• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Assessment of the thermal tissue models for the head and neck hyperthermia treatment planning

T. Drizdal, GC. van Rhoon, O. Fiser, D. Vrba, N. van Holthe, J. Vrba, MM. Paulides

. 2023 ; 115 (-) : 103625. [pub] 20230704

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23016945

PURPOSE: To compare different thermal tissue models for head and neck hyperthermia treatment planning, and to assess the results using predicted and measured applied power data from clinical treatments. METHODS: Three commonly used temperature models from literature were analysed: "constant baseline", "constant thermal stress" and "temperature dependent". Power and phase data of 93 treatments of 20 head and neck patients treated with the HYPERcollar3D applicator were used. The impact on predicted median temperature T50 inside the target region was analysed with maximum allowed temperature of 44 °C in healthy tissue. The robustness of predicted T50 for the three models against the influence of blood perfusion, thermal conductivity and the assumed hotspot temperature level was analysed. RESULTS: We found an average predicted T50 of 41.0 ± 1.3 °C (constant baseline model), 39.9 ± 1.1 °C (constant thermal stress model) and 41.7 ± 1.1 °C (temperature dependent model). The constant thermal stress model resulted in the best agreement between the predicted power (P = 132.7 ± 45.9 W) and the average power measured during the hyperthermia treatments (P = 129.1 ± 83.0 W). CONCLUSION: The temperature dependent model predicts an unrealistically high T50. The power values for the constant thermal stress model, after scaling simulated maximum temperatures to 44 °C, matched best to the average measured powers. We consider this model to be the most appropriate for temperature predictions using the HYPERcollar3D applicator, however further studies are necessary for developing of robust temperature model for tissues during heat stress.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23016945
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231026105441.0
007      
ta
008      
231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.103625 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37429086
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Drizdal, Tomas $u Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: t.drizdal@erasmusmc.nl
245    10
$a Assessment of the thermal tissue models for the head and neck hyperthermia treatment planning / $c T. Drizdal, GC. van Rhoon, O. Fiser, D. Vrba, N. van Holthe, J. Vrba, MM. Paulides
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To compare different thermal tissue models for head and neck hyperthermia treatment planning, and to assess the results using predicted and measured applied power data from clinical treatments. METHODS: Three commonly used temperature models from literature were analysed: "constant baseline", "constant thermal stress" and "temperature dependent". Power and phase data of 93 treatments of 20 head and neck patients treated with the HYPERcollar3D applicator were used. The impact on predicted median temperature T50 inside the target region was analysed with maximum allowed temperature of 44 °C in healthy tissue. The robustness of predicted T50 for the three models against the influence of blood perfusion, thermal conductivity and the assumed hotspot temperature level was analysed. RESULTS: We found an average predicted T50 of 41.0 ± 1.3 °C (constant baseline model), 39.9 ± 1.1 °C (constant thermal stress model) and 41.7 ± 1.1 °C (temperature dependent model). The constant thermal stress model resulted in the best agreement between the predicted power (P = 132.7 ± 45.9 W) and the average power measured during the hyperthermia treatments (P = 129.1 ± 83.0 W). CONCLUSION: The temperature dependent model predicts an unrealistically high T50. The power values for the constant thermal stress model, after scaling simulated maximum temperatures to 44 °C, matched best to the average measured powers. We consider this model to be the most appropriate for temperature predictions using the HYPERcollar3D applicator, however further studies are necessary for developing of robust temperature model for tissues during heat stress.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a indukovaná hypertermie $x metody $7 D006979
650    _2
$a teplota $7 D013696
650    _2
$a krk $7 D009333
650    _2
$a hypertermie $x etiologie $7 D000084462
650    _2
$a hlava $7 D006257
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a van Rhoon, Gerard C $u Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Fiser, Ondrej $u Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vrba, David $u Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a van Holthe, Netteke $u Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Vrba, Jan $u Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Paulides, Margarethus M $u Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
773    0_
$w MED00008633 $t Journal of thermal biology $x 0306-4565 $g Roč. 115, č. - (2023), s. 103625
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37429086 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231026105435 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2000459 $s 1203307
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 115 $c - $d 103625 $e 20230704 $i 0306-4565 $m Journal of thermal biology $n J Therm Biol $x MED00008633
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...