• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Biomechanical comparison of the roof step cut technique with the bulk bone graft technique during total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia: a finite element analysis [Biomechanické porovnání techniky plastiky acetabula pomocí schodovitě opracovaného štěpu s technikou masivního kostního štěpu u TP kyčle po dysplazii: analýza konečných prvků]

L. Zhang, R. Alkentar, S. Manó, J. Szabó, T. Mankovits, Z. Csernátony

. 2023 ; 90 (5) : 301-313. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23018190

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2006

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Different techniques have been reported to reconstruct the defi cient acetabulum during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical features of the bulk bone graft (BBG) technique (Harris acetabular plasty) and the Roof Step Cut (RSC) technique using fi nite element analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Based on a female patient's dysplastic hip CT scan, 3D models were assembled according to the two techniques. For the Harris technique, an irregular BBG was sculpted from a solid sphere, while for the RSC technique, the graft was sculpted into a step-cut shape with a similar size. Each graft was fi xed with two compression screws at two different angles (0° and 45°). Four fi nite element models were used to compare the von Mises stress distribution and total deformation of the grafts and the screws. The pressure and sliding distances of the contacts between the bone graft, metal cup and acetabular host bone were also analyzed. RESULTS For both of the bone grafts and the screws, compared to the Harris models, the maximum stress of the RSC models was signifi cantly lower (16.56 MPa, 25.50 MPa vs 97.13 MPa, 112.72 MPa) and the total deformation was signifi cantly smaller (0.0096 mm, 0.0089 mm vs 0.022 mm, 0.018 mm). 45° inserted screws generated higher stress at the end of the screws and on the outside of the bone graft. In case of 0° inserted screws, the maximum value was mainly located in the middle of the screws, inside the screw channel as well as at the contact area between the graft and the host bone. At all analyzed contacts, the RSC technique shows signifi cantly lower pressure and sliding distances, irrelevant to the screw's insertion angle. In comparison, the model of BBG with 45° screws showed a signifi cant sliding effect and higher contact pressure. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the BBG technique, the step-shaped graft of the RSC technique could signifi cantly reduce the maximum stress and deformation of the graft and the screws, and decrease the pressure and sliding distance between the bone graft, metal cup and the acetabular host bone. The angle of screw placement affects the location of stress and deformation. Key words: developmental dysplasia of the hip, total hip arthroplasty, acetabular reconstruction, bone graft, fi nite element analysis.

Biomechanické porovnání techniky plastiky acetabula pomocí schodovitě opracovaného štěpu s technikou masivního kostního štěpu u TP kyčle po dysplazii: analýza konečných prvků

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23018190
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231121092153.0
007      
ta
008      
231107s2023 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)37898493
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Zhang, Lei $u Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary
245    10
$a Biomechanical comparison of the roof step cut technique with the bulk bone graft technique during total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia: a finite element analysis / $c L. Zhang, R. Alkentar, S. Manó, J. Szabó, T. Mankovits, Z. Csernátony
246    31
$a Biomechanické porovnání techniky plastiky acetabula pomocí schodovitě opracovaného štěpu s technikou masivního kostního štěpu u TP kyčle po dysplazii: analýza konečných prvků
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Different techniques have been reported to reconstruct the defi cient acetabulum during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical features of the bulk bone graft (BBG) technique (Harris acetabular plasty) and the Roof Step Cut (RSC) technique using fi nite element analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Based on a female patient's dysplastic hip CT scan, 3D models were assembled according to the two techniques. For the Harris technique, an irregular BBG was sculpted from a solid sphere, while for the RSC technique, the graft was sculpted into a step-cut shape with a similar size. Each graft was fi xed with two compression screws at two different angles (0° and 45°). Four fi nite element models were used to compare the von Mises stress distribution and total deformation of the grafts and the screws. The pressure and sliding distances of the contacts between the bone graft, metal cup and acetabular host bone were also analyzed. RESULTS For both of the bone grafts and the screws, compared to the Harris models, the maximum stress of the RSC models was signifi cantly lower (16.56 MPa, 25.50 MPa vs 97.13 MPa, 112.72 MPa) and the total deformation was signifi cantly smaller (0.0096 mm, 0.0089 mm vs 0.022 mm, 0.018 mm). 45° inserted screws generated higher stress at the end of the screws and on the outside of the bone graft. In case of 0° inserted screws, the maximum value was mainly located in the middle of the screws, inside the screw channel as well as at the contact area between the graft and the host bone. At all analyzed contacts, the RSC technique shows signifi cantly lower pressure and sliding distances, irrelevant to the screw's insertion angle. In comparison, the model of BBG with 45° screws showed a signifi cant sliding effect and higher contact pressure. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the BBG technique, the step-shaped graft of the RSC technique could signifi cantly reduce the maximum stress and deformation of the graft and the screws, and decrease the pressure and sliding distance between the bone graft, metal cup and the acetabular host bone. The angle of screw placement affects the location of stress and deformation. Key words: developmental dysplasia of the hip, total hip arthroplasty, acetabular reconstruction, bone graft, fi nite element analysis.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x metody $7 D019644
650    12
$a luxace kyčle $x chirurgie $7 D006617
650    _2
$a analýza metodou konečných prvků $7 D020342
650    12
$a vývojová kyčelní dysplazie $x chirurgie $7 D006618
650    _2
$a acetabulum $x chirurgie $7 D000077
650    12
$a kyčelní protézy $7 D006622
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Alkentar, R. $u Doctoral School of Informatics, Faculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, Hungary
700    1_
$a Manó, S. $u Laboratory of Biomechanics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary
700    1_
$a Szabó, J. $u Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary
700    1_
$a Mankovits, T. $u Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Hungary
700    1_
$a Csernátony, Z. $u Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 90, č. 5 (2023), s. 301-313
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37898493 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20231107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231121092150 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2011492 $s 1204593
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 90 $c 5 $d 301-313 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20231107

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...