• Something wrong with this record ?

When and where did it happen? Systematic differences in recall of core and optional sentence information

J. Chromý, S. Vojvodić

. 2024 ; 77 (1) : 111-132. [pub] 20230326

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

This article reports on four experiments aiming to examine immediate post-sentential recall of core sentence information (conveyed by direct objects), and optional/additional information (conveyed by temporal or locative adjuncts). Participants read simple and unambiguous Czech sentences such as Starší důchodce velmi pečlivě pročetl noviny v neděli v knihovně: "An older retiree read the newspaper very carefully on Sunday in the library." Sentences always appeared as a whole after pressing a space bar. Immediately after the sentence disappeared, an open-ended (free response) question was presented targeting either the direct object (e.g., newspaper), temporal adjunct (e.g., on Sunday), or locative adjunct (e.g., in the library). Altogether, it was found that the core information (conveyed by the direct object) was recalled almost perfectly, whereas additional information, conveyed by temporal and locative adjuncts, was recalled with significantly lower accuracy rates. Information structure also played a role: if the temporal or locative adjunct was focused, it was recalled better than if it was unfocused. The present article thus shows systematic differences in recall success for different pieces of information. These findings suggest the presence of selective attention mechanisms during early stages of sentence processing. Factors such as syntactic function or information structure influence the degree of attention to different pieces of information conveyed by a sentence. In turn, certain pieces of information may not be consciously accessible already after the sentence is processed.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000168
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093010.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/17470218231159190 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36786323
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Chromý, Jan $u Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000166468026
245    10
$a When and where did it happen? Systematic differences in recall of core and optional sentence information / $c J. Chromý, S. Vojvodić
520    9_
$a This article reports on four experiments aiming to examine immediate post-sentential recall of core sentence information (conveyed by direct objects), and optional/additional information (conveyed by temporal or locative adjuncts). Participants read simple and unambiguous Czech sentences such as Starší důchodce velmi pečlivě pročetl noviny v neděli v knihovně: "An older retiree read the newspaper very carefully on Sunday in the library." Sentences always appeared as a whole after pressing a space bar. Immediately after the sentence disappeared, an open-ended (free response) question was presented targeting either the direct object (e.g., newspaper), temporal adjunct (e.g., on Sunday), or locative adjunct (e.g., in the library). Altogether, it was found that the core information (conveyed by the direct object) was recalled almost perfectly, whereas additional information, conveyed by temporal and locative adjuncts, was recalled with significantly lower accuracy rates. Information structure also played a role: if the temporal or locative adjunct was focused, it was recalled better than if it was unfocused. The present article thus shows systematic differences in recall success for different pieces of information. These findings suggest the presence of selective attention mechanisms during early stages of sentence processing. Factors such as syntactic function or information structure influence the degree of attention to different pieces of information conveyed by a sentence. In turn, certain pieces of information may not be consciously accessible already after the sentence is processed.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a jazyk (prostředek komunikace) $7 D007802
650    12
$a rozpomínání $x fyziologie $7 D011939
650    _2
$a krátkodobá paměť $x fyziologie $7 D008570
650    _2
$a čtení $7 D011932
650    _2
$a pochopení $x fyziologie $7 D032882
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vojvodić, Sonja $u Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00184319 $t The quarterly journal of experimental psychology. 2006 $x 1747-0226 $g Roč. 77, č. 1 (2024), s. 111-132
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36786323 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093008 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049076 $s 1209862
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 77 $c 1 $d 111-132 $e 20230326 $i 1747-0226 $m The quarterly journal of experimental psychology. 2006 $n Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) $x MED00184319
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...