• Something wrong with this record ?

Content and specificity of the Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in solutions for immunoglobulin replacement therapy

T. Milota, J. Smetanova, H. Zelena, M. Rataj, J. Lastovicka, J. Bartunkova

. 2023 ; 125 (Pt B) : 111159. [pub] 20231111

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Specific antibodies are important for post-vaccination and post-infection immune responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The role of antibodies in preventing and treating Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in high-risk populations has been highlighted through the use of virus-specific monoclonal antibodies, which has raised the question of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) used in immunocompromised patients. METHODS: Virus-specific anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid protein (NCAP) antibodies (assessed using a chemiluminescence assay and virus-neutralizing antibodies (virus neutralization test against Delta and Omicron variants)) were analyzed in 20 batches of 10 % (100 mg/mL) immunoglobulin solutions for intravenous IRT from two commercially available producers between January 2022 and March 2023 for clinical use. RESULTS: Anti-RBD and anti-NCAP antibodies were detected in all 20 batches of assessed IRT solutions (mean concentrations of 2817 IU/mL and 2380 IU/mL, respectively). Notably, the concentration of the virus-specific antibodies increased continuously during the follow-up period (from 822.5 IU/mL to 4066.4 IU/mL and 102 IU/mL to 3455.9 IU/mL). These antibodies demonstrated high virus-neutralizing activity against the Delta variant (mean titers of 436 and 325) but were limited to the Omicron variant (mean titers 78 and 70). The differences observed between the two brands were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: IRT solutions contain high concentrations of anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies, which may prevent COVID-19; however, the efficacy can be influenced by variable virus-neutralizing activities against different viral strains. Therefore, appropriate IRT should be combined with other approaches, such as vaccination or pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis. Passively transmitted specific antibodies may also lead to false-positive serological test results.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000365
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093130.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2023 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111159 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37956487
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Milota, Tomas $u Department of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Czech Republic. Electronic address: tomas.milota@fnmotol.cz
245    10
$a Content and specificity of the Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in solutions for immunoglobulin replacement therapy / $c T. Milota, J. Smetanova, H. Zelena, M. Rataj, J. Lastovicka, J. Bartunkova
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Specific antibodies are important for post-vaccination and post-infection immune responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The role of antibodies in preventing and treating Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in high-risk populations has been highlighted through the use of virus-specific monoclonal antibodies, which has raised the question of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) used in immunocompromised patients. METHODS: Virus-specific anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid protein (NCAP) antibodies (assessed using a chemiluminescence assay and virus-neutralizing antibodies (virus neutralization test against Delta and Omicron variants)) were analyzed in 20 batches of 10 % (100 mg/mL) immunoglobulin solutions for intravenous IRT from two commercially available producers between January 2022 and March 2023 for clinical use. RESULTS: Anti-RBD and anti-NCAP antibodies were detected in all 20 batches of assessed IRT solutions (mean concentrations of 2817 IU/mL and 2380 IU/mL, respectively). Notably, the concentration of the virus-specific antibodies increased continuously during the follow-up period (from 822.5 IU/mL to 4066.4 IU/mL and 102 IU/mL to 3455.9 IU/mL). These antibodies demonstrated high virus-neutralizing activity against the Delta variant (mean titers of 436 and 325) but were limited to the Omicron variant (mean titers 78 and 70). The differences observed between the two brands were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: IRT solutions contain high concentrations of anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies, which may prevent COVID-19; however, the efficacy can be influenced by variable virus-neutralizing activities against different viral strains. Therefore, appropriate IRT should be combined with other approaches, such as vaccination or pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis. Passively transmitted specific antibodies may also lead to false-positive serological test results.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a COVID-19 $x terapie $7 D000086382
650    _2
$a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
650    _2
$a pasivní imunizace $7 D007116
650    _2
$a protilátky virové $x terapeutické užití $7 D000914
650    _2
$a nukleokapsida - proteiny $7 D019590
650    _2
$a virové receptory $7 D011991
650    _2
$a neutralizující protilátky $x terapeutické užití $7 D057134
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Smetanova, Jitka $u Department of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zelena, Hana $u Department of Virology, Public Health Institute, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rataj, Michal $u Department of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lastovicka, Jan $u Department of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bartunkova, Jirina $u Department of Immunology, Second Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00006034 $t International immunopharmacology $x 1878-1705 $g Roč. 125, č. Pt B (2023), s. 111159
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37956487 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093127 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049182 $s 1210059
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 125 $c Pt B $d 111159 $e 20231111 $i 1878-1705 $m International immunopharmacology $n Int Immunopharmacol $x MED00006034
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...