-
Something wrong with this record ?
When and where did it happen? Systematic differences in recall of core and optional sentence information
J. Chromý, S. Vojvodić
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Reading MeSH
- Language * MeSH
- Memory, Short-Term physiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Comprehension physiology MeSH
- Mental Recall * physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
This article reports on four experiments aiming to examine immediate post-sentential recall of core sentence information (conveyed by direct objects), and optional/additional information (conveyed by temporal or locative adjuncts). Participants read simple and unambiguous Czech sentences such as Starší důchodce velmi pečlivě pročetl noviny v neděli v knihovně: "An older retiree read the newspaper very carefully on Sunday in the library." Sentences always appeared as a whole after pressing a space bar. Immediately after the sentence disappeared, an open-ended (free response) question was presented targeting either the direct object (e.g., newspaper), temporal adjunct (e.g., on Sunday), or locative adjunct (e.g., in the library). Altogether, it was found that the core information (conveyed by the direct object) was recalled almost perfectly, whereas additional information, conveyed by temporal and locative adjuncts, was recalled with significantly lower accuracy rates. Information structure also played a role: if the temporal or locative adjunct was focused, it was recalled better than if it was unfocused. The present article thus shows systematic differences in recall success for different pieces of information. These findings suggest the presence of selective attention mechanisms during early stages of sentence processing. Factors such as syntactic function or information structure influence the degree of attention to different pieces of information conveyed by a sentence. In turn, certain pieces of information may not be consciously accessible already after the sentence is processed.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000168
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093010.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/17470218231159190 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36786323
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Chromý, Jan $u Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000166468026
- 245 10
- $a When and where did it happen? Systematic differences in recall of core and optional sentence information / $c J. Chromý, S. Vojvodić
- 520 9_
- $a This article reports on four experiments aiming to examine immediate post-sentential recall of core sentence information (conveyed by direct objects), and optional/additional information (conveyed by temporal or locative adjuncts). Participants read simple and unambiguous Czech sentences such as Starší důchodce velmi pečlivě pročetl noviny v neděli v knihovně: "An older retiree read the newspaper very carefully on Sunday in the library." Sentences always appeared as a whole after pressing a space bar. Immediately after the sentence disappeared, an open-ended (free response) question was presented targeting either the direct object (e.g., newspaper), temporal adjunct (e.g., on Sunday), or locative adjunct (e.g., in the library). Altogether, it was found that the core information (conveyed by the direct object) was recalled almost perfectly, whereas additional information, conveyed by temporal and locative adjuncts, was recalled with significantly lower accuracy rates. Information structure also played a role: if the temporal or locative adjunct was focused, it was recalled better than if it was unfocused. The present article thus shows systematic differences in recall success for different pieces of information. These findings suggest the presence of selective attention mechanisms during early stages of sentence processing. Factors such as syntactic function or information structure influence the degree of attention to different pieces of information conveyed by a sentence. In turn, certain pieces of information may not be consciously accessible already after the sentence is processed.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a jazyk (prostředek komunikace) $7 D007802
- 650 12
- $a rozpomínání $x fyziologie $7 D011939
- 650 _2
- $a krátkodobá paměť $x fyziologie $7 D008570
- 650 _2
- $a čtení $7 D011932
- 650 _2
- $a pochopení $x fyziologie $7 D032882
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vojvodić, Sonja $u Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00184319 $t The quarterly journal of experimental psychology. 2006 $x 1747-0226 $g Roč. 77, č. 1 (2024), s. 111-132
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36786323 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093008 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049076 $s 1209862
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 77 $c 1 $d 111-132 $e 20230326 $i 1747-0226 $m The quarterly journal of experimental psychology. 2006 $n Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) $x MED00184319
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109