• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Antenatal and intrapartum care for women with gestational diabetes: a best practice implementation project

D. Stan, DC. Mazilu, M. Zazu, V. Nedelcu, M. Teodor, E. Brătilă, T. Vrbová, M. Klugar, J. Klugarová

. 2023 ; 21 (S1) : S38-S46. [pub] 20231201

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24000328

OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to improve the quality of antenatal and intrapartum care for women with gestational diabetes (GD) by increasing nursing and midwifery care compliance with best practice recommendations. INTRODUCTION: GD is one of the most common diseases that can lead to several important maternal and fetal complications. METHODS: This project was based on JBI's evidence implementation approach and included a baseline audit, the implementation of strategies, and a follow-up audit. The project was conducted in an obstetrics-gynecology department of a hospital in Bucharest, and the sample included 30 pregnant women with GD from that ward. RESULTS: Regarding antenatal care, the baseline audit revealed low compliance (63%-87%) for criterion 2 (specific education), criterion 3 (multidisciplinary team), criterion 4 (individualized care plan), criterion 5 (training on self-monitoring), criterion 8 (dietician consultation), and criterion 10 (physical exercise program). Compliance with criterion 9 (physiotherapist consultation) was nil. Higher compliance (90%-100%) was reported for criterion 1 (screening for GD), criterion 6 (self-monitoring), and criterion 7 (maintenance of glycemic values). The intrapartum care audit criteria regarding maintaining blood glucose levels had compliance rates of 97% (criteria 13 and 14), 73% (criterion 11), and 67% (criterion 12). As a result of implementing the most appropriate strategies, maximum improvement was observed for all 12 audit criteria found to be deficient in the baseline audit. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies were identified and applied to successfully implement the best practices (educational programs and improved procedures). However, specific actions, such as regular targeted audits and continuous monitoring, are needed to maintain long-term results.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000328
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093118.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000392 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38037447
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Stan, Daniela $u The Order of Nurses, Midwives and Medical Assistants in Romania Bucharest Branch, Romanian Centre for Nursing Research: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Bucharest, Romania $u Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania $u Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology "Prof Dr Panait Sârbu," Bucharest, Romania
245    10
$a Antenatal and intrapartum care for women with gestational diabetes: a best practice implementation project / $c D. Stan, DC. Mazilu, M. Zazu, V. Nedelcu, M. Teodor, E. Brătilă, T. Vrbová, M. Klugar, J. Klugarová
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to improve the quality of antenatal and intrapartum care for women with gestational diabetes (GD) by increasing nursing and midwifery care compliance with best practice recommendations. INTRODUCTION: GD is one of the most common diseases that can lead to several important maternal and fetal complications. METHODS: This project was based on JBI's evidence implementation approach and included a baseline audit, the implementation of strategies, and a follow-up audit. The project was conducted in an obstetrics-gynecology department of a hospital in Bucharest, and the sample included 30 pregnant women with GD from that ward. RESULTS: Regarding antenatal care, the baseline audit revealed low compliance (63%-87%) for criterion 2 (specific education), criterion 3 (multidisciplinary team), criterion 4 (individualized care plan), criterion 5 (training on self-monitoring), criterion 8 (dietician consultation), and criterion 10 (physical exercise program). Compliance with criterion 9 (physiotherapist consultation) was nil. Higher compliance (90%-100%) was reported for criterion 1 (screening for GD), criterion 6 (self-monitoring), and criterion 7 (maintenance of glycemic values). The intrapartum care audit criteria regarding maintaining blood glucose levels had compliance rates of 97% (criteria 13 and 14), 73% (criterion 11), and 67% (criterion 12). As a result of implementing the most appropriate strategies, maximum improvement was observed for all 12 audit criteria found to be deficient in the baseline audit. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies were identified and applied to successfully implement the best practices (educational programs and improved procedures). However, specific actions, such as regular targeted audits and continuous monitoring, are needed to maintain long-term results.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    12
$a gestační diabetes $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D016640
650    _2
$a lékařská praxe založená na důkazech $7 D055317
650    _2
$a nemocnice $7 D006761
650    _2
$a prenatální péče $7 D011295
650    _2
$a konziliární vyšetření a konzultace $7 D012017
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mazilu, Doina C $u The Order of Nurses, Midwives and Medical Assistants in Romania Bucharest Branch, Romanian Centre for Nursing Research: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Bucharest, Romania $u Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
700    1_
$a Zazu, Mariana $u The Order of Nurses, Midwives and Medical Assistants in Romania Bucharest Branch, Romanian Centre for Nursing Research: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Bucharest, Romania
700    1_
$a Nedelcu, Viorica $u The Order of Nurses, Midwives and Medical Assistants in Romania Bucharest Branch, Romanian Centre for Nursing Research: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Bucharest, Romania
700    1_
$a Teodor, Monica $u Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology "Prof Dr Panait Sârbu," Bucharest, Romania
700    1_
$a Brătilă, Elvira $u Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania $u Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology "Prof Dr Panait Sârbu," Bucharest, Romania
700    1_
$a Vrbová, Tereza $u Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Klugar, Miloslav $u Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Klugarová, Jitka $u Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000172549586 $7 jo2016900027
773    0_
$w MED00210184 $t JBI evidence implementation $x 2691-3321 $g Roč. 21, Suppl. 1 (2023), s. S38-S46
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38037447 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093115 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049160 $s 1210022
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 21 $c S1 $d S38-S46 $e 20231201 $i 2691-3321 $m JBI evidence implementation $n JBI Evid Implement $x MED00210184
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...