapping properties. In this respect, it would be more precise to describe macrophages as M1-like and M2-like.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016570
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026105720.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1042/CS20220531 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37530555
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Strizova, Zuzana $u Department of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Uvalu 84, 15006, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a M1/M2 macrophages and their overlaps - myth or reality / $c Z. Strizova, I. Benesova, R. Bartolini, R. Novysedlak, E. Cecrdlova, LK. Foley, I. Striz
520    9_
$a Macrophages represent heterogeneous cell population with important roles in defence mechanisms and in homoeostasis. Tissue macrophages from diverse anatomical locations adopt distinct activation states. M1 and M2 macrophages are two polarized forms of mononuclear phagocyte in vitro differentiation with distinct phenotypic patterns and functional properties, but in vivo, there is a wide range of different macrophage phenotypes in between depending on the microenvironment and natural signals they receive. In human infections, pathogens use different strategies to combat macrophages and these strategies include shaping the macrophage polarization towards one or another phenotype. Macrophages infiltrating the tumours can affect the patient's prognosis. M2 macrophages have been shown to promote tumour growth, while M1 macrophages provide both tumour-promoting and anti-tumour properties. In autoimmune diseases, both prolonged M1 activation, as well as altered M2 function can contribute to their onset and activity. In human atherosclerotic lesions, macrophages expressing both M1 and M2 profiles have been detected as one of the potential factors affecting occurrence of cardiovascular diseases. In allergic inflammation, T2 cytokines drive macrophage polarization towards M2 profiles, which promote airway inflammation and remodelling. M1 macrophages in transplantations seem to contribute to acute rejection, while M2 macrophages promote the fibrosis of the graft. The view of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and M2 macrophages suppressing inflammation seems to be an oversimplification because these cells exploit very high level of plasticity and represent a large scale of different immunophenotypes with overlapping properties. In this respect, it would be more precise to describe macrophages as M1-like and M2-like.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a makrofágy $7 D008264
650    12
$a cytokiny $7 D016207
650    _2
$a fenotyp $7 D010641
650    _2
$a zánět $7 D007249
650    _2
$a buněčná diferenciace $7 D002454
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Benesova, Iva $u Department of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Uvalu 84, 15006, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bartolini, Robin $u Chemokine Research Group, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TT, U.K
700    1_
$a Novysedlak, Rene $u Third Department of Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, V Uvalu 84, 15006, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000226606815
700    1_
$a Cecrdlova, Eva $u Department of Clinical and Transplant Immunology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Foley, Lily Koumbas $u Chemokine Research Group, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TT, U.K
700    1_
$a Striz, Ilja $u Department of Clinical and Transplant Immunology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000192695652 $7 jn20000402309
773    0_
$w MED00009494 $t Clinical science (London, England : 1979) $x 1470-8736 $g Roč. 137, č. 15 (2023), s. 1067-1093
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37530555 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026105715 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000219 $s 1202932
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 137 $c 15 $d 1067-1093 $e 2023Aug14 $i 1470-8736 $m Clinical science (1979) $n Clin Sci (Lond) $x MED00009494
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...