Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Transseptal puncture in left atrial appendage closure guided by 3D printing and multiplanar CT reconstruction

M. Hozman, D. Herman, D. Zemanek, O. Fiser, D. Vrba, M. Poloczek, I. Varvarovsky, P. Obona, T. Pokorny, P. Osmancik

. 2023 ; 102 (7) : 1331-1340. [pub] 20231019

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
ID Project No. LX22NPO5104 National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases
European Union-Next Generation EU
Charles University Research Program "Cooperatio Cardiovascular Sciences"

BACKGROUND: The presented study investigates the application of bi-arterial 3D printed models to guide transseptal puncture (TSP) in left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). AIMS: The objectives are to (1) test the feasibility of 3D printing (3DP) for TSP guidance, (2) analyse the distribution of the optimal TSP locations, and (3) define a CT-derived 2D parameter suitable for predicting the optimal TSP locations. METHODS: Preprocedural planning included multiplanar CT reconstruction, 3D segmentation, and 3DP. TSP was preprocedurally simulated in vitro at six defined sites. Based on the position of the sheath, TSP sites were classified as optimal, suboptimal, or nonoptimal. The aim was to target the TSP in the recommended position during the procedure. Procedure progress was assessed post hoc by the operator. RESULTS: Of 68 screened patients, 60 patients in five centers (mean age of 74.68 ± 7.64 years, 71.66% males) were prospectively analyzed (3DP failed in one case, and seven patients did not finally undergo the procedure). In 55 patients (91.66%), TSP was performed in the optimal location as recommended by the 3DP. The optimal locations for TSP were postero-inferior in 45.3%, mid-inferior in 45.3%, and antero-inferior in 37.7%, with a mean number of optimal segments of 1.34 ± 0.51 per patient. When the optimal TSP location was achieved, the procedure was considered difficult in only two (3.6%) patients (but in both due to complicated LAA anatomy). Comparing anterior versus posterior TSP in 2D CCT, two parameters differed significantly: (1) the angle supplementary to the LAA ostium and the interatrial septum angle (160.83° ± 9.42° vs. 146.49° ± 8.67°; p = 0.001), and (2) the angle between the LAA ostium and the mitral annulus (95.02° ± 3.73° vs. 107.38° ± 6.76°; p < 0.001), both in the sagittal plane. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro TSP simulation accurately determined the optimal TSP locations for LAAC and facilitated the procedure. More than one-third of the optimal TSP sites were anterior.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000408
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093149.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/ccd.30867 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37855202
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hozman, Marek $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000341114218
245    10
$a Transseptal puncture in left atrial appendage closure guided by 3D printing and multiplanar CT reconstruction / $c M. Hozman, D. Herman, D. Zemanek, O. Fiser, D. Vrba, M. Poloczek, I. Varvarovsky, P. Obona, T. Pokorny, P. Osmancik
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The presented study investigates the application of bi-arterial 3D printed models to guide transseptal puncture (TSP) in left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). AIMS: The objectives are to (1) test the feasibility of 3D printing (3DP) for TSP guidance, (2) analyse the distribution of the optimal TSP locations, and (3) define a CT-derived 2D parameter suitable for predicting the optimal TSP locations. METHODS: Preprocedural planning included multiplanar CT reconstruction, 3D segmentation, and 3DP. TSP was preprocedurally simulated in vitro at six defined sites. Based on the position of the sheath, TSP sites were classified as optimal, suboptimal, or nonoptimal. The aim was to target the TSP in the recommended position during the procedure. Procedure progress was assessed post hoc by the operator. RESULTS: Of 68 screened patients, 60 patients in five centers (mean age of 74.68 ± 7.64 years, 71.66% males) were prospectively analyzed (3DP failed in one case, and seven patients did not finally undergo the procedure). In 55 patients (91.66%), TSP was performed in the optimal location as recommended by the 3DP. The optimal locations for TSP were postero-inferior in 45.3%, mid-inferior in 45.3%, and antero-inferior in 37.7%, with a mean number of optimal segments of 1.34 ± 0.51 per patient. When the optimal TSP location was achieved, the procedure was considered difficult in only two (3.6%) patients (but in both due to complicated LAA anatomy). Comparing anterior versus posterior TSP in 2D CCT, two parameters differed significantly: (1) the angle supplementary to the LAA ostium and the interatrial septum angle (160.83° ± 9.42° vs. 146.49° ± 8.67°; p = 0.001), and (2) the angle between the LAA ostium and the mitral annulus (95.02° ± 3.73° vs. 107.38° ± 6.76°; p < 0.001), both in the sagittal plane. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro TSP simulation accurately determined the optimal TSP locations for LAAC and facilitated the procedure. More than one-third of the optimal TSP sites were anterior.
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a síňové ouško $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D020517
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x terapie $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    _2
$a 3D tisk $7 D066330
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
650    _2
$a punkce $x metody $7 D011677
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Herman, Dalibor $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zemanek, David $u Second Department of Internal Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Fiser, Ondrej $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, CTU in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vrba, David $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, CTU in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Poloczek, Martin $u Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Varvarovsky, Ivo $u Cardiology Center AGEL, Pardubice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Obona, Peter $u Cardiocenter, University Hospital Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Pokorny, Tomas $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, CTU in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000304824448 $7 xx0104796
773    0_
$w MED00005333 $t Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions $x 1522-726X $g Roč. 102, č. 7 (2023), s. 1331-1340
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37855202 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093146 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049209 $s 1210102
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 102 $c 7 $d 1331-1340 $e 20231019 $i 1522-726X $m Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions $n Catheter Cardiovasc Interv $x MED00005333
GRA    __
$a ID Project No. LX22NPO5104 $p National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases
GRA    __
$p European Union-Next Generation EU
GRA    __
$p Charles University Research Program "Cooperatio Cardiovascular Sciences"
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...