-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization versus Surgery in Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma-No More Fence Sitting
D. Sila, FL. Casnati, M. Vojtková, P. Kirsch, S. Rath, F. Charvát
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2009
Free Medical Journals
od 2009
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 2009
PubMed Central
od 2009
Europe PubMed Central
od 2009
ProQuest Central
od 2009-11-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-11-01
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-11-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2009
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of patients with chronic subdural hematoma using middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization could become an alternative to surgical hematoma evacuation. The aim of the study was to compare methods and identify parameters to help determine the correct treatment modality. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 142 cases conducted internally; 78 were treated surgically and 64 were treated using MMA embolization. We analyzed the treatment failure rate and complications, and using a binary logistic regression model, we identified treatment failure risk factors. RESULTS: We found a comparable treatment failure rate of 23.1% for the surgery group and 21.9% for the MMA embolization group. However, in the MMA embolization group, 11 cases showed treatment failure due to early neurological worsening with a need for concomitant surgery. We also found a recurrence of hematoma in 15.4% of cases in the surgery group and 6.3% of cases in the MMA embolization group. CONCLUSION: Both modalities have their advantages; however, correct identification is crucial for treatment success. According to our findings, hematomas with a maximal width of <18 mm, a midline shift of <5 mm, and no acute or subacute (hyperdense) hematoma could be treated with MMA embolization. Hematomas with a maximal width of >18 mm, a midline shift of >5 mm, and no membranous segmentation could have better outcomes after surgical treatment.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23022365
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240116163022.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240105s2023 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/neurolint15040096 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38132975
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Sila, Dalibor $u Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donau Isar Klinikum Deggendorf, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Military University Hospital, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 16902 Praha, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization versus Surgery in Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma-No More Fence Sitting / $c D. Sila, FL. Casnati, M. Vojtková, P. Kirsch, S. Rath, F. Charvát
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of patients with chronic subdural hematoma using middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization could become an alternative to surgical hematoma evacuation. The aim of the study was to compare methods and identify parameters to help determine the correct treatment modality. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 142 cases conducted internally; 78 were treated surgically and 64 were treated using MMA embolization. We analyzed the treatment failure rate and complications, and using a binary logistic regression model, we identified treatment failure risk factors. RESULTS: We found a comparable treatment failure rate of 23.1% for the surgery group and 21.9% for the MMA embolization group. However, in the MMA embolization group, 11 cases showed treatment failure due to early neurological worsening with a need for concomitant surgery. We also found a recurrence of hematoma in 15.4% of cases in the surgery group and 6.3% of cases in the MMA embolization group. CONCLUSION: Both modalities have their advantages; however, correct identification is crucial for treatment success. According to our findings, hematomas with a maximal width of <18 mm, a midline shift of <5 mm, and no acute or subacute (hyperdense) hematoma could be treated with MMA embolization. Hematomas with a maximal width of >18 mm, a midline shift of >5 mm, and no membranous segmentation could have better outcomes after surgical treatment.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Casnati, Francisco Luis $u Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donau Isar Klinikum Deggendorf, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Vojtková, Mária $u Department of Statistics, Faculty of Economic Informatics, University of Economics in Bratislava, Dolnozemská Cesta 1/b, Bratislava 85235, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/000000016257901X
- 700 1_
- $a Kirsch, Philipp $u Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Donau Isar Klinikum Deggendorf, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Rath, Stefan $u Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donau Isar Klinikum Deggendorf, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Charvát, František $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Military University Hospital, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 16902 Praha, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00207994 $t Neurology international $x 2035-8385 $g Roč. 15, č. 4 (2023), s. 1480-1488
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38132975 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240116163019 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2036258 $s 1208810
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 15 $c 4 $d 1480-1488 $e 20231206 $i 2035-8385 $m Neurology international $n Neurol Int $x MED00207994
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240105